노자 도덕경 기호체계의 상호텍스트성 연구
A study on the intertextuality of symbol system in Laozi Daodejing
1
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper mainly describes two points on Laozi's text: one isdistinguished achievement of his denial(否定) and in-existing(內外竝存)transcendence(超越) writing style, the other is Laozi's peculiarperspective of ambivalence to the truth of the universe. I think Laoziand Zhuangzi may presuppose that there are mutual interactionsbetween essential world and the phenomenal world. In Zhuangzi’s aspect,Inshi(因是) could be transferred into material incarnation(物化) based onthe fable of butterfly's dream(蝴蝶夢). Laozi also considers that‘arising-together’(竝作) and ‘embracing to oneness’(抱一) are based on theaspects of ambivalent perspective of the world. As a result, Laoziemphasizes that intertextuality between binary oppositions, same asbeing and nothing, good and evil, haps and mishaps and so on. We cansay that Laozi maintained distinctive perspective of ambivalence to allover the things in the world. We could say his thoughts still has ameaningful influence to the Eastern and Western culture, philosophy,ethics, politics, and aesthetics.
Abstract
This paper mainly describes two points on Laozi's text: one isdistinguished achievement of his denial(否定) and in-existing(內外竝存)transcendence(超越) writing style, the other is Laozi's peculiarperspective of ambivalence to the truth of the universe. I think Laoziand Zhuangzi may presuppose that there are mutual interactionsbetween essential world and the phenomenal world. In Zhuangzi’s aspect,Inshi(因是) could be transferred into material incarnation(物化) based onthe fable of butterfly's dream(蝴蝶夢). Laozi also considers that‘arising-together’(竝作) and ‘embracing to oneness’(抱一) are based on theaspects of ambivalent perspective of the world. As a result, Laoziemphasizes that intertextuality between binary oppositions, same asbeing and nothing, good and evil, haps and mishaps and so on. We cansay that Laozi maintained distinctive perspective of ambivalence to allover the things in the world. We could say his thoughts still has ameaningful influence to the Eastern and Western culture, philosophy,ethics, politics, and aesthetics.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김동규, "하이데거의 사이-예술론" (2009), 그린비
- 김상일, "알랭바디우와 철학의 새로운 시작: 존재와 사건과 도덕경의 지평융합을 위한 한 시도, 1,2" (2008), 새물결
- 김충열, "김충열 교수의 노자강의" (2011), 예문서원
- 김학주, "노자와 도가사상" (2007), 명문당
- 김형효, "老莊사상의 해체적 독법" (1999), 청계
- 김형효, "사유하는 도덕경" (2004), 소나무
- 류영모, "노자와 다석-다석사상으로 다시 읽는 도덕경" (2013), 교양인
- 毛宗三, "모종삼교수의 노자철학 강의" (2011), 광사
- 김학목, "박세당의 노자" (1999), 예문서원
- 오강남, "도덕경" (1995), 현암사
- 오태석, "중국시의 문예심미적 지형" (2014), 글누림
- 오태석, "은유와 유동의 기호학 ― 周易", 중국어문학지, (37), pp.7~50 (2011), 중국어문학회
- 오태석, "장자의 꿈 ― 초월⋅해체⋅역설의 글쓰기", 중국어문학지, (45), pp.31~85 (2013), 중국어문학회
- 王弼, "왕필의 노자주" (2012), 한길사
- 이경재, "非의 시학 : 노자와 서양사상" (2000), 다산글방
- 이광세, "이강수 읽기를 통해본 노장철학연구의 현주소" (2005), 예문서원
- 임헌규, "노자 도덕경 해설―왕필본, 백서본, 죽간본의 비교 분석" (2005), 철학과 현실사
- 陳鼓應, "진고응이 풀이한 노자" (2008), 영남대학교출판부
- Charles Seife, "無의 수학, 無限의 수학" (2011), 시스테마