Surface properties and early murine pre-osteoblastic cell responses of anodized TiO2 surfaces
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The noted anodic oxidation of titanium surfaces by the utilization of an electrochemical method is one of the procedures that can be used for the enhancement of osseointegration. This study evaluated the surface characteristics and the cell response of titanium samples that were modified by different treatment conditions. The samples were subsequently divided into 4 groups. In this study, Group I was noted as an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 30 sec. Further, Group II was noted as using an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 60 sec. Also, Group III was an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 90 sec. The control was a non-treated machined titanium surface. The results were as follows: the XRD analysis showed that the crystallinity of anodic oxide film was composed of anatase and rutile. The study continued with the procedure of increasing the time for anodization, whereby it was noted that the intensity of the TiO2 peaks for anatase phase decreased, while the TiO2 peak for the rutile phase was seen to have increased. In the MTT assay, it was noted that there was no significant difference in the response of fetal rat calvarial cells to the anodized titanium surfaces with the different treatment conditions. Similarly, the Group II and III showed higher ALP activity levels compared with the control and Group I (p<0.01). In the RT-PCR analysis, it is noted that the bone sialoprotein mRNA expression in Group II and III increased approximately 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold respectively, compared with the control, which was cp-Ti. The osteocalcin mRNA expression in Group II and III also increased approximately 1.6-fold and 1.7-fold respectively, compared with the control. Fundamentally, these results suggest that the anodized TiO2 surfaces treated at 60 and 90 sec, should promote cellular activity of the noted and reviewed osteoblasts, as compared with the machined Ti surface.
Abstract
The noted anodic oxidation of titanium surfaces by the utilization of an electrochemical method is one of the procedures that can be used for the enhancement of osseointegration. This study evaluated the surface characteristics and the cell response of titanium samples that were modified by different treatment conditions. The samples were subsequently divided into 4 groups. In this study, Group I was noted as an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 30 sec. Further, Group II was noted as using an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 60 sec. Also, Group III was an anodized TiO2 film using a constant voltage, 270 V for 90 sec. The control was a non-treated machined titanium surface. The results were as follows: the XRD analysis showed that the crystallinity of anodic oxide film was composed of anatase and rutile. The study continued with the procedure of increasing the time for anodization, whereby it was noted that the intensity of the TiO2 peaks for anatase phase decreased, while the TiO2 peak for the rutile phase was seen to have increased. In the MTT assay, it was noted that there was no significant difference in the response of fetal rat calvarial cells to the anodized titanium surfaces with the different treatment conditions. Similarly, the Group II and III showed higher ALP activity levels compared with the control and Group I (p<0.01). In the RT-PCR analysis, it is noted that the bone sialoprotein mRNA expression in Group II and III increased approximately 1.7-fold and 1.5-fold respectively, compared with the control, which was cp-Ti. The osteocalcin mRNA expression in Group II and III also increased approximately 1.6-fold and 1.7-fold respectively, compared with the control. Fundamentally, these results suggest that the anodized TiO2 surfaces treated at 60 and 90 sec, should promote cellular activity of the noted and reviewed osteoblasts, as compared with the machined Ti surface.
참고문헌 (21)
- Long M, "Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective", Biomaterials, 19, pp.1621~1639 (1998)[DOI]
- Hench LL, "Bioactive materials: the potential for tissue regeneration", J Biomed Mater Res, 41, pp.511~518 (1998)[DOI]
- Li D, "Biochemical comparison of the sand blasted and acid etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants", J Biomed Mater Res, 60, pp.325~332 (2002)[DOI]
- Okazaki Y, "Comparison of metal concentration in rat tibia tissues with various metallic implants", Biomaterials, 25, pp.5913~5920 (2004)[DOI]
- Okazaki Y, "Comparison of metal release from various metallic biomaterals in vitro", Biomaterials, 26, pp.11~21 (2005)[DOI]
- Yao C, "Anodization: a promising nano-modification technique of titanium implants for orthopedic applications", J Nanosci Nanotechn, 6, pp.2682~2692 (2006)[DOI]
- Ishizawa H, "Characterization of thin hydroxyapaptite layers formed on anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P by hydrothermal treatment", J Biomed Mater Res, 29, pp.1071~1078 (1995)[DOI]
- Yang B, "Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment", Biomaterials, 25, pp.1003~1009 (2004)[DOI]
- Park KH, "Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study", J Oral Rehabil, 34, pp.517~527 (2007)[DOI]
- Eun-Ju Oh, "Enhanced compatibility and initial stability of Ti6Al4V alloy orthodontic miniscrews subjected to anodization, cyclic precalcification, and heat treatment", 대한치과교정학회지, 44(5), pp.246~253 (2014), 대한치과교정학회
- Kim MH, "Cell adhesion and in vivo osseointegration of sandblasted", acid etched, Int J Mol Sci, pp.2015, 16[DOI]
- Saldana L, "Osteoblast response to thermally oxidized Ti6Al4V alloy", J Biomed Mater Res A, 73, pp.97~107 (2005)
- Park IS, "Surface characteristics of the anodized and hydrothermally treated titanium affected by the current density, voltage, and time", Adv Mater Res, 29, pp.63~66 (2007)
- Bumgardner JD, "Contact angle, protein adsorption and osteoblast precusor cell attachment to chitosan coatings bonded to titanium", J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 14, pp.1401~1409 (2003)[DOI]
- Kawahara H, "In vitro study on bone formation and surface topography from the standpoint of biomechanics", J Mat Sci, 15, pp.1297~1307 (2004)
- 조인구, "백서 태자 두개관세포에서 Ti-8Ta-3Nb 합금의 생체적합성", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 36(4), pp.849~861 (2006), 대한치주과학회
- Kim JH, "The effect of nanotubular titanium surfaces on osteoblast differentiation", J Nanosci Nanotechn, 10, pp.3581~3585 (2010)[DOI]
- Oh S, "Significantly accelerated osteoblast cell growth on aligned TiO2 nanotubes", J Biomed Mater Res, 78, pp.97~103 (2006)
- Lian JB, "Species-specific glucocorticoid and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D responsiveness in mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts: dexamethasone inhibits osteoblast differentiation and vitamin D down-regulates osteocalcin gene expression", Endocrinology, 138, pp.2117~2127 (1997)[DOI]
- Schmalz G, "Use of cell cultures for toxicity testing of dental materials-advantages and limitations", J Dent, 22, pp.S6~S11 (1994)[DOI]
- Ganss B, "Bone sialoprotein", Crit Rev Oral Biol Med, 10, pp.79~98 (1999)[DOI]