『老子』 대립구조의 유형과 함의 분석
Analysis of the Types and Implications of the 『LAOZI』 Opposition Structure
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we have examined the types and implications of the 『LAOZI』 opposition structure. The opposition structure can be divided into four types. The first is a positive equal opposition structure of ‘A-B’ type. The meaning types and units of the two opposing pairs are the same. Second, there is a positive analogous opposition structure of ‘A-b’ type. The semantic type and unit are not the same, and the opposite result, method (b), etc. for a single opposite (A), are mainly shown. Third is the negative equal opposition structure of ‘A-不A’. It is composed of affirmative and irregular forms for one opposition. Finally, it is a negative analogous opposition structure of ‘A-不a’ type. The implications of the opposition structure can be seen from three points of view. First, it is a viewpoint of the value difference of the two opposites. This implies the implication of the ‘去彼取此’ and ‘本末’. Next, it is a viewpoint of the value equal, which conveys four messages. The Meaningless for the relative distinction between the two opposites, the recognition of this natural value, complementarity, and dialectical motility. Finally, it shows the perception and results that are contradictory to the present. It also shows the contradictory perceptions and results of the ‘道’`s attributes or the ‘道者’`s acts and may also represent contradictory results, methods, and attributes of the present behavior or event.
Abstract
In this study, we have examined the types and implications of the 『LAOZI』 opposition structure. The opposition structure can be divided into four types. The first is a positive equal opposition structure of ‘A-B’ type. The meaning types and units of the two opposing pairs are the same. Second, there is a positive analogous opposition structure of ‘A-b’ type. The semantic type and unit are not the same, and the opposite result, method (b), etc. for a single opposite (A), are mainly shown. Third is the negative equal opposition structure of ‘A-不A’. It is composed of affirmative and irregular forms for one opposition. Finally, it is a negative analogous opposition structure of ‘A-不a’ type. The implications of the opposition structure can be seen from three points of view. First, it is a viewpoint of the value difference of the two opposites. This implies the implication of the ‘去彼取此’ and ‘本末’. Next, it is a viewpoint of the value equal, which conveys four messages. The Meaningless for the relative distinction between the two opposites, the recognition of this natural value, complementarity, and dialectical motility. Finally, it shows the perception and results that are contradictory to the present. It also shows the contradictory perceptions and results of the ‘道’`s attributes or the ‘道者’`s acts and may also represent contradictory results, methods, and attributes of the present behavior or event.
참고문헌 (23)
- 吳澄, "道德眞經吳澄注" (2010), 華東師範大學出版社
- 林希逸, "老子鬳齋口義" (2009), 華東師範大學出版社
- 範應元, "老子道德經古本集注" (2010), 華東師範大學出版社
- 高明, "帛書老子校注" (1996), 中華書局
- 高亨, "老子註釋" (1980), 河南人民出版社
- 林語堂, "老子的知慧" (2004), 陝西師範大學出版社
- 許抗生, "帛書老子註釋及硏究" (1982), 折江人民出版社
- 㚆旦大學哲學係老子註釋組, "老子註釋" (1977), 上海人民出版社
- 朱謙之, "老子校釋" (1984), 中華書局
- 陳鼓應, "老子今注今譯" (2003), 商務印書館
- 馮友蘭, "中國哲學簡史" (2004), 新世界出版社
- 안동림, "장자" (1993), 현암사
- 최진석, "老子의 목소리로 듣는 도덕경" (2001), 소나무
- 최진석, "老子義疏" (2007), 소나무
- 김학목, "老子 도덕경과 王弼의 주" (2012), 홍익출판사
- 임채우, "王弼의 老子주" (2005), 한길사
- 김용옥, "老子와 21세기" (1999), 통나무
- 이경무, "노자 철학에 있어서의 역설과 부정", 범한철학, 59(4), pp.25~47 (2010), 범한철학회
- 안희진, "『노자』, 그 ‘역설’의 문학을 논함", 중국학, (51), pp.75~96 (2015), 대한중국학회
- 오진탁, "『도덕경』에서 ‘正言若反’의 철학적 함의", 인문학연구, 2ㆍ3 (1996)
- 오태석, "노자 도덕경 기호체계의 상호텍스트성 연구", 중국어문학지, (49), pp.51~96 (2014), 중국어문학회
- 오태석, "역설의 즐거움: 老莊 존재론의 否定性", 중국어문학지, (51), pp.7~47 (2015), 중국어문학회
- 이소동, "《老子》 ‘道’, ‘有’, ‘無’의 관계에 대한 문맥적 고찰", 중국문학연구, (70), pp.151~173 (2018), 한국중문학회[DOI]
