본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 동아시아 위생 개념의 확산과 공공의료 담론의 형성

The Spread of Hygiene Concepts and the Making of Public Health Discourse in Modern East Asia

1

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

If public health can be defined as “all activities to ensure universal medical use of the people and protect and promote health,” it can be said that public health emerged in the process of developing the concept of hygiene in East Asia. While traditional hygiene emphasized individual curing and longevity, modern hygiene was the state in charge of individual body and discipline. East Asian countries had to practice modern tasks in the field of hygiene and medical care in line with the construction of modern countries, and it was considered legitimate for modern countries to intervene in individual bodies. As the demand for modern national construction became stronger, interest in public health rather than personal hygiene increased. In East Asia, a new interpretation of the concept of hygiene began in Japan. Sensai Nagayo(1838-1902) newly defined the concept of ‘sanitation’ to justify the physical intervention of the modern state in Meiji period. The concept of ‘public health’ began to be used in earnest in 1890, when Ogai Mori(1862-1922) translated Western-style health protection measures for the public as public health. Since then, public health has evolved into a universal social discourse in Japan. Japan’s public health expanded to colonial Joseon, Taiwan, and China. Japan’s victory in the Sino-Japanese War led East Asian countries to believe that hygiene was the root of the Japanese nation’s power. In the early 20th century, the government of the Republic of China began to imitate the case of Japan while promoting modern education reform and institutional reform. Japanese-style ‘public health’ was transplanted into various hygiene laws and sanitary equipment. In Korea, modern hygiene was introduced and spread from the end of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century, and the concept of ‘public health’ in Japan was mainly spreading. Public health in Japan was vaguely defined as an activity to protect and promote the health of the people, but in practice, it was focused on improving quarantine and environmental infrastructure. In response, the concept of American-style public health, which values prevention and treatment at the same time, has already begun to emerge under the Japanese colonial rule. In East Asia in the 1920s and 1930s, Japanese-style public health and American-style public health discourse competed, and measures to solve medical inequality were discussed in earnest. Interestingly, in common in East Asian countries, Actual Medical Expenses Campaigns to improve medical access at low cost and social medicine to universally provide prevention and treatment to the people have drawn attention. This was also a phenomenon caused by intensifying medical inequality as rapid urbanization and industrialization progressed in East Asian countries in the first half of the 20th century. Although it was impossible to resolve social contradictions or move toward fundamental reform of the national medical system due to the nature of the private movement, the actual medical movement further imprinted the need for public health care in the country and society. Social medicine studied the effects and relationships of the social environment on diseases and health, and studied ways to promote public health by using preventive medicine and therapeutic medicine. If social medicine was supported by state power, it was possible to go forward with practice such as State Medicine like China, otherwise it would only be a civilian movement such as the People’s Health Movement, as in colonial Korea. Liberation and the Korean War were a dramatic turning point in American-style health that led to Japanese-style hygiene. Immediately after Liberation, there was a discussion between the left and right camps over medical nationalization to enhance the publicity of medical care. The medical community was sympathetic to the nationalization of medical care, but due to the lack of medical personnel and financial resources, specific alternatives could not be proposed. As American- style health studies gradually expanded their influence after the Korean War, American-style public health, which emphasized prevention and treatment activities, became established, and efforts were made to establish a health center system.

Abstract

If public health can be defined as “all activities to ensure universal medical use of the people and protect and promote health,” it can be said that public health emerged in the process of developing the concept of hygiene in East Asia. While traditional hygiene emphasized individual curing and longevity, modern hygiene was the state in charge of individual body and discipline. East Asian countries had to practice modern tasks in the field of hygiene and medical care in line with the construction of modern countries, and it was considered legitimate for modern countries to intervene in individual bodies. As the demand for modern national construction became stronger, interest in public health rather than personal hygiene increased. In East Asia, a new interpretation of the concept of hygiene began in Japan. Sensai Nagayo(1838-1902) newly defined the concept of ‘sanitation’ to justify the physical intervention of the modern state in Meiji period. The concept of ‘public health’ began to be used in earnest in 1890, when Ogai Mori(1862-1922) translated Western-style health protection measures for the public as public health. Since then, public health has evolved into a universal social discourse in Japan. Japan’s public health expanded to colonial Joseon, Taiwan, and China. Japan’s victory in the Sino-Japanese War led East Asian countries to believe that hygiene was the root of the Japanese nation’s power. In the early 20th century, the government of the Republic of China began to imitate the case of Japan while promoting modern education reform and institutional reform. Japanese-style ‘public health’ was transplanted into various hygiene laws and sanitary equipment. In Korea, modern hygiene was introduced and spread from the end of the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century, and the concept of ‘public health’ in Japan was mainly spreading. Public health in Japan was vaguely defined as an activity to protect and promote the health of the people, but in practice, it was focused on improving quarantine and environmental infrastructure. In response, the concept of American-style public health, which values prevention and treatment at the same time, has already begun to emerge under the Japanese colonial rule. In East Asia in the 1920s and 1930s, Japanese-style public health and American-style public health discourse competed, and measures to solve medical inequality were discussed in earnest. Interestingly, in common in East Asian countries, Actual Medical Expenses Campaigns to improve medical access at low cost and social medicine to universally provide prevention and treatment to the people have drawn attention. This was also a phenomenon caused by intensifying medical inequality as rapid urbanization and industrialization progressed in East Asian countries in the first half of the 20th century. Although it was impossible to resolve social contradictions or move toward fundamental reform of the national medical system due to the nature of the private movement, the actual medical movement further imprinted the need for public health care in the country and society. Social medicine studied the effects and relationships of the social environment on diseases and health, and studied ways to promote public health by using preventive medicine and therapeutic medicine. If social medicine was supported by state power, it was possible to go forward with practice such as State Medicine like China, otherwise it would only be a civilian movement such as the People’s Health Movement, as in colonial Korea. Liberation and the Korean War were a dramatic turning point in American-style health that led to Japanese-style hygiene. Immediately after Liberation, there was a discussion between the left and right camps over medical nationalization to enhance the publicity of medical care. The medical community was sympathetic to the nationalization of medical care, but due to the lack of medical personnel and financial resources, specific alternatives could not be proposed. As American- style health studies gradually expanded their influence after the Korean War, American-style public health, which emphasized prevention and treatment activities, became established, and efforts were made to establish a health center system.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. "東光", ~
  2. "東亞日報", ~
  3. "保健運動", ~
  4. "時兆", ~
  5. "神州日報", ~
  6. "衛生月刊 (上海)", ~
  7. "朝鮮總督府官報", ~
  8. "The China Medical Journal", ~
  9. 蘭安生, "北京公共衛生芻議" (1925), 中央防疫處
  10. 社團法人實費診療所 編輯部, "社團法人實費診療所の歴史及事業 第3巻" (1935), 社團法人實費診療所
  11. 小川鼎三, "松本順自傳·長與專齊自傳-松香私志-" (1980), 平凡社
  12. 吳秀三, "中學生理衛生學敎科書" (1909), 文明書局
  13. 任璟宰, "中等 生理衛生學" (1907), 徽文館
  14. 長與專齋, "衛生意見", 國立國會圖書館憲政資料室所藏, 『大久保利通文書』 資料番號327, ~ (1877)
  15. 黃子方, "中國衛生芻議" (1927), 中央防疫處疫務科
  16. 김영희, "근대일본의 공중위생관념 형성과정 - 지방순찰사복명서(地方巡察使復命書)를 중심으로 -", 일본학보, (102), pp.165~182 (2015), 한국일본학회
  17. 김진혁, "해방직후 보건의료체계논쟁과 통일국가 보건의료정책 구상", 의사학, 30(3), pp.499~546 (2021), 대한의사학회
  18. 김창엽, "건강의 공공성과 공공보건의료" (2019), 한울아카데미 : 한울엠플러스
  19. 박윤재, "조선총독부의 지방 의료정책과 의료 소비", 역사문제연구, 13(1), pp.161~183 (2009), 역사문제연구소
  20. 박윤재, "한국 근대의학의 기원" (2005), 혜안
  21. 박윤형, "민간의료가 대신하는 공공의료 : 공공의료 개념의 재정립 방안을 생각하며", 의료정책포럼, 2(2), pp.10~14 (2004)
  22. 박지영, "식민지 위생학자 이인규의 공중보건 활동과 연구", 의료사회사연구, 4, pp.39~76 (2019), 의료역사연구회[DOI]
  23. 신규환, "한국 근대 사립병원의 발전과정- 1885년~1960년대까지 -", 의사학, 11(1), pp.5~ (2002), 대한의사학회
  24. 신규환, "식민지 지식인의 초상 : 김창세와 상하이 코스모폴리탄의 길", 역사와 문화, (23), pp.449~470 (2012), 문화사학회[DOI]
  25. 신규환, "1870-80년대 일본의 콜레라 유행과 근대적 방역체계의 형성", 사림, (64), pp.253~278 (2018), 수선사학회[DOI]
  26. 신규환, "해방 이후 남북 의학교육체계의 성립과 발전 — 이용설과 최명학의 생애와 의학인식을 중심으로", 인문논총, 74(1), pp.215~245 (2017), 인문학연구원[DOI]
  27. 신규환, "해방 전후기 의료계의 의학인식과 사립병원의 발전: 재단법인 백병원을 중심으로", 의료사회사연구, 1, pp.75~103 (2018), 의료역사연구회[DOI]
  28. 신규환, "북경의 붉은 의사들 : 20세기 청년의사들의 도시건설과 위생실험" (2020), 역사공간
  29. 신규환, "페스트 제국의 탄생 : 제3차 페스트 팬데믹과 동아시아" (2020), 역사공간
  30. 신동원, "한국근대보건의료사" (1997), 한울
  31. 이순영, "1930년대 초반 경성의 의료접근성 문제와 부립경비진료소 설치 논쟁", 역사와 현실, (114), pp.205~247 (2019), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  32. 이은혜, "공공의료와 공공병원정책에 대한 바른 개념잡기 : 김윤 기고문에 대한 비판적 고찰", 의료정책포럼, 18(2), pp.47~55 (2020)
  33. 전민호, "개화기 학교교육에서 근대적 위생개념의 형성", 한국교육학연구, 26(2), pp.231~257 (2020), 안암교육학회[DOI]
  34. 정일영, "일제 식민지기‘원산노동병원’의 설립과 그 의의", 의사학, 25(3), pp.445~488 (2016), 대한의사학회[DOI]
  35. 조정은, "近代 衛生論의 소개와 上海<<衛生白話報>>", 중국사연구, (115), pp.105~134 (2018), 중국사학회[DOI]
  36. 조정은, "중국 근대 의학교육체제의 모색 : 베이징협화의학원(PUMC)의 영미파 서의(西醫)를 중심으로", 중국학보, (93), pp.233~259 (2020), 한국중국학회
  37. 최규진, "역사 속 공공병원 설립운동을 찾아서", 의료와사회, 11, pp.144~157 (2022)
  38. 橋本正己, "公衆衛生の歷史的發展と課題", 季刊社會保障硏究, 3(2), pp.2~14 (1967)
  39. 多田羅浩三, "公衆衛生の黎明期からこれまでの歩み", 日本公衆衛生雜誌, 65(6), pp.255~265 (2018)
  40. 大瀧敦子, "占領期の保健所法改正に伴うソーシャルワーク導入の過程分析 : 衆参両議院厚生委員会において", 明治學院大學社會學·社會福祉學硏究, 140, pp.149~178 (2013)
  41. 羅振宇, ""救己"到"救人" : 工部局早期醫療服務與城市公共醫療的起源(1854-1898)", 江蘇社會科學, (3), pp.239~247 (2014)
  42. 路彩霞, "淸末京津公共衛生機制演進硏究(1900-1911)" (2010), 湖北人民出版社
  43. 雷祥麟, "衛生爲何不是保衛生命? 民國時期另類的衛生, 自我, 與疾病", 臺灣社會研究季刊, 54, pp.17~59 (2004)
  44. 龍澤利行, "近代日本における社會衛生学の展開とその特質", 日本醫史學雜誌, 40(2), pp.111~132 (1994)
  45. 劉士永, "‘清潔’, ‘衛生’與‘保健’ : 日治時期臺灣社會公共衛生觀念之轉變", 臺灣史硏究, 8(1), pp.40~88 (2001)
  46. 笠原英彦, "近代日本における衛生行政論の展開 : 長與專齋と後藤新平", 法學硏究, 69(1), pp.87~110 (1996)
  47. 笠原英彦, "明治十年代における衛生行政 : 後藤新平と日本的衛生槪念の形性", 法學硏究, 70(8), pp.1~22 (1997)
  48. 笠原英彦, "長與專齋の"衛生意見"とアメリカ衛生行政", 法政論叢, 38(2), pp.40~48 (2002)
  49. 笠原英彦, "明治前期における"自治衛生"と"衛生工事"", 法政論叢, 40(1), pp.158~165 (2003)
  50. 飯島渉, "ペストと近代中國" (2000), 硏文出版
  51. 飯島渉, "感染症の中國史" (2009), 中公新書
  52. 付馨悅, "近代漢譯日本中學生生理衛生敎科書研究(1902-1912)", 自然辨證法通訊(北京), 43(5), pp.59~66 (2021)
  53. 西村万里子, "日本最初の健康保險法(1922年)の成立と社會政策 : 救濟事業から社會政策への轉換", 三田學會雜誌, 83(特別), pp.138~154 (1990)
  54. 成田龍一, "講座 世界史4 資本主義は人をどう變えてきたか", pp.375~401 (1995), 東京大學出版會
  55. 新村拓, "日本醫療史" (2006), 吉川弘文館
  56. 余新忠, "清末における‘衛生’概念の展開", 東洋史研究, 64(3), pp.560~596 (2005)
  57. 余新忠, "淸代衛生防疫機制及其近代演變" (2016), 北京師範大學出版社
  58. 張仲民, "出版與文化政治 : 晚淸的"衛生"書籍硏究" (2009), 上海書店出版社
  59. 津川友介, "包括的で持続的な発展のためのユニバーサル·ヘルス·カバレッジ―日本からの教訓", pp.215~231 (2014), 日本国際交流センター
  60. 平川則男, "公衆衛生の環境変化に伴う保健所機能の変遷と課題 : 新たな感染症の時代を踏まえて", 自治總硏, 513, pp.1~26 (2021)
  61. 丸井英二, "Public Healthと公衆衛生學", 醫學敎育, 43(3), pp.147~150 (2012)
  62. Rogaski, Ruth, "Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-port China" (2004), University of California Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)