본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

핸드볼 지도자의 리더십이 팀 갈등과 조직유효성에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Handball Coaches' Leadership on Team Conflicts and Organizational Effectiveness

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of handball coaches' leadership on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness. Specifically, this study aims to reveal a effective leadership type effective to establish handball players' positive organizational effectiveness. Based on the results, the study will present the relationship of the most effective leadership types that handball players give a positive effect on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness according to team's structural and cultural characteristics. The study will also provide basic information for efficient coaching in coach leadership. For the purpose, 339 handball players in national middle and high schools were sampled using cluster random sampling. A questionnaire survey was used as a data collection instrument. The instrument whose reliability and validity was tested in previous researches at home and aborad was modified and added for the purpose of the study. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 46 items: demographic characteristics(6 items), leadership(23 items), task conflict(4 items) and relationship conflict(4 items) of team conflict, and job satisfaction(5 items) and job achievement(4 items) of organizational effectiveness. After validity and reliability was tested based on previous researches and data, the questionnaire was distributed and returned. Questionnaires which included insincere and unreliable answers were excluded from analysis. Analyzable data was used for data processing. One researcher and two assistants visited players for a questionnaire survey. The purpose and contents of the study and response cautions were explained to subject handball players. Self-administration was used to complete items and completed questionnaires were returned. Insincere and unreliable data which included a dual response and were not responded were excluded from analysis. Data were inputted and data processing was made for the purpose of analysis, using a Window SPSS 18.0 statistics program. Statistics methods used for the study included frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. First, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was conducted to secure questionnaire validity and α coefficient was calculated for internal consistency by sub-concept to analyze reliability. Second, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship among leadership, team conflicts, and organizational effectiveness in handball coaches. The significance level was set at α=.05. The effects of handball coaches' leadership type on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness were analyzed through the above methodology and procedures. The results were as follows. First, handball coaches' leadership types had a significant effect on team conflicts. Second, handball coaches' leadership types had a significant effect on organizational effectiveness. Third, handball coaches' leadership types, team conflicts, and organizational effectiveness were correlated.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of handball coaches' leadership on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness. Specifically, this study aims to reveal a effective leadership type effective to establish handball players' positive organizational effectiveness. Based on the results, the study will present the relationship of the most effective leadership types that handball players give a positive effect on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness according to team's structural and cultural characteristics. The study will also provide basic information for efficient coaching in coach leadership. For the purpose, 339 handball players in national middle and high schools were sampled using cluster random sampling. A questionnaire survey was used as a data collection instrument. The instrument whose reliability and validity was tested in previous researches at home and aborad was modified and added for the purpose of the study. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 46 items: demographic characteristics(6 items), leadership(23 items), task conflict(4 items) and relationship conflict(4 items) of team conflict, and job satisfaction(5 items) and job achievement(4 items) of organizational effectiveness. After validity and reliability was tested based on previous researches and data, the questionnaire was distributed and returned. Questionnaires which included insincere and unreliable answers were excluded from analysis. Analyzable data was used for data processing. One researcher and two assistants visited players for a questionnaire survey. The purpose and contents of the study and response cautions were explained to subject handball players. Self-administration was used to complete items and completed questionnaires were returned. Insincere and unreliable data which included a dual response and were not responded were excluded from analysis. Data were inputted and data processing was made for the purpose of analysis, using a Window SPSS 18.0 statistics program. Statistics methods used for the study included frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. First, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was conducted to secure questionnaire validity and α coefficient was calculated for internal consistency by sub-concept to analyze reliability. Second, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship among leadership, team conflicts, and organizational effectiveness in handball coaches. The significance level was set at α=.05. The effects of handball coaches' leadership type on team conflicts and organizational effectiveness were analyzed through the above methodology and procedures. The results were as follows. First, handball coaches' leadership types had a significant effect on team conflicts. Second, handball coaches' leadership types had a significant effect on organizational effectiveness. Third, handball coaches' leadership types, team conflicts, and organizational effectiveness were correlated.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 김기황, "골프지도자의 리더십유형과 조직구조, 조직문화 및 조직유효성에 관한 연구", 박사, 스포츠·태권도학과, pp.2012
  2. 김영환, "리더십이 조직갈등과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 박사, 행정학, pp.2010
  3. 김정하, "스포츠 행정조직의 권력유형과 조직효과성의 관계", 박사, pp.1999
  4. 김창한, "서번트 리더십이 호텔종사원의이직의도에 미치는 영향", 사회과학연구, 12, pp.265~282 (2006)
  5. 김태훈, "직업무용단윈의 의사소통과 조직유효성의 관계", 박사, pp.2006
  6. 남기일, "프로축구 지도자의 리더십유형에 따른 조직유효성 결정요인에 관한 연구 : 거래적, 변혁적, 서번트 리더십을 중심으로", 박사, 스포츠산업경영, pp.2009
  7. 문인선, "리더십 상황이론의 실증적 연구", 석사, pp.1985
  8. 박성계, "스포츠 센터내 커뮤니케이션이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향", 한국체육학회, 39(1), pp.716~726 (2000)
  9. 박수진, "스포츠센터 경영자의 리더십이 구성원의 임파워먼트와 조직유효성에 미치는 영향", 석사, 체육학, pp.2007
  10. 박원우, "다수준분석의 절차와 방법", 경영논집, 59(1), pp.59~90 (2005)
  11. 박경혜, "태권도지도자의 리더십유형이 조직문화 및 조직유효성에 미치는 영향", 박사, 체육학, pp.2008
  12. 안규욱, "상사의 리더십 유형이 조직구성원의 핵심역량(Core Competency)제고에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구-거래적 리더십과 변혁적 리더십을 중심으로-", 경영사연구, (45), pp.145~175 (2007), 한국경영사학회[DOI]
  13. 梁嘉鉉, "韓國企業의 組織文化와 有效性에 관한 연구", 박사, 경영학, pp.1992
  14. 윤경신, "핸드볼 감독의 리더십과 선수의 자기관리, 팀문화 인식 및 경기력 간의 구조모형 연구", 박사, 스포츠·태권도학전공, pp.2013
  15. 윤형기, "대학 축구 팀 리더십과 팀성과의 경로 모형", 한국 스포츠 리서치, 15(2), pp.163~174 (2004), 한국스포츠리서치
  16. 이상행, "스포츠 조직의 구조적 특성과 조직 유효성의 관계", 한국스포츠사회, 6, pp.11~28 (1996)
  17. 이용현, "개인 지각인가, 팀 지각인가? 팀 심리측정의 타당성 확보를 위한 다수준 분석의 적용", 한국스포츠심리학회지, 21(3), pp.71~81 (2010), 한국스포츠심리학회
  18. 이은주, "서번트리더십 유형이 병원종사자 직무만족과 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 석사, ?, pp.2006
  19. 조송현, "체육행정 구성원의 의사소통이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.1998
  20. 최보인, "다양성이 팀 프로세스 및 팀 유효성에 미치는 영향과 과업 상호의존성 및 변혁적리더십의 조절효과 연구", 박사, pp.2014
  21. Atwater, D. C., "Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership" (1994), Sage
  22. Bass, B. M., "Stogdill’s handbook of leadership" (1981), Free Press
  23. Bass, B. M., "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" (1985), Free Press
  24. Bass, B. M., "From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision", Organization Dynamics, 18(3), pp.19~36 (1990)
  25. Carron, A., "Social Psychology of Sport" (1980), Movement Press
  26. Hollander, E. P., "Ethical challenges in the leader-follower relationship", Business Ethics Quarterly, 5, pp.55~65 (1995)
  27. Hollenbeck, J. R., "The multilevel of theory of team decision-making : Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise", Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, pp.292~316 (1995)
  28. Jehn, K., "A multimeth odexamination of the benefit sand detriments of intragroup conflict", Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, pp.256~282 (1995)
  29. Klein, K. J., "Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis", Academy of Management Review, 19, pp.195~229 (1994)
  30. Likert, "New Patterns of Management" (1961), McGraw-Hill
  31. Pearce, C. L., "Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership" (2003), Sage
  32. Silva, J. M., "Psychological foundations of sport" (2002), Benjamin-Cummings Pub Co
  33. Smith C. G., "A Comparative Analysis of Some Conditions and Consequences of intra Organizational Conflict", Administrative Science Quaterly, 10(4), pp.504~529 (1966)
  34. Stevens, M. J., "The knowledge, skills and ability requirements for t eamwork : I mplications f or h uman r esources management", Journal of Management, 20, pp.502~528 (1994)
  35. Sundstromet, E., "Work teams : Applications and effectiveness", American Psychologist, 45, pp.120~133 (1990)
  36. Yammarino, F. J., "The Handbook of Work Group Psychology" (1996), Wiley

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)