CISG 제79조의 면책규정에 관한 각국 판례의 동향
Trends in national case law on the Exemption under Article 79 of the CISG
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The contract is to be observed. But it does not always mean that it should be followed up even if the breaching party is not liable to the breach of the contract. When the non-fulfillment of the contract that can not be attributed to the responsibility of the parties, it has been treated as a matter of force majeure, impossibility, frustration. The concept of impediment is adopted as a exemption from liability for damages rules in the CISG. Article 79 of the CISG says the requirements of the impediment. In this paper, we deal with the exemption from liability under Article 79 of the CISG in the case law of the countries. For this, we review Article 79 of the CISG in general, and major issues related to Article 79 of the CISG, such as breaches for which an exemption is available, exemption from liability for delivery of non-conforming goods, impediment requirement, non-performance attributable to third-party contractor, exemption in the case of sudden changes on the economy, impediment beyond party's control, impediment not foreseeable, impediment not avoidable or overcomeable and so on, by analyzing the national case law related to exemption from liability under Article 79 of the CISG. It will help the preparation for the fields and enhance the predictability in the interpretation of the Article 79 of the CISG.
Abstract
The contract is to be observed. But it does not always mean that it should be followed up even if the breaching party is not liable to the breach of the contract. When the non-fulfillment of the contract that can not be attributed to the responsibility of the parties, it has been treated as a matter of force majeure, impossibility, frustration. The concept of impediment is adopted as a exemption from liability for damages rules in the CISG. Article 79 of the CISG says the requirements of the impediment. In this paper, we deal with the exemption from liability under Article 79 of the CISG in the case law of the countries. For this, we review Article 79 of the CISG in general, and major issues related to Article 79 of the CISG, such as breaches for which an exemption is available, exemption from liability for delivery of non-conforming goods, impediment requirement, non-performance attributable to third-party contractor, exemption in the case of sudden changes on the economy, impediment beyond party's control, impediment not foreseeable, impediment not avoidable or overcomeable and so on, by analyzing the national case law related to exemption from liability under Article 79 of the CISG. It will help the preparation for the fields and enhance the predictability in the interpretation of the Article 79 of the CISG.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김선국, "불가항력 및 사정변경의 원칙에 관한 계약과 관련한 주요 국제적인 규범들 규정의 비교.검토 - UNIDROIT Principles, PECL 및 CISG를 중심으로 -", 기업법연구, 13, pp.229~245 (2003), 한국기업법학회
- 2010, , ~
- 안강현, "UNIDROIT 국제상사계약원칙에 있어서의 Hardship", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.7~221 (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 오원석, "면책법리에 관한 비교법적 연구-CISG를 중심으로-", 무역학회지, 26(3) (2001)
- 우보연, "용선계약에서의 프러스트레이션 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, 해사법학, pp.2008
- 이기수, "국제거래법" (2015), 세창출판사
- 이천수, "국제물품매매계약에서 면책요건에 관한 사례연구", (사)한국산업경제학회 추계국제학술발표대회 논문집 (2014)
- 이천수, "UNIDROIT Principles에서 면책규정에 관한 연구", 산업경제연구, 26(5), pp.2191~2208 (2013), 한국산업경제학회
- 이천수, "CISG에서 면책요건의 적용에 관한 연구", 무역연구, 11(1), pp.121~138 (2015), 한국무역연구원
- 진도왕, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 협약(CISG) 제79조와 부적합물품의인도", 국제거래법연구, 24(1), pp.1~19 (2015), 국제거래법학회
- 진도왕, "민사법의 이론과 실무" (2015)
- 蔡鎭益, "CISG上의 國際物品賣買契約上 義務不履行에 대한 免責基準", 무역학회지, 27(2), pp.167~190 (2002), 한국무역학회
- 최준선, "국제거래법 제8판" (2013), 삼영사
- 최준선, "로스쿨국제거래법(이론과 사례)" (2011), 박영사
- 최현숙, "사정변경의 원칙과 CISG에서의 면책조항에 관한 비교연구", 사회과학연구, 23(2), pp.149~171 (2007), 사회과학연구소
- 최홍섭, "유엔국제물품매매협약에서 손해배상책임의 면책요건과 면책사유-CISG 제79조를 중심으로-", 국제거래법연구, 13 (2014)
- 홍석모, "국제물품매매협약(CISG) 면책조항의 분석 및 관련분쟁 대비책", 법학연구, (52), pp.383~400 (2013), 한국법학회
- "CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 7. Exemption of Liability for Damages Under Article 79 of the CISG", ~
- UNCITRAL, "UNCITRAL Digest of Case Law on the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (2012 Edition)", ~ (2012)
- Brandon Nagy, "Unreliable Excuses: How do Differing Persuasive Interpretations of CISG Article 79 Affect its Goal of Harmony?", N.Y. Int’l L. Rev, 26, pp.61~ (2013)
- Harry Flechtner, "Article 79 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) as Rorschach Test: The Homeward Trend and Exemption for Delivering Non-Conforming Goods", Pace Int’l L. Rev, 19, pp.29~ (2007)
- Jenni Miettinen, "Economic impediment as grounds for exemption from liability in the scope of CISG Article 79", VJ, 18, pp.227~ (2014)
- Nimrat Kaur, "Impediment: A Concept Under Cisg, Unidroit and Indian Contract Law – A Comparative Analysis", VJ, 15, pp.91~ (2011)
- Sarah Howard Jenkins, "Exemption for Nonperformance: UCC, CISG, UNIDROIT Principles - A Comparative Assessment", Tul.L.Rev, 72, pp.2015~ (1998)