본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역된 문화텍스트의 정보성 등가와 로마자 표기방식의 문제점

Informative equivalence and appropriateness of the existing romanization practices in translations of cultural texts

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

The purposes of the paper are (1) to evaluate translations of cultural texts that are already assigned and accepted by the public sector of Korea, using as a quality evaluation criterion the informative equivalence between the source and its translated text pairs, and subsequently (2) to question the validity/appropriateness of the existing Romanization practices prevalent in Korea in translating cultural texts. In order to do so, translations that have been both commissioned and accepted by 12 public sector organizations of Korea, including the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Seoul Metropolitan City, and the Korean Administration of Cultural Heritage, are collected and analyzed. As for the organization of the present paper, after a brief introduction, the second part constitutes a theoretical review of the significance of informative equivalence as a criterion with which to evaluate translation quality. The third part discusses the research design and findings in detail. By way of conclusion, the fourth part questions the appropriateness of the prevalent Romanization practices as a way of transferring the informative contents of culturemes, and a suggestion for a new Romanization convention is made.

Abstract

The purposes of the paper are (1) to evaluate translations of cultural texts that are already assigned and accepted by the public sector of Korea, using as a quality evaluation criterion the informative equivalence between the source and its translated text pairs, and subsequently (2) to question the validity/appropriateness of the existing Romanization practices prevalent in Korea in translating cultural texts. In order to do so, translations that have been both commissioned and accepted by 12 public sector organizations of Korea, including the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Seoul Metropolitan City, and the Korean Administration of Cultural Heritage, are collected and analyzed. As for the organization of the present paper, after a brief introduction, the second part constitutes a theoretical review of the significance of informative equivalence as a criterion with which to evaluate translation quality. The third part discusses the research design and findings in detail. By way of conclusion, the fourth part questions the appropriateness of the prevalent Romanization practices as a way of transferring the informative contents of culturemes, and a suggestion for a new Romanization convention is made.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 정호정, "동일한 언어로 말하기 -번역학 연구를 위한 용어통일의 시급성-", 국제회의통역과번역, 9(1), pp.173~203 (2007), 한국통역번역학회
  2. 정호정, "국가번역시스템 구축을 위한 기초연구" (2007), 한국문학번역원
  3. Baker,M., "In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation" (1992), Routledge
  4. Chesterman,A., "Memes of Translation" (1997), John Benjamins
  5. Even-Zohar,I., "Decisions in Translating Poetry", Ha-sifrut, 1975, pp.21, 32~45
  6. Fillmore,C., "An alternative to checklist theories of meaning", BLS, 1, pp.123~131 (1975)
  7. Fillmore,C., "Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.111~138 (1982), Hanshin
  8. Fillmore,C., "Frames and the semantics of understanding", Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), pp.222~253 (1985)
  9. Fillmore,C, "Corpus linguistics’ vs. ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. Directions in corpus linguistics, 35-60. Mouton de Gruyter (Proceedings from a 1992 Nobel Symposium on Corpus Linguistics, Stockholm)", ~ (1992)
  10. Fillmore, C., "Towards a frame-based lexicon: the case of RISK. In Frames and fields" (1992), Erlbaum Publishers
  11. Gray, W. S., "What makes a book readable" (1935), Chicago University Press
  12. Grice,H.P., "Logic and conversation" (1975), Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Gutt,E-A, "Translation and relevance: Cognition and context" (1991), Blackwell
  14. Gutt,E-A, "Relevance theory: A guide to successful communication in translation" (1992), United Bible Societies
  15. Gutt,E-A, "Implicit information in literary translation: A relevance- theoretic perspective", Target, 8(2), pp.239~256 (1996)
  16. Gutt, E-A, "Pragmatic aspects of translation: Some relevance theory observations. In The pragmatics of translation" (1998), Multilingual Matters
  17. Hatim, B., "The Translator as Communicator" (1987), Routledge
  18. Holz-M?tt?i,J., "Translatorisches Handeln. Theorie und Methode" (1984), Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia
  19. Kussmaul,P., "Training the Translator" (1995), John Benjamins
  20. Lederer, M., "The interpretive theory of translation: A brief survey", Conference Interpretation and Translation, 1, pp.15~28 (1999)
  21. Lederer,M., "The role of cognitive complements in interpreting. Interpreting: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, 34-45", ~ (2000)
  22. Mason,I., "Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting" (2001), St. Jerome
  23. Nida, E., "The theory and practice of translation" (1969), E.J. Brill
  24. Nord,C., "Translating as a purposeful activity: Functionalist approaches explained" (1997), St. Jerome
  25. Pöchhacker, F., "Simultaneous Interpreting: A Functional Perspective", Journal of Linguistics, 14, pp.31~53
  26. Lebende Sprachen, 22(3): 97-100. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in Translation, 105-115. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab, , 1977
  27. Reiβ, K., "Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie" (1984), Niemeyer
  28. Seleskovitch, D., "Interpreting for international conferences: Problems of language and communication. Paris: Didier-Eruditio. (정호정 옮김(2002), ??국제회의통역에의 초대??, 서울: 한국문화사)", ~ (2002)
  29. Seleskovitch, D., "Context-free language and sense in translation. In Perspectives on Langauge in Performance" (1987), Gunter Narr Verlag
  30. Sperber, D., "Relevance: Communication and cognition" (1986), Blackwell
  31. Tannen, D., "Framing in discourse" (1993), Oxford Univ. Press
  32. Tannen,D., "What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations In Framing in discourse", pp.14~56 (1993), Oxford Univ. Press
  33. Tannen,D., "The pragmatics of cross-cultural communication", Applied linguistics, 5(3), pp.189~195 (1994)
  34. Toury,G., "Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
  35. Vermeer,H., "Ein Rahmen f? eine allgemeine Translationstheorie", Lebende Sprachen, 23(1), pp.99~102 (1978)
  36. Vermeer,H., "Translation theory and linguistics", pp.1~10 (1983), turkimuksesta
  37. Vermeer,H., "What does it mean to translate?", Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), pp.25~33 (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)