Surface characteristics of thermally treated titanium surfaces
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The characteristics of oxidized titanium (Ti) surfaces varied according to treatment conditions such as duration time and temperature. Thermal oxidation can change Ti surface characteristics, which affect many cellular responses such as cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the surface characteristics and cell response of thermally treated Ti surfaces. Methods: The samples were divided into 4 groups. Control: machined smooth titanium (Ti-S) was untreated. Group I: Ti-S was treated in a furnace at 300°C for 30 minutes. Group II: Ti-S was treated at 500°C for 30 minutes. Group III: Ti-S was treated at 750°C for 30 minutes. A scanning electron microscope, atomic force microscope, and X-ray diffraction were used to assess surface characteristics and chemical composition. The water contact angle and surface energy were measured to assess physical properties. Results: The titanium dioxide (TiO2) thickness increased as the treatment temperature increased. Additional peaks belonging to rutile TiO2 were only found in group III. The contact angle in group III was significantly lower than any of the other groups. The surface energy significantly increased as the treatment temperature increased, especially in group III. In the 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, after 24 hours of incubation, the assessment of cell viability showed that the optical density of the control had a higher tendency than any other group, but there was no significant difference. However,the alkaline phosphatase activity increased as the temperature increased, especially in group III. Conclusions: Consequently, the surface characteristics and biocompatibility increased as the temperature increased. This indicates that surface modification by thermal treatment could be another useful method for medical and dental implants.
Abstract
Purpose: The characteristics of oxidized titanium (Ti) surfaces varied according to treatment conditions such as duration time and temperature. Thermal oxidation can change Ti surface characteristics, which affect many cellular responses such as cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the surface characteristics and cell response of thermally treated Ti surfaces. Methods: The samples were divided into 4 groups. Control: machined smooth titanium (Ti-S) was untreated. Group I: Ti-S was treated in a furnace at 300°C for 30 minutes. Group II: Ti-S was treated at 500°C for 30 minutes. Group III: Ti-S was treated at 750°C for 30 minutes. A scanning electron microscope, atomic force microscope, and X-ray diffraction were used to assess surface characteristics and chemical composition. The water contact angle and surface energy were measured to assess physical properties. Results: The titanium dioxide (TiO2) thickness increased as the treatment temperature increased. Additional peaks belonging to rutile TiO2 were only found in group III. The contact angle in group III was significantly lower than any of the other groups. The surface energy significantly increased as the treatment temperature increased, especially in group III. In the 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, after 24 hours of incubation, the assessment of cell viability showed that the optical density of the control had a higher tendency than any other group, but there was no significant difference. However,the alkaline phosphatase activity increased as the temperature increased, especially in group III. Conclusions: Consequently, the surface characteristics and biocompatibility increased as the temperature increased. This indicates that surface modification by thermal treatment could be another useful method for medical and dental implants.
참고문헌 (28)
- Kasemo B, "Aspects of surface physics on titanium implants", Swed Dent J Suppl, 28, pp.19~36 (1985)
- Zitter H, "The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as an indicator of their biocompatibility", J Biomed Mater Res, 21, pp.881~896 (1987)
- Solar RJ, "In vitro corrosion testing of titanium surgical implant alloys: an approach to understanding titanium release from implants", J Biomed Mater Res, 13, pp.217~250 (1979)
- Tengvall P, "Physico-chemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial", Clin Mater, 9, pp.115~134 (1992)
- Branemark PI, "Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 3, pp.81~100 (1969)
- Van Noort R, "Titanium: the implant material of today", J Mater Sci, 22, pp.3801~3811 (1987)
- Albrektsson T, "Interface analysis of titanium and zirconium bone implants", Biomaterials, 6, pp.97~101 (1985)
- Feng B, "Characterization of surface oxide films on titanium and bioactivity", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 13, pp.457~464 (2002)
- Madhav Prasad Neupane, "Characterization of Surface Oxide Films and Cell Toxicity Evaluations with a Quenched Titanium Surface", Metals and Materials International, 14(4), pp.443~448 (2008), 대한금속·재료학회
- Titanium oxide film fracture and repassivation: the effect of potential, pH and aeration, "Gilbert JL", ASTM special technical publication, ~ (1996)
- Choi JW, "Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages", J Oral Rehabil, 33, pp.889~897 (2006)
- Pilliar RM, "Medical device materials" (2004), ASM International
- Sunny MC, "Titanium-protein interaction: changes with oxide layer thickness", J Biomater Appl, 6, pp.89~98 (1991)
- Byun C, "Anatase-to-rutile transition of titania thin films prepared by MOCVD", Mater Res Bull, 32, pp.431~440 (1997)
- Barksdale J, "Titanium, its occurrence, chemistry, and technology", Soil Sci, 70, pp.414~ (1950)
- Lim YJ, "Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.333~342 (2001)
- Schrader ME, "On adhesion of biological substances to low-energy solid-surfaces", J Colloid Interface Sci, 88, pp.296~297 (1982)
- Schakenraad JM, "The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins", J Biomed Mater Res, 20, pp.773~784 (1986)
- Anselme K, "Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 17, pp.471~479 (2006)
- Boyan BD, "Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies", Eur Cell Mater, 6, pp.22~27 (2003)
- Passeri G, "Adhesion pattern and growth of primary human osteoblastic cells on five commercially available titanium surfaces", Clin Oral Implants Res, 21, pp.756~765 (2010)
- van Oss CJ, "Monopolar surfaces", Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 28, pp.35~64 (1987)
- Anselme K, "Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials", Biomaterials, 21, pp.667~681 (2000)
- Vaquila I, "Chemical reactions at surfaces: titanium oxidation", Surf Coat Technol, 122, pp.67~71 (1999)
- Jones P, "Infra-red studies of rutile surfaces. Part 2. Hydroxylation, hydration and structure of rutile surfaces", Trans Faraday Soc, 67, pp.2679~2685 (1971)
- Schwartz Z, "Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage", Adv Dent Res, 13, pp.38~48 (1999)
- Gerstenfeld LC, "Expression of differentiated function by mineralizing cultures of chicken osteoblasts", Dev Biol, 122, pp.49~60 (1987)
- Combe EC, "A protocol for determining the surface free energy of dental materials", Dent Mater, 20, pp.262~268 (2004)