본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

연세대 소장 한글필사본《슈양의?》에 대하여

The Study of Korean manuscript 〈Su-yang-eui-sa〉stored at the Library of Yonsei University

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The study of Korean manuscript <Su-yang-eui-sa슈양의>(1 volume) stored at the Library of Yonsei University was translated from the <Sui-Yang-di-Yan-shi隋煬帝艶史>(8 volumes 40 chapters) the historical novel in Ming Dynasty.The study of Korean manuscript <Su-yang-eui-sa>is difficult to know the specific period of this book, it is certain that it might had been distributed and read after 18th century at latest. Comparing with the original version, the Korean manuscript<Su-yang-eui-sa>has some errors in spellings of Chinese pronunciation of the names of characters, and title. Judging from this points, we can consider that this book is supposed to be translated from another Korean version.It had been taken the faithful translation style with the original version and contracted and omitted the unrelated poems and dialogues at once to focus on the story itself. This translation style would be the better impact on the story developed rapidly and the volumes shortened also.Generally old translation novels are good sources in the Korean philological study because it is abundant of word sources and easy to select the adequate Korean words for translation. We can guess this novel copied in 19th due to the archaic words and expression styles. The study of the old translation novels such as<Su-yang-eui-sa>will be very helpful not only to understand the introduction and translation style of Chinese novels of those days, but also excavate Korean archaic words. Since it had great influence on the development and growth of the Korean old novels, it will be a good materials to understand the distinctive of Korean old novels.

Abstract

The study of Korean manuscript <Su-yang-eui-sa슈양의>(1 volume) stored at the Library of Yonsei University was translated from the <Sui-Yang-di-Yan-shi隋煬帝艶史>(8 volumes 40 chapters) the historical novel in Ming Dynasty.The study of Korean manuscript <Su-yang-eui-sa>is difficult to know the specific period of this book, it is certain that it might had been distributed and read after 18th century at latest. Comparing with the original version, the Korean manuscript<Su-yang-eui-sa>has some errors in spellings of Chinese pronunciation of the names of characters, and title. Judging from this points, we can consider that this book is supposed to be translated from another Korean version.It had been taken the faithful translation style with the original version and contracted and omitted the unrelated poems and dialogues at once to focus on the story itself. This translation style would be the better impact on the story developed rapidly and the volumes shortened also.Generally old translation novels are good sources in the Korean philological study because it is abundant of word sources and easy to select the adequate Korean words for translation. We can guess this novel copied in 19th due to the archaic words and expression styles. The study of the old translation novels such as<Su-yang-eui-sa>will be very helpful not only to understand the introduction and translation style of Chinese novels of those days, but also excavate Korean archaic words. Since it had great influence on the development and growth of the Korean old novels, it will be a good materials to understand the distinctive of Korean old novels.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 《슈당연의》 1책, "국립중앙도서관 소장"
  2. 江蘇省社會科學院 明淸小說硏究中心 文學硏究所 編, "中國通俗小說總目提要" (1990)
  3. 박재연, "홍루몽 고어사전" (2005), 이회문화사
  4. 조희웅, "고전소설연구보정 (上,下)" (2006), 박이정
  5. 中國古代小說百科全書編輯委員會 編, "中國古代小說百科全書" (1993), 中國大百科全書出版社
  6. 한글학회, "우리말 큰사전옛말과 이두" (1992)
  7. 송일기, "海南綠雨堂의 古文獻 (一,二)" (2003), 태학사
  8. 안병희, "중세국어문법론" (1990)
  9. 完山李氏, "中國小說繪模本", 《한국고소설비평자료성》 (1993), 강원대출판부 아세아문화사
  10. 전인초, "韓國所藏 中國漢籍總目 (1~6)" (2005), 학고방
  11. 丁錫根, "中國歷代序跋集", pp.950~ (1996), (中) 人民文學出版社
  12. 鄭振鐸, "揷圖本中國文學史 一二" (1998), 花山文藝出版社
  13. 차미애, "낙서 윤덕희 회화연구" (2002)
  14. 강전섭, "언문목녹(諺文冊目錄) 小考" (1995), 중앙문화사
  15. 紀德君, "論明淸歷史演義作家的創作動機", 151期 (2004)
  16. 박재연, "隋唐演義 번역본의 연구" (1986)
  17. 안병희, "왕실자료의 한글 필사본에 대한 국어학적 검토", 1 (1999)
  18. 于盛庭, "於隋煬帝艶史的作者" (1989)
  19. 유춘동, "책열명록에 대하여", (53) (2006), 태학사
  20. 이현희, "장서각 소장의 영조대 한글 문헌", 2 (1999)
  21. 조항범, "영조 어제류 한글 필사본의 어휘론적 고찰", 11 (2004)
  22. 최용철, "中國 禁書小說의 國內流入과 影響" (1987)
  23. 황문환, "영조 어제류 한글 필사본의 문법론적 특징", 11 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)