한중 순차통역에서 나타난 수사적 방법에 대한 고찰
A study on the rhetorical methods in Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since diplomatic relations between Korea and China normalized in 1992, there has been an overwhelming increase in the number of interpreters and translators that connect speakers of the two countries. However, during the Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation process, it is common to encounter literal expressions that reproduce the syntactic structure of Korean as it is or awkward expressions that impede the comprehension of the listener. However, there are not many studies that focus on this issue. This study recognized this problem and analyzed errors based on 560 texts from 40 graduates of the Graduate School of Interpretation and Translation in order to provide practical data to the Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation education field. In order to examine the types of rhetorical errors that appear in the results of learners of Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation, errors were classified into word rhetoric, phrase rhetoric, sentence rhetoric, and text rhetoric according to the rhetoric structure. The appropriateness of active phonology was considered as well. This paper aims to provide practical and educational material that can be used in the field of consecutive interpretation education from Korean to Chinese.
Abstract
Since diplomatic relations between Korea and China normalized in 1992, there has been an overwhelming increase in the number of interpreters and translators that connect speakers of the two countries. However, during the Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation process, it is common to encounter literal expressions that reproduce the syntactic structure of Korean as it is or awkward expressions that impede the comprehension of the listener. However, there are not many studies that focus on this issue. This study recognized this problem and analyzed errors based on 560 texts from 40 graduates of the Graduate School of Interpretation and Translation in order to provide practical data to the Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation education field. In order to examine the types of rhetorical errors that appear in the results of learners of Korean-Chinese consecutive interpretation, errors were classified into word rhetoric, phrase rhetoric, sentence rhetoric, and text rhetoric according to the rhetoric structure. The appropriateness of active phonology was considered as well. This paper aims to provide practical and educational material that can be used in the field of consecutive interpretation education from Korean to Chinese.
참고문헌 (11)
- 남성우, "통번역의 이해와 수행" (2006), 한국문화사
- 야오캉, "한중 순차통역 평가 기준 연구 : 도착어 텍스트 내적 차원을중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- 耿智, "逻辑推理与科技翻译", 中国科技翻译, 23(2), pp.9~10 (2010)
- 戴永红, "论写作中语体色彩词语选择的方法", 零陵学院学报, 2(3), pp.89~90 (2004)
- 刘宓庆, "文体与翻译" (1998), 中国对外翻译出版有限公司
- 李庆荣, "现代实用汉语修辞" (2010), 北京大学出版社
- 穆凤良, "逻辑比较与英汉翻译" (2009), 国防工业出版社
- 白俊耀, "句义论", 河北师范大学学报, 9(1), pp.44~49 (1986)
- 吴洁敏, "论汉语节奏规律", 广播电视大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, (01), pp.62~66 (1998)
- 朱庆, "从思维方式看英汉句法差异与翻译", 齐齐哈尔大学学报, pp.116~119 (2006)
- 胡裕树, "现代汉语" (2011), 上海教育出版社