언론의 특권에 대한 현대적 고찰-미국에서의 논의를 중심으로-
A modernistic Study of Journalist’s Privilege -Revolving around discussion of U.S.-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Journalist's privilege was argued in The United States based on 'the fourth estate' model. The first Case was Branzburg v. Hayes and Federal Courts received this theory in many cases. According to 'the fourth estate' model, press becomes the watchdog of government and for this role press has special rights by press clause that general citizens do not enjoy by speech clause. So the press based on 'the fourth estate' model must be professional media. But today, the view seeing the value of press clause as the watchdog of government is not right. Rather, We see the press as the forum of communications. Since 1990s new media has been appeared. The professional media will play an active role and the audience a passive one. This model of 'an informing press' and 'an informed public' has been upended. The public now not only consumes news, but reports it, disseinanates it, critiques it and talks back to itSo press of today should include the new media and this means that the 'the fourth estate' model and Journalist's privilege sould be changed. In U.S. federal courts, it has been determined which Media actions were included in action of press that was protected by press clause by using a functional test established in von Bulow v. von Bulow. And which media men(journalists) get the testimonial privilege is determined through four-factor test established in Jaffee v. Redmond.
Abstract
Journalist's privilege was argued in The United States based on 'the fourth estate' model. The first Case was Branzburg v. Hayes and Federal Courts received this theory in many cases. According to 'the fourth estate' model, press becomes the watchdog of government and for this role press has special rights by press clause that general citizens do not enjoy by speech clause. So the press based on 'the fourth estate' model must be professional media. But today, the view seeing the value of press clause as the watchdog of government is not right. Rather, We see the press as the forum of communications. Since 1990s new media has been appeared. The professional media will play an active role and the audience a passive one. This model of 'an informing press' and 'an informed public' has been upended. The public now not only consumes news, but reports it, disseinanates it, critiques it and talks back to itSo press of today should include the new media and this means that the 'the fourth estate' model and Journalist's privilege sould be changed. In U.S. federal courts, it has been determined which Media actions were included in action of press that was protected by press clause by using a functional test established in von Bulow v. von Bulow. And which media men(journalists) get the testimonial privilege is determined through four-factor test established in Jaffee v. Redmond.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김옥조, "미디어법" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김철수, "헌법학원론" (2004), 박영사
- 박진우, "취재의 자유와 취재원 비닉권", 경원법학, 3(3) (2010)
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2013), 법문사
- 林 鍾 煇, "미국헌법상의 취재원묵비권", 미국헌법연구, 17(2), pp.135~164 (2006), 미국헌법학회
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2009), 박영사
- 조재현, "헌법상의 취재원보호에 관한 미국, 독일과 우리나라의 이론과 판례", 법학연구, 11(3) (2001), 연세대학교 법학연구소
- 최희경, "미국헌법상 취재원보호에 관한 고찰", 헌법학연구, 14(3), pp.359~387 (2008), 한국헌법학회
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2013), 박영사
- Adam Cohen, "The Media That Need Citizens: The First Amendment And The Fifth Estate", Southern California Law Review, 85 (2011)
- Benno C. Schmidt, Jr., "Freedom of Press vs. Public Access" (1976), Michigan University
- CRS Reporrt for Congress - Journalists' Privilege to Withhold Information in Judicial and Proceedings: State Shield Statues, , ~ (2007)
- Vincent Blasi, "The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory", American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 2(3) (1977)
- Patric M. Garry, "Anonymous Sources, Libel Law and The First Amendment", Temp. L. Rev, 78 (2005)
- Potter Stewart, "Or Of the Press", Hastings Law Journal, 26 (1975)
- Isaiah Berlin, "Two Concepts of Liberty" (1969), Four Essays on Liberty
- Jeffrey B. Abramson, "The Electronic Commonwealth: The Impact of New Media Technologies on Democratic Politics" (1988), Basic books
- Joseph S. Alonzo, "Restoring The Ideal Marketplace: How Recognizing Blogers as Journalists can Save The Press", NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 9 (2006)
- Patrick Garry, "The First Amendment and Freedom of the Press: A Revised Approach to the Marketplace of Ideas Concept", Marq. L. Rev, 72 (1989)
- Patric M. Garry, "Scrambling for Protection: The New Media and the First Amendment" (1994), The University of Pittsburgh Press
- Yochai Benkler, "A Free Irresponsible Press: Wikileaks And The Battle Over The Soul Of The Networked Fourth Estate", Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 36 (2011)
