번역철학 - 그 계보학적 탐구
The philosophy of translation - its genealogical research
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the philosophy of translation, “language” means a natural language, and it deals with relations between at least two natural languages. At the heart of Plato’s philosophy of translation posited by Antoine Berman is that the formal aspect of language can be separated from the meaningful(i.e. conceptual/ideal) aspect. The metaphysical divisibility of language places Plate into the category of sense-oriented translation theorists. Insisting on the unity of the author’s thought and expression, Friedrich Schleiermacher cites the level of the author’s intervention as the dividing factor between translation and interpretation. He can be justifiably called the founder of the literal translation theory. While Walter Benjamin is known as the most difficult theorist, he mounts the most profound refutation and resistance to the subordinate and marginal status of translation. Known to have laid the groundwork for linguistics-based translation studies in France, Georges Mounin maintains that translation should be transparent(or unobtrusive) so that the reader doesn’t feel any involvement of the translator. Therefore he can be considered a sense-oriented translation theorist. As a theorist armed with practical experience, Berman has built his own realm in the field of Translation Studies and is regarded as the most serious thinker of translation, going beyond the sense-oriented translation to propose what he terms ‘translation-to-the-letter.’ While acknowledging his indebtedness to Berman and Deleuze, Lawrence Venuti takes the position of challenging and resisting the mainstream and standard tendency of the target language, and advocates foreignizing translation, following the footsteps of Schleiermacher, Benjamin and Berman.
Abstract
In the philosophy of translation, “language” means a natural language, and it deals with relations between at least two natural languages. At the heart of Plato’s philosophy of translation posited by Antoine Berman is that the formal aspect of language can be separated from the meaningful(i.e. conceptual/ideal) aspect. The metaphysical divisibility of language places Plate into the category of sense-oriented translation theorists. Insisting on the unity of the author’s thought and expression, Friedrich Schleiermacher cites the level of the author’s intervention as the dividing factor between translation and interpretation. He can be justifiably called the founder of the literal translation theory. While Walter Benjamin is known as the most difficult theorist, he mounts the most profound refutation and resistance to the subordinate and marginal status of translation. Known to have laid the groundwork for linguistics-based translation studies in France, Georges Mounin maintains that translation should be transparent(or unobtrusive) so that the reader doesn’t feel any involvement of the translator. Therefore he can be considered a sense-oriented translation theorist. As a theorist armed with practical experience, Berman has built his own realm in the field of Translation Studies and is regarded as the most serious thinker of translation, going beyond the sense-oriented translation to propose what he terms ‘translation-to-the-letter.’ While acknowledging his indebtedness to Berman and Deleuze, Lawrence Venuti takes the position of challenging and resisting the mainstream and standard tendency of the target language, and advocates foreignizing translation, following the footsteps of Schleiermacher, Benjamin and Berman.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김영옥, "벤야민의 경험이론 - 언어철학과 역사철학이 만나는 곳", 현대비평과 이론, pp.156~178 (1994)
- 김재인, "천 개의 고원." (2001), 새물결출판사
- 들뢰즈, "차이와 반복" (2005), 민음사
- 윤성우, "번역론" (2006), 철학과현실사
- 먼데이, J., "번역학 입문 - 이론과 적용" (2006), 한국외국어대학교 출판부
- 무냉, G., "번역의 이론적 문제점" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
- 베누티, L., "번역윤리 - 차이의 미학을 위하여" (2006), 열린책들
- 베르만, A., "선 것으로부터 오는 시련 - 독일 낭만주의 문화와 번역" (2009), 철학과 현실사
- 베르만, A., "번역과 문자" (2011), 철학과현실사
- 발터 벤야민, "발터 벤야민의 文藝理論", pp.315~333 (1983), 민음사
- 볼츠, N., "발터 벤야민 - 예술 종교 역사철학" (2000), 서광사
- 이창남, "발터 벤야민의 언어이론적 인식론과 독서개념", 독일문학, 45(4), pp.232~252 (2004), 한국독어독문학회
- 최성만, "언어 번역 미메시스 - 벤야민의 언어 철학과 유사성론 고찰", 문예미학, 2, pp.289~320 (1996)
- 최신한, "이해의 한계와 번역불가능성의 문제", 해석학연구, (19), pp.29~56 (2007), 한국해석학회
- 팔머, R. E., "해석학이란 무엇인가?" (1990), 문예출판사
- 플라톤, "크라튈로스" (2007), 이제이북스
- Schulte, R., "번역이론 - 드라이든에서 데리다까지의 논선" (2008), 동인
- Berman, A., "L'essence platonicienne de la traduction", Revue d'esthétique, 12, pp.63~73 (1986)
- Hegel, G. W. F., "Hegel’s Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, Vol. II" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Koutsivitis, V., "Pour une the´orie de la essence de la traduction", Meta, 38(3), pp.468~472 (1993)
- Ladmiral, J. -R., "Sourciers et ciblistes", Revue d'e´sthe´tique, (12), pp.33~42 (1986)
- Ladmiral, J.-R., "A partir de George Mounin: esquisse arche´ ologique", TTR, 8(1), pp.35~64 (1995)
- Mounin, G., "Les belles infideˋ les" (1994), Presse Universitaires de Lilles
- Mounin, G., "Linguistique et philosophie" (1975), PUF
- Mounin, G., "Linguistique et traduction" (1976), Dessart et Mardaga
- Nida, E. A., "Theories of Translation", TTR, 4(1), pp.19~32 (1991)
- Schleiermacher, F., "Des différentes méthodes de traduire" (1999), Seuil
- Steiner, G., "Après Babel - une poétique du dire et de la traduction" (1998), Albin Michel
- Venuti, L., "The Translation Studies Reader" (2000), Rouledge
