Quantitative measurement of peri-implant bone defects using optical coherence tomography
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to visualize and identify peri-implant bone defects in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to obtain quantitative measurements of the defect depth. Methods: Dehiscence defects were intentionally formed in porcine mandibles and implants were simultaneously placed without flap elevation. Only the threads of the fixture could be seen at the bone defect site in the OCT images, so the depth of the peri-implant bone defect could be measured through the length of the visible threads. To analyze the reliability of the OCT measurements, the flaps were elevated and the depth of the dehiscence defects was measured with a digital caliper. Results: The average defect depth measured by a digital caliper was 4.88±1.28 mm, and the corresponding OCT measurement was 5.11±1.33 mm. Very thin bone areas that were sufficiently transparent in the coronal portion were penetrated by the optical beam in OCT imaging and regarded as bone loss. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was high, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) close to 1. In the Bland-Altman analysis, most measured values were within the threshold of the 95% CI, suggesting close agreement of the OCT measurements with the caliper measurements. Conclusions: OCT images can be used to visualize the peri-implant bone level and to identify bone defects. The potential of quantitative non-invasive measurements of the amount of bone loss was also confirmed.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to visualize and identify peri-implant bone defects in optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and to obtain quantitative measurements of the defect depth. Methods: Dehiscence defects were intentionally formed in porcine mandibles and implants were simultaneously placed without flap elevation. Only the threads of the fixture could be seen at the bone defect site in the OCT images, so the depth of the peri-implant bone defect could be measured through the length of the visible threads. To analyze the reliability of the OCT measurements, the flaps were elevated and the depth of the dehiscence defects was measured with a digital caliper. Results: The average defect depth measured by a digital caliper was 4.88±1.28 mm, and the corresponding OCT measurement was 5.11±1.33 mm. Very thin bone areas that were sufficiently transparent in the coronal portion were penetrated by the optical beam in OCT imaging and regarded as bone loss. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the 2 methods was high, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) close to 1. In the Bland-Altman analysis, most measured values were within the threshold of the 95% CI, suggesting close agreement of the OCT measurements with the caliper measurements. Conclusions: OCT images can be used to visualize the peri-implant bone level and to identify bone defects. The potential of quantitative non-invasive measurements of the amount of bone loss was also confirmed.
참고문헌 (22)
- De Bruyn H, "Radiographic evaluation of modern oral implants with emphasis on crestal bone level and relevance to peri-implant health", Periodontol 2000, 62, pp.256~270 (2013)[DOI]
- Christiaens V, "Assessment of periodontal bone level revisited: a controlled study on the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation methods and intra-oral radiography", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.425~431 (2018)[DOI]
- Christiaens V, "Intraoral radiography lacks accuracy for the assessment of peri-implant bone level - a controlled clinical study", Eur J Oral Implantology, 10, pp.435~441 (2017)
- Garcia-Garcia M, "Accuracy of periapical radiography in assessing bone level in implants affected by peri-implantitis: a cross-sectional study", J Clin Periodontol, 43, pp.85~91 (2016)[DOI]
- Bohner LOL, "Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 124, pp.432~440 (2017)[DOI]
- Agrawal P, "New developments in tools for periodontal diagnosis", Int Dent J, 62, pp.57~64 (2012)[DOI]
- Mota CC, "Non-invasive periodontal probing through fourierdomain optical coherence tomography", J Periodontol, 86, pp.1087~1094 (2015)[DOI]
- Colston BW Jr, "Imaging of hard- and soft-tissue structure in the oral cavity by optical coherence tomography", Appl Opt, 37, pp.3582~3585 (1998)[DOI]
- Fernandes LO, "In vivo assessment of periodontal structures and measurement of gingival sulcus with Optical Coherence Tomography: a pilot study", J Biophotonics, 10, pp.862~869 (2017)[DOI]
- Hsieh YS, "Subgingival calculus imaging based on swept-source optical coherence tomography", J Biomed Opt, 16, pp.071409~ (2011)[DOI]
- 박진영, "Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracies of optical coherence tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histology in periodontal disease: an ex vivo study", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 47(1), pp.30~40 (2017), 대한치주과학회
- 김설희, "Improved accuracy in periodontal pocket depth measurement using optical coherence tomography", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 47(1), pp.13~19 (2017), 대한치주과학회
- Altman DG, "Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies", Statistician, 32, pp.307~317 (1983)[DOI]
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)[DOI]
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Lindhe J, "Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.9~16 (1992)[DOI]
- Heitz-Mayfield LJ, "Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. periimplantitis", Periodontol 2000, 53, pp.167~181 (2010)[DOI]
- Serino G, "Probing at implants with peri-implantitis and its relation to clinical periimplant bone loss", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.91~95 (2013)[DOI]
- Ringeling J, "Discomfort", pain due to pocket probing at teeth and endosseous implants: a cross-sectional study, 2016, pp.27, 1005~1009
- Benn DK, "A review of the reliability of radiographic measurements in estimating alveolar bone changes", J Clin Periodontol, 17, pp.14~21 (1990)[DOI]
- Coli P, "Reliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring periimplant health and disease", Periodontol 2000, 73, pp.203~217 (2017)[DOI]
- Tomasi C, "Clinical research of peri-implant diseases--quality of reporting, case definitions and methods to study incidence, prevalence and risk factors of peri-implant diseases", J Clin Periodontol, 39(Suppl 12), pp.207~223 (2012)[DOI]