본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants. Patients and Methods: From June 2018 to June 2019, patients with a residual bone height of 4 mm in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to place SA implants (Osstem Implants, Korea) in Group A and NH implants (Hiossen, USA) in Group B. Finally, 14 implants placed in 13 patients in Group A and 17 implants placed in 14 patients in Group B were analyzed. The measured primary and secondary stability of each implant was represented by implant stability quotient (ISQ), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results: Group A consisted of patients with an average age of 62.2 years (range, 48-80 years), and Group B consisted of patients with an average age of 58.1 years (range, 35-82 years). Primary stability was 73.86±6.40 and 71.24±5.32 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.222). Secondary stability was 79.07±5.21 in Group A and 78.29±4.74 in Group B (P=0.667). A steep increase in ISQ during the healing period was observed in Group B, though it was not significant (P=0.265). The mean follow-up period was 378.5±164.6 days in Group A and 385.3±167.9 days in Group B. All implants in each group met the success criteria, and the success rate was 100%. Conclusion: Two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla with greater than 4 mm alveolar bone height exhibited successful one-year treatment outcomes if a primary stability of 65 or higher ISQ was obtained and a 3-month early loading protocol was applied.

Abstract

Objectives: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants. Patients and Methods: From June 2018 to June 2019, patients with a residual bone height of 4 mm in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to place SA implants (Osstem Implants, Korea) in Group A and NH implants (Hiossen, USA) in Group B. Finally, 14 implants placed in 13 patients in Group A and 17 implants placed in 14 patients in Group B were analyzed. The measured primary and secondary stability of each implant was represented by implant stability quotient (ISQ), and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Results: Group A consisted of patients with an average age of 62.2 years (range, 48-80 years), and Group B consisted of patients with an average age of 58.1 years (range, 35-82 years). Primary stability was 73.86±6.40 and 71.24±5.32 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.222). Secondary stability was 79.07±5.21 in Group A and 78.29±4.74 in Group B (P=0.667). A steep increase in ISQ during the healing period was observed in Group B, though it was not significant (P=0.265). The mean follow-up period was 378.5±164.6 days in Group A and 385.3±167.9 days in Group B. All implants in each group met the success criteria, and the success rate was 100%. Conclusion: Two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla with greater than 4 mm alveolar bone height exhibited successful one-year treatment outcomes if a primary stability of 65 or higher ISQ was obtained and a 3-month early loading protocol was applied.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Brånemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl, 16, pp.1~132 (1977)
  2. Sijia Zhang, "Immediate loading for implant restoration compared with early or conventional loading: A meta-analysis", Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(6), pp.793~803 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Guy Huynh‐Ba, "Immediate loading vs. early", conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients’ perspective: A systematic review, 2018, pp.29(S16), 255~269[DOI]
  4. M. Sommer, "Marginal bone loss one year after implantation: a systematic review of different loading protocols", International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(1), pp.121~134 (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Wennerberg A, "On implant surfaces : a review of current knowledge and opinions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.63~74 (2010)
  6. Tomas Albrektsson, "On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces", Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 21(S1), pp.4~7 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
  7. Naser Sargolzaie, "The evaluation of implant stability measured by resonance frequency analysis in different bone types", 대한구강악안면외과학회지, 45(1), pp.29~33 (2019), 대한구강악안면외과학회[DOI]
  8. Zarb GA, "Consensus report: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 80(6), pp.641~ (1998), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  9. Tomas Albrektsson, "Direct bone anchorage of dental implants", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 50(2), pp.255~261 (1983), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  10. Annette Rabel, "Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis", Clinical Oral Investigations, 11(3), pp.257~265 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  11. Raghavendra S, "Early wound healing around endosseous implants : a review of the literature", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.425~431 (2005)
  12. Serge Szmukler-Moncler, "Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 11(1), pp.12~25 (2000), Wiley[DOI]
  13. Rabah Nedir, "Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. A resonance-frequency analysis study with delayed and immediately loaded ITI SLA implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15(5), pp.520~528 (2004), Wiley[DOI]
  14. Schwartz Z, "Surface microtopography regulates osteointegration : the role of implant surface microtopography in osteointegration", Alpha Omegan, 98, pp.9~19 (2005)
  15. "Gottlow J, Barkarmo S, Sennerby L. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14 Suppl 1 : e204-12"[DOI]
  16. Michael S. Block, "Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs", Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 45(7), pp.601~607 (1987), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  17. Guo-li Yang, "Biomechanical Comparison of Biomimetically and Electrochemically Deposited Hydroxyapatite–Coated Porous Titanium Implants", Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 68(2), pp.420~427 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  18. Jessica J. Lee, "Survival of hydroxyapatite-coated implants: A meta-analytic review", Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(12), pp.1372~1379 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  19. Y YANG, "A review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process?an alternative to plasma spraying", Biomaterials, 26(3), pp.327~337 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Javad Yazdani, "A short view on nanohydroxyapatite as coating of dental implants", Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 105, pp.553~557 (2018), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  21. Marwa Madi, "Effect of Induced Periimplantitis on Dental Implants With and Without Ultrathin Hydroxyapatite Coating", Implant Dentistry, 25(1), pp.39~46 (2016), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  22. Marco Tallarico, "Do the New Hydrophilic Surface Have Any Influence on Early Success Rate and Implant Stability during Osseointegration Period? Four-Month Preliminary Results from a Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial", European Journal of Dentistry, 13(01), pp.095~101 (2019), Georg Thieme Verlag KG[DOI]
  23. P.M Brett, "Roughness response genes in osteoblasts", Bone, 35(1), pp.124~133 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Hendrik Terheyden, "Osseointegration - communication of cells", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(10), pp.1127~1135 (2012), Wiley[DOI]
  25. G. Zhao, "High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure", Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 74A(1), pp.49~58 (2005), Wiley[DOI]
  26. Smeets R, "Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration", Biomed Res Int, 2016, pp.6285620~ (2016)[DOI]
  27. R. Adell, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", International Journal of Oral Surgery, 10(6), pp.387~416 (1981), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  28. S. Sundén, "Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 6(4), pp.220~226 (1995), Wiley[DOI]
  29. N. Meredith, "Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 7(3), pp.261~267 (1996), Wiley[DOI]
  30. Piero Balleri, "Stability Measurements of Osseointegrated Implants Using Osstell in Partially Edentulous Jaws after 1 Year of Loading: A Pilot Study", Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 4(3), pp.128~132 (2002), Wiley[DOI]
  31. Atsumi M, "Methods used to assess implant stability : current status", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.743~754 (2007)
  32. Manisha Herekar, "A correlation between bone (B), insertion torque (IT), and implant stability (S): BITS score", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 112(4), pp.805~810 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  33. Zaid H. Baqain, "Early dental implant failure: risk factors", British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50(3), pp.239~243 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. B.R. Chrcanovic, "Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures", Journal of Dental Research, 95(9), pp.995~1002 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  35. Seong-Beom Kim, "Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 8(5), pp.396~403 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  36. Young-Kyun Kim, "Prospective Comparative Study of Tapered Implants with SLA Surfaces in the Maxillary Posterior Area According to 3- and 6-Month Loading Time", The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 35(2), pp.271~276 (2015), Quintessence Publishing[DOI]
  37. Vladimir S. Todorovic, "Stability Development of Immediately Loaded Hybrid Self-Tapping Implants Inserted in the Posterior Maxilla: 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial", Journal of Oral Implantology, 43(1), pp.33~38 (2017), American Academy of Implant Dentistry[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading김영균, 김지윤, 윤필영, 이양진, Sang-Yun Kim, Seong-Beom Kim대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2016 · 제8권 제5호Randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two types of sandblasted with large-grit and acid-etched surface implants with different surface roughness윤필영, Jeon Jun-Hyung, Jo Deuk-Won, Kim Min-Joong, Kim Young-Kyun대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2022 · 제48권 제4호Evaluation of Dental Implant Stability with or without Photoactivated Surface Treatment강재석, 손미경, 허유리대한구강악안면임플란트학회 · 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지2021 · 제25권 제2호A resonance frequency analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched implants with different diameters: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period김연강, 김현주, 이주연, 주지영대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2017 · 제47권 제2호Clinical outcome of immediately and early loaded implants with laser treated surface: a 3-year retrospective study서진호, 이성복, 조성암대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2018 · 제10권 제2호Evaluation of the stability of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implants with tapered straight body design김용건, 이규복대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2018 · 제34권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)