The effect of silane and universal adhesives on the micro-shear bond strength of current resin-matrix ceramics
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of silane and universal adhesive applications on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different resin-matrix ceramics (RMCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 120 slides (14 × 12 × 1 mm) were produced from 5 different RMC materials (GC Cerasmart [GC]; Brilliant Crios [BC]; Grandio blocs [GB]; Katana Avencia [KA]; and KZR-CAD HR 2 [KZR]) and sandblasted using 50 μm Al2O3 particles. Each RMC material was divided into six groups according to the surface conditioning (SC) method as follows: control (G1), silane primer (G2), silane-free universal adhesive (G3), silane-containing universal adhesive (G4), silane primer and silanefree universal adhesive (G5), and silane primer and silane-containing universal adhesive (G6). Three cylindric specimens made from resin cement (Bifix QM) were polymerized over the treated surface of each slide (n = 12). After thermal cycling (10000 cycles, 5 - 55°C), μSBS test was performed and failure types were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = .05). RESULTS. μSBS values of specimens were significantly affected by the RMC type and SC protocols (P < .001) except the interaction (P = .119). Except for G2, all SC protocols showed a significant increase in μSBS values (P < .05). For all RMCs, the highest μSBS values were obtained in G4 and G6 groups. CONCLUSION. Only silane application did not affect the μSBS values regardless of the RMC type. Moreover, the application of a separate silane in addition to the universal adhesives did not improve the μSBS values. Silanecontaining universal adhesive was found to be the best conditioning method for RMCs.
Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of silane and universal adhesive applications on the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS) of different resin-matrix ceramics (RMCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 120 slides (14 × 12 × 1 mm) were produced from 5 different RMC materials (GC Cerasmart [GC]; Brilliant Crios [BC]; Grandio blocs [GB]; Katana Avencia [KA]; and KZR-CAD HR 2 [KZR]) and sandblasted using 50 μm Al2O3 particles. Each RMC material was divided into six groups according to the surface conditioning (SC) method as follows: control (G1), silane primer (G2), silane-free universal adhesive (G3), silane-containing universal adhesive (G4), silane primer and silanefree universal adhesive (G5), and silane primer and silane-containing universal adhesive (G6). Three cylindric specimens made from resin cement (Bifix QM) were polymerized over the treated surface of each slide (n = 12). After thermal cycling (10000 cycles, 5 - 55°C), μSBS test was performed and failure types were evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (α = .05). RESULTS. μSBS values of specimens were significantly affected by the RMC type and SC protocols (P < .001) except the interaction (P = .119). Except for G2, all SC protocols showed a significant increase in μSBS values (P < .05). For all RMCs, the highest μSBS values were obtained in G4 and G6 groups. CONCLUSION. Only silane application did not affect the μSBS values regardless of the RMC type. Moreover, the application of a separate silane in addition to the universal adhesives did not improve the μSBS values. Silanecontaining universal adhesive was found to be the best conditioning method for RMCs.
참고문헌 (59)
- Gunal B, "Optical properties of contemporary monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials at different thicknesses", J Esthet Restor Dent, 30, pp.434~441 (2018)
- Li RW, "Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD", CAM technology : state of the art, 2014, pp.58, 208~216
- Blatz MB, "The current state of chairside digital dentistry and materials", Dent Clin North Am, 63, pp.175~197 (2019)
- Lucsanszky IJR, "Fracture toughness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus of new CAD", CAM resin composite blocks, 2020, pp.29, 34~41
- Barutcigil K, "Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD", CAM restorative material, 2019, pp.28, 71~78
- Jorquera G, "Hybrid ceramics in dentistry : a literature review", J Clin Res Dent, 1, pp.1~5 (2018)
- Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, "The effect of surface treatments on the mechanical and optical behaviors of CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2019, pp.28, e496~e503
- Nguyen JF, "Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization", Dent Mater, 28, pp.529~534 (2012)
- Awada A, "Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD", CAM restorative materials, 2015, pp.114, 587~593
- Gracis S, "A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials", Int J Prosthodont, 28, pp.227~235 (2015)
- Günal Abduljalil B, "How will surface conditioning methods influence the translucency and color properties of CAD-CAM resin-matrix ceramics with different thicknesses", J Esthet Restor Dent, 33, pp.925~934 (2021)
- Mainjot A, "Recent advances in composite CAD", CAM blocks, 2016, pp.11, 275~280
- Awad MM, "Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic", BMC Oral Health, 19, pp.1~7 (2019)
- Cengiz-Yanardag E, "Effect of different surface treatment methods on micro-shear bond strength of CAD-CAM restorative materials to resin cement", J Adhes Sci Technol, 33, pp.110~123 (2018)
- Harorli OT, "Shear bond strength of a self-etched resin cement to an indirect composite : effect of different surface treatments", Niger J Clin Pract, 18, pp.405~410 (2015)
- Soares CJ, "Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations : a literature review", J Esthet Restor Dent, 17, pp.224~235 (2005)
- Spitznagel FA, "Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic", polymer materials : a review of the literature, 2014, pp.26, 382~393
- Emsermann I, "Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CADCAM blocks", J Adhes Dent, 21, pp.433~443 (2019)
- Reymus M, "Bonding to new CAD", CAM resin composites : influence of air abrasion and conditioning agents as pretreatment strategy, 2019, pp.23, 529~538
- Tekçe N, "Microtensile bond strength of CAD", CAM resin blocks to dual-cure adhesive cement : the effect of different sandblasting procedures, 2019, pp.28, e485~e490
- Wu X, "Effect of tribochemical silica coating or multipurpose products on bonding performance of a CAD", CAM resin-based material, 2019, pp.90, 417~425
- Elsaka SE, "Bond strength of novel CAD", CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement : the effect of surface treatments, 2014, pp.16, 531~540
- Demirtag Z, "Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement", Oper Dent, 44, pp.156~167 (2019)
- Yano HT, "Correlation between microstructure of CAD", CAM composites and the silanization effect on adhesive bonding, 2020, pp.101, 103441~
- Çelik E, "Shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite to the resin matrix ceramics after different surface treatments", Photomed Laser Surg, 36, pp.424~430 (2018)
- Elsaka SE, "Bond strength of novel CAD", CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement : the effect of surface treatments, 2014, pp.16, 531~540
- Filho AM, "Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength", J Prosthodont, 13, pp.28~35 (2004)
- Ozcan M, "Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.725~731 (2003)
- Atsu SS, "Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin", J Prosthet Dent, 95, pp.430~436 (2006)
- Colares RC, "Effect of surface pretreatments on the microtensile bond strength of lithium-disilicate ceramic repaired with composite resin", Braz Dent J, 24, pp.349~352 (2013)
- Corazza PH, "Effect of post-silanization heat treatments of silanized feldspathic ceramic on adhesion to resin cement", J Adhes Dent, 15, pp.473~479 (2013)
- Shinohara A, "Effects of tributylborane-activated adhesive and two silane agents on bonding computer-aided design and manufacturing(CAD", CAM)resin composite, 2017, pp.105, 437~442
- Blatz MB, "Resin-ceramic bonding : a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.268~274 (2003)
- Yoshihara K, "Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives", Dent Mater, 32, pp.1218~1225 (2016)
- Yao C, "Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives", Dent Mater, 34, pp.809~818 (2018)
- Söderholm KJ, "Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica", J Dent Res, 72, pp.1050~1054 (1993)
- Queiroz JR, "Surface characterization of feldspathic ceramic using ATR FT-IR and ellipsometry after various silanization protocols", Dent Mater, 28, pp.189~196 (2012)
- Yao C, "Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics, 2017, pp.125, 173~180
- Muñoz MA, "The effect of the loading method and cross-head speed on resin-denhttps tin microshear bond strength", Int J Adhes Adhes, 50, pp.136~141 (2014)
- Yoshihara K, "Sandblasting may damage the surface of composite CAD-CAM blocks", Dent Mater, 33, pp.e124~e135 (2017)
- Yang B, "Influence of contamination on zirconia ceramic bonding", J Dent Res, 86, pp.749~753 (2007)
- Çelik E, "Shear bond strength of nanohybrid composite to the resin matrix ceramics after different surface treatments", Photomed Laser Surg, 36, pp.424~430 (2018)
- Rohr N, "Efficacy of a universal adhesive in the bond strength of composite cements to polymer-infiltrated ceramic", J Adhes Dent, 19, pp.417~424 (2017)
- Matinlinna JP, "Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments : a review", Dent Mater, 34, pp.13~28 (2018)
- Cura M, "Effect of surface treatment and aging on bond strength of composite resin onlays", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.389~396 (2016)
- Gilbert S, "Bonding between CAD", CAM resin and resin composite cements dependent on bonding agents : three different in vitro test methods, 2016, pp.20, 227~236
- Shinohara A, "Effects of three silane primers and five adhesive agents on the bond strength of composite material for a computer-aided design and manufacturing system", J Appl Oral Sci, 26, pp.e20170342~ (2018)
- Miyazaki M, "Important compositional characteristics in the clinical use of adhesive systems", J Oral Sci, 56, pp.1~9 (2014)
- Chen Y, "Effect of 10-methacryloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate concentration on chemical coupling of methacrylate resin to yttria-stabilized zirconia", J Adhes Dent, 19, pp.349~355 (2017)
- Eldafrawy M, "Bonding to CAD-CAM composites : an interfacial fracture toughness approach", J Dent Res, 97, pp.60~67 (2018)
- Frankenberger R, "Adhesive luting of new CAD", CAM materials, 2015, pp.18, 9~20
- Ruse ND, "Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD", CAM applications, 2014, pp.93, 1232~1234
- Chen MH, "Update on dental nanocomposites", J Dent Res, 89, pp.549~560 (2010)
- Hibino Y, "Effect of storage conditions on mechanical properties of resin composite blanks for CAD", CAM crowns, 2020, pp.39, 742~751
- Ferracane JL, "In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler", matrix coupling, 1998, pp.42, 465~472
- Placido E, "Shear versus micro-shear bond strength test : a finite element stress analysis", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1086~1092 (2007)
- Andrade AM, "Do the microshear test variables affect the bond strength values?", Int J Dent, 2012, pp.618960~ (2012)
- Armstrong S, "Adhesion to tooth structure : a critical review of"micro"bond strength test methods", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e50~e62 (2010)
- Scherrer SS, "Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods : a critical literature review", Dent Mater, 26, pp.e78~e93 (2010)