언어, 번역 그리고 정체성 −베르만(Berman), 베누티(Venuti) 그리고 들뢰즈(Deleuze)의 번역론을 중심으로
Language, Translation and Identity
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Inspired by my own experience of reading and translating a book written by a French translator, Antoine Berman, I am going to suggest my problematics in this paper as follows: (1) Translation is the threshold from which changes of a language begin and a window where the results of such changes show. (2) Therefore, translation provides a vital clue to the issue of nature or identity of a language. (3) After all, the matter of translation is that of language exceeding a level of communication and, at the same time, that of world views or thinking. In the main body, I argue that the issue of identity in language can be divided into two sides in tension; one that regards a language as a fixed invariable and the other that considers a language as a variable or moving. The former is mostly backed by paraphrasers, while the latter is supported by literalists. The former believes that a mother tongue is "untouchable" and communication is the core of a language and translation. The latter reckons that the nature of translation is pursuing changes and expansion of a mother tongue by introducing "the foreign". In this respect, Lawrence Venuti's approach of "foreignazation" and Gilles Deleuze's strategy of "minor language" are definitely worth noting. In conclusion, I agree on Berman's insight that "the nature of translation is opening, dialogue, hybrid and decenterment" and claim that Venuti pursues hybrid, while Deleuze seeks decenterment. As Luther emphasized a strong encounter with the foreign when he translated the bible in German, I insist that a close relation with the foreign texts is required for Korean to take shape.
Abstract
Inspired by my own experience of reading and translating a book written by a French translator, Antoine Berman, I am going to suggest my problematics in this paper as follows: (1) Translation is the threshold from which changes of a language begin and a window where the results of such changes show. (2) Therefore, translation provides a vital clue to the issue of nature or identity of a language. (3) After all, the matter of translation is that of language exceeding a level of communication and, at the same time, that of world views or thinking. In the main body, I argue that the issue of identity in language can be divided into two sides in tension; one that regards a language as a fixed invariable and the other that considers a language as a variable or moving. The former is mostly backed by paraphrasers, while the latter is supported by literalists. The former believes that a mother tongue is "untouchable" and communication is the core of a language and translation. The latter reckons that the nature of translation is pursuing changes and expansion of a mother tongue by introducing "the foreign". In this respect, Lawrence Venuti's approach of "foreignazation" and Gilles Deleuze's strategy of "minor language" are definitely worth noting. In conclusion, I agree on Berman's insight that "the nature of translation is opening, dialogue, hybrid and decenterment" and claim that Venuti pursues hybrid, while Deleuze seeks decenterment. As Luther emphasized a strong encounter with the foreign when he translated the bible in German, I insist that a close relation with the foreign texts is required for Korean to take shape.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김건환, "현대 독일어 형성과 마르틴 루터의 역할", 인문과학논, (27), pp.33~51 (1995)
- 김선희, "복제인격과 인격의 문제", 철학연구, 49, pp.253~272 (2000)
- 배주옥, "전복의 힘으로서의 번역-한글번역과 개화기 접경지역의 탈영토화를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 9(3), pp.47~71 (2008), 한국번역학회
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈의 문학론은 일관성을 가지고 있는가? －프루스트론과 카프카론을 중심으로－", 철학과 현상학 연구, (38), pp.101~124 (2008), 한국현상학회
- 윤동구, "비재현적 번역 이론의 가능성: 들뢰즈(G. Deleuze)의 이론을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2003
- 윤성우, "재현의 문제와 들뢰즈, 그리고 다른 철학자들" (2004), 철학과 현실사
- 윤성우, "폴 리쾨르의 철학" (2004), 철학과현실사
- 윤성우, "발터 벤야민(W. Benjamin)의 번역론에 관한 소고", 번역학연구, 8(1), pp.175~192 (2007), 한국번역학회
- 윤성우, "조르쥬 무냉(George Mounin) 번역론의 몇 가지 철학적 전제들에 관한 소고", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.103~120 (2009), 한국번역학회
- 이기상, "철학노트" (2002), 까치
- 정선태, "근대계몽기의 번역론과 번역 사상. in: 근대어·근대매체·근대문학: 근대 매체와 근대 언어질서의 상관성", pp.43~66 (2006), 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원
- 정혜용, "베르만과 메쇼닉의 번역이론 이해를 위하여- 속담번역의 상징적 위치", 불어불문학연구, (66), pp.239~256 (2006), 한국불어불문학회
- 조재룡, "메쇼닉(H. Meschonnic)에 있어서 ‘리듬’의 개념ㅡ 『리듬비평Critique du rythme』을 중심으로", 불어불문학연구, (54), pp.630~661 (2003), 한국불어불문학회
- 탁석산, "한국의 정체성" (2001), 책세상
- Benjamin, W, "발터 벤야민의 문예이론" (1983), 민음사
- 번역자의 과제 외, "언어일반과 인간 언어에 대하여", pp.2008, Benjamin, W
- Berman, A, "낯선 것으로부터 오는 시련: 독일 낭만주의 문화와 번역" (2009), 철학과현실사
- Berman, A, "La traduction et la langue française", Meta, 30(4) (1985)
- Berman, A, "L'essence platonienne de la traduction", Revue d'ésthetique, 12 (1986)
- Berman, A, "La traduction et la lettre ou l'auberge du loiltain" (1999), Seuil
- Deleuze, G, "차이와 반복" (2005), 민음사
- Deleuze, G, "Critique et clinique" (1993), Editions de Minuit
- Deleuze, G, "카프카: 소수적인 문학을 위하여" (2001), 동문선
- Deleuze, G, "천 개의 고원: 자본주의와 분열증2" (2001), 새물결
- Edwards, P, "The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4" (1972), Macmillan
- Luther, "Oeuvres, t. VI" (1964), Labor et Fides
- Mounin, G, "Les problèmes théorique de la traduction" (1963), Gallimard
- Mounin, G, "번역의 이론적 문제점" (2002), 고려대학교출판부
- Mounin, G, "Les belles infidèles" (1994), Presse Universitaires de Lilles
- Venuti, L, "The Scandals of Translation-Towards an ethics of difference" (1998), Routledge
- Venuti, L, "번역윤리: 차이의 미학을 위하여" (2006), 열린책들