본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Japanese Mo: Universal, Additive, and NPI

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper discusses four distinct functions of the Japanese particle mo, namely, (i) the universal quantificational use of mo with an indeterminate; (ii) mo within a negative polarity item containing an indeterminate; (iii) mo within a negative polarity item functioning as a minimizer; and (iv) additive mo. Starting with Shimoyama (2001, 2006) and a significantly modified adaptation of Kobuchi-Philip’s (2008a) analysis of universal quantifcational mo, this paper proposes a unified semantic analysis of all four uses of mo. It is argued that X-mo is syntactically an adjunct, and that its semantics involves (i) a condition of membership in the denotation of the DP construed with the mo-phrase (the Condition of Inclusion in Moltmann 1995), (ii) a condition of membership in the predicate denotation, and (iii) a condition requiring the existence of an additional element with the same properties as the referent of what mo syntactically combines with.

Abstract

This paper discusses four distinct functions of the Japanese particle mo, namely, (i) the universal quantificational use of mo with an indeterminate; (ii) mo within a negative polarity item containing an indeterminate; (iii) mo within a negative polarity item functioning as a minimizer; and (iv) additive mo. Starting with Shimoyama (2001, 2006) and a significantly modified adaptation of Kobuchi-Philip’s (2008a) analysis of universal quantifcational mo, this paper proposes a unified semantic analysis of all four uses of mo. It is argued that X-mo is syntactically an adjunct, and that its semantics involves (i) a condition of membership in the denotation of the DP construed with the mo-phrase (the Condition of Inclusion in Moltmann 1995), (ii) a condition of membership in the predicate denotation, and (iii) a condition requiring the existence of an additional element with the same properties as the referent of what mo syntactically combines with.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Aoyagi,H, ""On Association with Focus and Scope of Focus Particles in Japanese."In M.Koizumi & H.Ura(eds.)Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1.23-44.Cambridge,MA:MITWPL", Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics, 1, pp.23~44 (1994), Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
  2. Barwise, J, "Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language", Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.159~219 (1981)
  3. Hagstrom,P, "Decomposing questions", Ph.D, Diss. MIT, pp.1998
  4. Hamblin,C, "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
  5. Heycock,C, "Syntactic predication in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.167~211 (1993)
  6. Horn,L, "A presuppositional analysis of only and even", In Proceedings of the 24th North Eastern Linguistics Society Conference, pp.157~171 (1969), Amherst: GLSA
  7. Horn,L, "On the semantic properties of logical operators in English", Ph.D, pp.1972
  8. Horn,L, "natural history of negation" (1989), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
  9. Karttunen, L, "Conventional implicature", pp.1~56 (1979), New York: Academic Press
  10. Kataoka,K, "Nihongo hiteibun-no koozoo. (The structure of Japanese negative sentences.)" (2006), Tokyo: Kuroshio.
  11. Kato,Y, "Negative sentences in Japanese", Ph.D, pp.1985
  12. Kobuchi-Philip,M, "Identity of the domain of quantification for the numeral", pp.27~290 (2006), Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  13. Kobuchi-Philip, M, "A modifier hypothesis on the Japanese indeterminate quantifier phrase", pp.201~213 (2008), Berlin: Springer
  14. Kobuchi-Philip, M, "A unified semantic analysis of Japanese mo", pp.773~776 (2008), Seoul: The Korean Society for Cognitive Science.
  15. Kobuchi-Philip,M, "Shika-no imi oyobi hitei-to-no kyookiriyuu (Semantics of shika and its co-occurrence with negation)", Proceedings of the 138th meeting of Linguistic Society of Japan, pp.308~313 (2009), Kyoto: Linguistic Society of Japan
  16. Landman,F, "Events and plurality" (2000), Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  17. Link,G, "The logical analysis of plural and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach", pp.302~323 (1983), Berlin: de Gruyter
  18. Moltmann,F, "Exception phrases and polyadic quantification", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.223~280 (1995)
  19. Nishigauchi,T, "Quantification in the theory of grammar" (1990), Dordrecht: Kluwer
  20. “Mo.”Papers on quantification. NSF Grant Report, "Ohno,Y", MA: GLSA, 224~250 (1989)
  21. Partee,B, "Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles", pp.115~143 (1987), Dordrecht: Foris
  22. Soams,S, "Presupposition", pp.533~616 (1989), Dordrecht: Reidel
  23. Shimoyama,J, "Wh-constructions in Japanese", Ph.D., pp.2001
  24. Shimoyama,J, "Indeterminate phrase quantification in Japanese", Natural Language Semantics, 14, pp.139~173 (2006)
  25. Shudo,S, "Presupposition and discourse" (2002), New York: Routledge.
  26. von Stechow,A, "Against LF pied-piping", Natural Language Semantics, 4, pp.57~110 (1996)
  27. Watanabe,A, "-in-situ, subjacency, and chain formation", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 2 (1992), Cambridge MA: MITWPL
  28. Watanabe,A, "The genesis of negative concord: syntax and morphology of negative doubling", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.559~612 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)