Effect of the restorative technique on load-bearing capacity, cusp deflection, and stress distribution of endodontically-treated premolars with MOD restoration
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the restorative technique on the mechanical response of endodontically-treated upper premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight premolars received MOD preparation (4 groups, n = 12) with different restorative techniques: glass ionomer cement + composite resin (the GIC group), a metallic post + composite resin (the MP group), a fiberglass post + composite resin (the FGP group), or no endodontic treatment + restoration with composite resin (the CR group). Cusp strain and load-bearing capacity were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used with α = 5%. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to calculate displacement and tensile stress for the teeth and restorations. Results: MP showed the highest cusp (p = 0.027) deflection (24.28 ± 5.09 µm/µm), followed by FGP (20.61 ± 5.05 µm/µm), CR (17.72 ± 6.32 µm/µm), and GIC (17.62 ± 7.00 µm/µm). For load-bearing, CR (38.89 ± 3.24 N) showed the highest, followed by GIC (37.51 ± 6.69 N), FGP (29.80 ± 10.03 N), and MP (18.41 ± 4.15 N) (p = 0.001) value. FEA showed similar behavior in the restorations in all groups, while MP showed the highest stress concentration in the tooth and post. Conclusions: There is no mechanical advantage in using intraradicular posts for endodontically-treated premolars requiring MOD restoration. Filling the pulp chamber with GIC and restoring the tooth with only CR showed the most promising results for cusp deflection, failure load, and stress distribution.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the restorative technique on the mechanical response of endodontically-treated upper premolars with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity. Materials and Methods: Forty-eight premolars received MOD preparation (4 groups, n = 12) with different restorative techniques: glass ionomer cement + composite resin (the GIC group), a metallic post + composite resin (the MP group), a fiberglass post + composite resin (the FGP group), or no endodontic treatment + restoration with composite resin (the CR group). Cusp strain and load-bearing capacity were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used with α = 5%. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to calculate displacement and tensile stress for the teeth and restorations. Results: MP showed the highest cusp (p = 0.027) deflection (24.28 ± 5.09 µm/µm), followed by FGP (20.61 ± 5.05 µm/µm), CR (17.72 ± 6.32 µm/µm), and GIC (17.62 ± 7.00 µm/µm). For load-bearing, CR (38.89 ± 3.24 N) showed the highest, followed by GIC (37.51 ± 6.69 N), FGP (29.80 ± 10.03 N), and MP (18.41 ± 4.15 N) (p = 0.001) value. FEA showed similar behavior in the restorations in all groups, while MP showed the highest stress concentration in the tooth and post. Conclusions: There is no mechanical advantage in using intraradicular posts for endodontically-treated premolars requiring MOD restoration. Filling the pulp chamber with GIC and restoring the tooth with only CR showed the most promising results for cusp deflection, failure load, and stress distribution.
참고문헌 (37)
- Popescu SM, "Root fractures : epidemiological, clinical and radiographic aspects", Rom J Morphol Embryol, 58, pp.501~506 (2017)
- Bastone EB, "Epidemiology of dental trauma : a review of the literature", Aust Dent J, 45, pp.2~9 (2000)
- Rho YJ, "Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities : a retrospective study", Oper Dent, 38, pp.572~582 (2013)
- Tribst JP, "Simulation of mouthguard use in preventing dental injuries caused by different impacts in sports activities", Sport Sci Health, 15, pp.85~90 (2019)
- Teixeira ES, "Fracture strength of the remaining dental structure after different cavity preparation designs", Gen Dent, 64, pp.33~36 (2016)
- Laske M, "Risk factors for dental restoration survival : a practice-based study", J Dent Res, 98, pp.414~422 (2019)
- Mergulhão VA, "Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with different methods", Oper Dent, 44, pp.E1~E11 (2019)
- Tang W, "Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth", J Endod, 36, pp.609~617 (2010)
- de Andrade GS, "A study on stress distribution to cement layer and root dentin for post and cores made of CAD", CAM materials with different elasticity modulus in the absence of ferrule, 2019, pp.11, e1~e8
- Dal Piva AM, "Do mechanical advantages exist in relining fiber posts with composite prior to its cementation?", J Adhes Dent, 20, pp.511~518 (2018)
- da Fonseca GF, "Computer-aided design finite element modeling of different approaches to rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 18, pp.329~335 (2018)
- Barcellos RR, "Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with intra-radicular post : the effects of post system and dentine thickness", J Biomech, 46, pp.2572~2577 (2013)
- Ausiello P, "3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites", J Biomech, 34, pp.1269~1277 (2001)
- Srivastava B, "Comparative evaluation of various temperature changes on stress distribution in class II mesial-occlusal-distal preparation restored with different restorative materials : a finite element analysis", Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 11, pp.167~170 (2018)
- Lee MR, "Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration", Dent Mater, 23, pp.288~295 (2007)
- Nothdurft FP, "The fracture behavior of premolar teeth with class II cavities restored by both direct composite restorations and endodontic post systems", J Dent, 36, pp.444~449 (2008)
- Nothdurft FP, "Influence of endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with Class II cavities", J Dent, 36, pp.287~293 (2008)
- Hofmann N, "The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro", Clin Oral Investig, 2, pp.77~83 (1998)
- Ausiello PP, "Mechanical behavior of Class I cavities restored by different material combinations under loading and polymerization shrinkage stress. A 3D-FEA study", Am J Dent, 32, pp.55~60 (2019)
- Victória Luswarghi Souza Costa, "Influence of thickness and incisal extension of indirect veneers on the biomechanical behavior of maxillary canine teeth", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 43(4), pp.1~13 (2018), 대한치과보존학회[DOI]
- Sousa MP, "Capacity to maintain placement torque at removal, single load-to-failure, and stress concentration of straight and angled abutments", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 39, pp.213~218 (2019)
- Costa VL, "Influence of the occlusal contacts in formation of Abfraction Lesions in the upper premolar", Braz Dent Sci, 20, pp.115~123 (2017)
- Tribst JP, "Biomechanical behavior of indirect composite materials : a 3D-FEA study", Braz Dent Sci, 20, pp.52~57 (2017)
- Ausiello P, "CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials", Dent Mater, 33, pp.1456~1465 (2017)
- Monteiro JB, "The effect of resection angle on stress distribution after root-end surgery", Iran Endod J, 13, pp.188~194 (2018)
- Gloria A, "Metal posts and the effect of material–shape combination on the mechanical behavior of endodontically treated anterior teeth", Metals(Basel), 9, pp.125~ (2019)
- Rafael Menezes-Silva, "Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months", Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(9), pp.3623~3635 (2019), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Kim ME, "Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods", Oper Dent, 36, pp.326~334 (2011)
- Braga S, "The effects of cavity preparation and composite resin on bond strength and stress distribution using the microtensile bond test", Oper Dent, 43, pp.81~89 (2018)
- Santos SS, "Resin-modified glass ionomer containing calcium glycerophosphate : physico-mechanical properties and enamel demineralization", J Appl Oral Sci, 27, pp.e20180188~ (2019)
- Jones G, "Glass ionomer or composite resin for primary molars", Evid Based Dent, 19, pp.86~87 (2018)
- Wang X, "Evaluation of fiber posts vs metal posts for restoring severely damaged endodontically treated teeth : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Quintessence Int, 50, pp.8~20 (2019)
- Elsharkasi MM, "Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill resin-based composite materials", Oper Dent, 43, pp.E1~E9 (2018)
- Yarmohamadi E, "Comparison of cuspal deflection and microleakage of premolar teeth restored with three restorative materials", J Contemp Dent Pract, 19, pp.684~689 (2018)
- Tribst JP, "Influence of restoration thickness on the stress distribution of ultrathin ceramic onlay rehabilitating canine guidance : a 3D-finite element analysis", Minerva Stomatol, 68, pp.126~131 (2019)
- Heikkinen TT, "Long term water storage deteriorates bonding of composite resin to alumina and zirconia short communication", Open Dent J, 7, pp.123~125 (2013)
- Ausiello P, "Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling", Dent Mater, 33, pp.690~701 (2017)