게임산업발전을 위한 셧다운제도의 법정책적 재고- 셧다운제도과 관련하여 -

Abstract

Since the Internet games late at night (from midnight to 6 A.M) from 20th of Nov 2011. These measures to restrict Internet gaming during late-night hours are intened to prevent juvenile aged under 16 from getting addicted to such games, and to guarantee them adequate sleep for growth. However, The Internet games shutdown system has proveked a significant back lush for being several problems. The petition was filed against shutdown system in October 2011. Soon After, The Constitutional Court The Constitutional Court ruled that the Internet game shutdown system on April 24th, 2014. Decision of the Constitutional Court The Constitutional Court are as below. It does not violate the constitution of the shutdown system, the Youth Protection Act regulations. Freedom of job performance of the Internet gaming provider, juvenile behavior Liberty of kids aged 16, Parents does not infringe the right to education of children, Internet game regulate does not unlike another game, Unlike domestic game companie just do not infringe the right to equality by discipline Unlike foreign game companies. As such, Despite constitutional decision of the Constitutional Court the constitutional has caused fierce controversy of the civil society and public opinion. This claim of shutdown system are differing Lawmakers of the governing and opposition parties. Unlike the decision of the Constitutional Court shut down remain a possession of a constitutional law unconstitutional on top. It is necessary to have unity and balance of the whole and deregulation policies of the current government chairwoman. In addition, if the foreign national is rarely enforced the shutdown to limit korea has come forward directly to the game. This law possibly violates the constitution. In addition, the imbalance of the deregulation policy carried brings the gaming industry growing deteriorated. So I think we should abolish the law. if a significant burden on the legislature thinks it desirable to amend direction. Finally, the game industry growth is only the abolition of the second shutdown is not a problem. Game industry companies believe that the prevention andmanagement supervision on the internet game addiction in order to improve the corporate image and game industry companies do their social responsibility. Similarly, the game is also the country's cultural and national competitiveness. Overall, therefore, the control tower and hoping for the agency that oversees the game industry. It suggests that there is a need to revisit the game activation and regulation, including a couple of games collectively control tower agencies in charge of everything related to laws and institutions integrated in the game, such as activation and regulation limits.