한-영 신문사설 번역에서 나타나는 인간번역과 기계번역 간의 어휘 사용 차이 연구
A study of lexical usage differences between human and machine translation in English translations of Korean newspaper editorials
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to identify stylistic differences between human and machine translation in terms of word usage. For this purpose, a comparable corpus was constructed, which consisted of English translations of 110 Korean newspaper editorials done by a group of human translators and three online machine translation services (Google, Bing and Papago) respectively. Principal component analysis was performed on the corpus to investigate differences in the way 200 most frequent terms are related to the human and machine translators. Additionally, part-of-speech analyses were carried out to further elucidate the differences found in the PCA analysis. The major findings are that machine translators tend to overuse ‘be’ verbs and ‘as’ and ‘if’ subjunctive connectives, while underusing third-person personal pronouns, particularly the female form, ‘she’. Additionally, they were found to rely heavily on high-frequency content words. These characteristics of machine translators are construed as stemming from their scope of lexical options being limited by structural correspondence to original Korean texts.
Abstract
This study aims to identify stylistic differences between human and machine translation in terms of word usage. For this purpose, a comparable corpus was constructed, which consisted of English translations of 110 Korean newspaper editorials done by a group of human translators and three online machine translation services (Google, Bing and Papago) respectively. Principal component analysis was performed on the corpus to investigate differences in the way 200 most frequent terms are related to the human and machine translators. Additionally, part-of-speech analyses were carried out to further elucidate the differences found in the PCA analysis. The major findings are that machine translators tend to overuse ‘be’ verbs and ‘as’ and ‘if’ subjunctive connectives, while underusing third-person personal pronouns, particularly the female form, ‘she’. Additionally, they were found to rely heavily on high-frequency content words. These characteristics of machine translators are construed as stemming from their scope of lexical options being limited by structural correspondence to original Korean texts.
참고문헌 (21)
- 마승혜, "문학작품 기계번역의 한계에 대한 상세 고찰", 통번역학연구, 22(3), pp.65~88 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 서보현, "기계번역 결과물의 오류유형 고찰", 번역학연구, 19(1), pp.99~117 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이상빈, "국내학부 번역전공자의 구글 기계번역 포스트에디팅 과정(process) 및 행위 연구", 번역학연구, 19(3), pp.259~286 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이성화, "영-한 및 한-영 기계번역 품질향상을 위한프리에디팅 기법 제안", 번역학연구, 19(5), pp.121~154 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이준호, "문학번역 적용을 위한 기계번역의 현주소", 통번역학연구, 23(1), pp.143~167 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이창수, "문학번역에서의 기계번역과 인간번역 문체에 대한 전산문체학적 비교 연구", 번역학연구, 20(2), pp.111~130 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 임형재, "한국어 번역을 위한 문화소의 기계번역 연구-중국 외교연설문 번역의 정확도 평가를 중심으로-", 현대사회와 다문화, 8(2), pp.68~94 (2018), 다문화사회정책연구소[DOI]
- 최효은, "특허 기계번역 결과물의 평가 - KIPRIS의 무료 한영 기계번역을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 19(1), pp.139~178 (2017), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 진용주, "프리에디팅(pre-editing)이 기계번역 품질에 미치는 영향 고찰: 유창성, 충실성, 가독성 비교를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 22(3), pp.27~64 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 한승희, "기계번역·인간번역·트랜스크리에이션의 문체 비교: 광고 번역을 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 21(2), pp.163~188 (2017), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 한현희, "한노 기계번역의 오류 유형화 및 품질 개선을 위한 프리에디팅(pre-editing) 규칙 제안", 통번역학연구, 23(3), pp.291~327 (2019), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- Baker, M, "Terminology, LSP and Translation, Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Iuan C", pp.175~186 (1996), John Benjamins
- Castilho, S., "Translation Quality, Assessment from Principles to Practice", pp.9~38 (2018), Springer
- "2018", ~
- Juola, P., "Authorship attribution", Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1(3), pp.233~334 (2006)
- Laviosa, S., "Translation Translation", pp.153~162 (2003), Rodopi
- "2018", ~
- Liu, F., "Machine Translation", pp.39~51 (2019), Springer
- Toury, G., "Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
- Wehrli, E., "Anaphora resolution, Collocations and translation", Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-word Units in Machine Translation and Translation Technology, pp.12~17 (2013)
- "2016", ~