본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

리스본조약 발효 이후 EU의 국제투자관련 권한의 변경

Change of EU's Competence on International Investment After the Treaty of Lisbon

서철원
법학연구원 (Legal Research Institute of Korea University)|2015.01|법학논총 (The Legal Studies Institute of Chosun University)|제33권 |pp. 185-213|DOI 10.35867/ssulri.2015.33..009

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

FDIforeign direct investmentTreaty of Lisbon리스본조약투자보장협정직접투자ISDS투자자-국가 중재포트폴리오 투자portfolio investment유럽연합의 투자에 대한 권한EU's competence on foreign investment
주제분류사회과학법학

초록

이 논문은 FDI가 EU 공동통상정책의 일부가 된 후 발생할 수 있는 법적인 문제를 분석한다. FDI가 EU의 권한이 된 후 발생할 수 있는 법적인 문제로는, EU가 체결하는 BIT가 어떠한 내용이 될 것인가의 문제도 있다. 본고에서는 이 문제는 다루지 않고, EU의 FDI 권한과 관련된 형식적인 문제만을 분석하였다. 구체적으로는 다음과 같은 문제를 다룬다. 1) 리스본조약의 발효로 인해 EU의 권한이 FDI에는 포트폴리오 투자도 포함되는가 하는 문제2) EU의 권한은 FDI의 자유화와 관련된 문제만을 포함하는가 아니면 투자보호에 관한 내용도 포함하는가 하는 문제3) EU 회원국이 제3국과 체결한 투자보장협정이 리스본조약과 양립할 수 있는가의 문제4) EU 회원국간에 체결된 BIT가 리스본조약과 양립할 수 있는가의 문제5) EU가 체결하는 투자보장협정에서 규정하는 투자자-국가간 중재에서 발행하는 중재당사자의 문제, 중재판정 이행을 누가 책임지는가의 문제, EU가 ICSID 중재를 이용할 수 있는가의 문제이러한 문제들을 리스본조약 채택 후 EU에서의 논의, EU와 캐나다 간에 체결된 포괄적경제무역협정 등을 분석하는 내용을 이 논문은 담고 있다.

Abstract

This paper discusses legal issues arising from the transfer of the competence on FDI from its member states to the EU. The issues analysed in this paper are as follows:1) Whether the competence of the EU on "foreign direct investment" (FDI) as provided in the Treaty of Lisbon may be expanded to include portfolio investment?2) Whether the EU's competence on FDI may be applied to the taking of measures on the protection of foreign investment?3) Whether the extra-EU BITs are automatically terminated by the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty?4) Whether the intra-EU BITs are incompatible with the EU's competence on the FDI?5) Some legal issues arising from the ISDS provided in the BITs to which the EU is a contracting party. The answers conclusions to these issues provided in this paper are as follows1) It is difficult to accept the contention that EU competence on the includes portfolio investment. 2) As the measures on the protection of the FDI are relevant to the decision of investment, EU's competence on FDI should be interpreted to expand to taking measures on the treatment of the FDI. 3) EU enacted the 2012 Regulation, to deal with the validity of the extra-EU BITs in practical and progressive manner. 4) Even if no official document is adopted, the EU will find practical solution on the validity of the intra-EU BITs. The existing intra-EU BIT will remain effective. 5) The 2014 Regulation provides the guideline on the two issues: who is financially responsible for the arbitral award and who become the respondent in the ISDS provided in the BITs to which the EU is a contracting party. But the problem of how the EU is accessible to the ICSID is still not resolved.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 박덕영, "EU 법강의" (2010), 박영사
  2. Alvarez, José Enrique, "The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment", Hague Academy of International Law (2011)
  3. Burgenberg, Marc, "European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2010" (2010)
  4. Ceyssens, Jan, "Towards a Common Foreign Investment Policy?: Foreign Investment In the European Commission", Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 32, pp.259~ (2005)
  5. Dimopoulos, Angelos, "The Common Commercial Policy After the Lisbon Treaty: Establishing Parallelism Between Internal and External Economic Relations?", Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 4, pp.110~ (2008)
  6. Fontanell, Filippo, "Converging Towards NAFTA: An Analysis of FTA Investment in the European Union and the United States", Stan J. Int'l L, 50, pp.211~
  7. Krajewiki, Markus, "Externatl Trade Law and the Constitution Treaty:Towards a Federal and More Democratic Common Commercial Policy?", CML Rev, 32, pp.91~ (2005)
  8. Leczykiewicwicz, Dorota, "Common Commercial Policy: The Expanding Competence of the European Union in the Area of International Trade", German LJ, 6, pp.1673~ (2005)
  9. Muchlinski, Peter, "Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2009-2010" (2009), Oxford University Press
  10. Reinisch, Angust, "The EU on the Investment Path - Quo Vadis Europe? The Future of EU BITs and Other Investment Agreements", Santa Clara Int'l L, 12, pp.111~ (2013)
  11. Shan, Wenhua, "The Treaty of Lison: Half Way Toward a Common Investment Policy", EJIL, 21, pp.1051~ (2010)
  12. "ERTA사건, Case 22", 70 Commission v. Council 〔1970〕ECR 263, 1970
  13. "Kramer 사건, Opinion 1", 76 〔1977〕ECR 741, 1977
  14. "WTO 협정에 대한 EU의 권한 사건, Opinion 1", 94, 〔1994〕ECR I-5267, 1994
  15. "OECD-National Treatment in Investment 사건, Opinion 2", 92 1995〔1995〕 ECR-521, 1995
  16. "Case C-249/06, EC Commission v. Sweden" (2009)[URL]
  17. "Case C-205/06, EC Commission v. Austria" (2009)[URL]
  18. "Case C-118/07" (2009)[URL]
  19. "Opinion 1/94, Opinion pursuant to Article 228(6) of the EC Treaty (Competence of the Community to conclude international agreements concerning services and the protection of intellectual property - Article 228(6) of the E C Treaty)" (1994)[URL]
  20. "R. J Binder v. The Czech Republic, Award on Jurisdiction", ~ (2007)
  21. "Saluka Investment BV v. The Czech Republic, Partial Award" (2006)[URL]
  22. "Ioam Mi Voirel Micula and Others v. Romania(ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility" (2008)[URL]
  23. "Eastern Sugar v. Czech Republic, SCC Case No. 088/2004, Partial Award (Arbitration Institution of Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Mar. 27, 2009)" (2009)[URL]
  24. "Eureko BV v. The Slovak Republic, PCA Case No. 2008-12 Award on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Suspension (Oct. 26, 2010) paras" (2010)[URL]
  25. "Lisbon Treaty Judgement, German Constitutional Judgement 2 BvE 2/08" (2009)[URL]
  26. "Council Directive 88", 361 EEC of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty, O.J. EEC No L (Legislation), Edition 178, 1988
  27. "Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee on the Regions Towards a comprehensive European International Investment Policy (7 July 2010, COM(2010) 343)"[URL]
  28. "The 2011 EU Negotiating Mandate on Investment (2011, EU - Canada, India, Singapore)" (2011)[URL]
  29. "Regulation No. 1219/2012 on Establishing Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Investment Agreements Between Member States and Third Countries"[URL]
  30. "Regulation (EU) No 912/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for managing financial responsibility linked to investor-to-state dispute settlement tribunals established by international agreements to which the European Union is party"[URL]
  31. "한미 FAT", ~
  32. "2004 Dutch Model BIT", ~
  33. "EU-Cnanda CETA", ~
  34. "2004 US Model BIT", ~
  35. "2012 US Model BIT", ~
  36. "2004 Canadian Model BIT", ~
  37. "IIA MONITOR No. 3 (2009): Recent developments in international investment agreements" (2009)[URL]
  38. "BIT Review: Written Comments Concerning the Administration’s Review of the U.S. Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (Docket ID: USTR-2009-0019)", Transnational Dispute Management 7 (1), ~
  39. Denmark and Czech Republic working to terminate investment treaty; not all EU member-states agree with Czech view that intra-EU treaties are unnecessary, , ~ (2009)
  40. "Balance of Payment Manual"[URL]
  41. "Behchmark Definition of Foreign Direct Investment" (2008)[URL]
  42. Titi, Catharine, "The Evolving BIT: A Commentary on Canada’s Model Agreement", Investment Treaty News, ~ (2013)
  43. "EU members review intra-European BITs in light of potential overlap with EU Law" (2007)[URL]
  44. "EU member states rejects the call to terminate intra-EU bilateral investment treaties" (2009)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

리스본 조약 발효 이후 체결된 Canada-EU CETA 투자 분야 분석 및 우리나라 투자협정에의 시사점 고찰주현수법학연구소 · 홍익법학2013 · 제14권 제4호리스본조약과 공동통상정책: EU의 권한 변화를 중심으로이종서EU연구소 · EU연구2011 · 제29호최근의 EU 회원국간 양자투자협정과 투자자-국가 분쟁 동향 - Achmea BV v. Slovakia 사건을 중심으로-강성진한국중재학회 · 중재연구2018 · 제28권 제2호리스본 조약 이후 EU의 투자자-국가 분쟁 (Investor-State Dispute Settlement)관련 입법 동향 및 한국에의 시사점강성진동북아법연구소 · 동북아법연구2015 · 제8권 제3호CETA 투자자-국가간 분쟁해결제도에 대한 법적 고찰: 한국-캐나다 FTA와의 비교를 중심으로강준하법학연구소 · 홍익법학2019 · 제20권 제1호EU의 FTA사례 분석: 투자이슈를 중심으로임운택한국유럽학회 · 유럽연구2007 · 제25권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

한국산 유정용 강관(OCTG) 반덤핑관세 부과사건의 WTO협정 합치성 판단 - 반덤핑협정 제2.2.2조의 분석을 중심으로 -강민지pp. 1-28조례의 사법적 통제와 주요쟁점에 관한 법리의 검토고헌환pp. 29-50법원조정센터 운영현황과 발전방안에 대한 연구김성태pp. 51-70상법상 집행임원 보수결정절차에 관한 비판적 소고문상일pp. 71-89Administrative Internet Censorship by KCSC박경신pp. 91-115
원문 보기