老子의 글쓰기 전략에 대한 몇 가지 검토
Several Reviews of the Writing Strategy of Lao Tzu
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Through this review, it is confirmed that the fundamental writing strategy of Lao Tzu starts from basic recognition about the relationship between human’s thinking and language. His outstanding writing skills are shown in that Lao Tzu denied language itself in terms of his critical thinking as to human’s attempts to image and promote inherent nature. From the perspective of Lao Tzu, although the ‘Dao’ is the real value of human pursuit, it is hard to express this entirely by human language. To sum up, as Lao Tzu’s premise was the existence of conscience or recognition before its expression of language, we should understand his insight to language not as black and white but as the paradox that there is no way to explain Dao without language. As reviewed in this paper, we can assume that Thus, it is impossible to show all perspectives of Dao in that Dao is complete, eternal, comprehensive, and natural because it doesn’t have any light, sound, and face. Lao Tzu has twofold stance in that he leaves his own text with recognizing the contradiction that the thinking expressed by language is not inherent thinking. Lao Tzu is the excellent magician of language who efforts to put Dao into the fixed frame called language, while denying preserving human’s thinking in the frame of language. As shown in this paper, we should know that the use of infinitives in the linguistic expression and conceptual rule of ‘Dao’ shows the aspects of paradoxical writing pursuing revealing the characteristics of ‘Dao’. Namely, as though ‘Dao’ is the absolute being disapproving any conceptual rule which cannot be named something, for those who don’t understand ‘Dao’ the tool ‘language’ is needed and by linguistic technique like infinitive, figure of speech, and metaphor he wanted to improve persuasive power of his text.
Abstract
Through this review, it is confirmed that the fundamental writing strategy of Lao Tzu starts from basic recognition about the relationship between human’s thinking and language. His outstanding writing skills are shown in that Lao Tzu denied language itself in terms of his critical thinking as to human’s attempts to image and promote inherent nature. From the perspective of Lao Tzu, although the ‘Dao’ is the real value of human pursuit, it is hard to express this entirely by human language. To sum up, as Lao Tzu’s premise was the existence of conscience or recognition before its expression of language, we should understand his insight to language not as black and white but as the paradox that there is no way to explain Dao without language. As reviewed in this paper, we can assume that Thus, it is impossible to show all perspectives of Dao in that Dao is complete, eternal, comprehensive, and natural because it doesn’t have any light, sound, and face. Lao Tzu has twofold stance in that he leaves his own text with recognizing the contradiction that the thinking expressed by language is not inherent thinking. Lao Tzu is the excellent magician of language who efforts to put Dao into the fixed frame called language, while denying preserving human’s thinking in the frame of language. As shown in this paper, we should know that the use of infinitives in the linguistic expression and conceptual rule of ‘Dao’ shows the aspects of paradoxical writing pursuing revealing the characteristics of ‘Dao’. Namely, as though ‘Dao’ is the absolute being disapproving any conceptual rule which cannot be named something, for those who don’t understand ‘Dao’ the tool ‘language’ is needed and by linguistic technique like infinitive, figure of speech, and metaphor he wanted to improve persuasive power of his text.
참고문헌 (39)
- 高明, "帛書老子校注" (2009), 中華書局
- 嚴靈峰, "老子硏究" (1979), 中華書局
- 許抗生, "老子与道家 (上,下)" (2012), 宗教文化出版社
- 陳鼓應, "老子今註今譯及評價" (1970), 商務印書館
- 譚寶剛, "老子及其遺著研究" (2009), 巴蜀書社
- 李零, "人往底處走" (2008), 三聯書店
- 徐復觀, "中國人性論史 (先秦論)" (1963), 商務印書館
- 陳望道, "修辭學發凡" (1997), 上海敎育出版社
- 張少康, "先秦諸子的文藝觀" (1984), 上海文藝出版社
- 施昌東, "先秦諸子美學思想述評" (1990), 中華書局
- 박이문, "老莊思想" (1985), 문학과 지성사
- 정세근, "노장철학" (2002), 철학과 현실사
- 이강수, "노자와 장자" (2002), 길
- 문승용, "韓非子에 나타난 修辭意識의 形成 淵源 考", 수사학, (16), pp.97~119 (2012), 한국수사학회
- 劉雲漢, "正言若反— 老子的悖異修辞", 河北學刊 (2011)
- 孫中原, "正言若反- 老子的辨證論理", 河北社會科學 (2008)
- 王靜, "老子悖論的顺應論解釋", 求索 (2011)
- 羅光, "中國哲學思想史 (先秦篇)" (1982), 學生書局
- 任繼愈, "老子新譯" (1986), 上海古籍出版社
- 임홍빈, "否定의 樣相", 서울대, 교양과정부 논문집 (인문‧사회), 5 (1973)
- 김충렬, "김충열 교수의 노장철학강의" (1995), 예문서원
- 本協立, "“言意之辨”: 語言的局限性與文學的重要性", 文史哲, (2) (1994)
- 김원중, "중국문학이론의 세계" (2002), 을유문화사
- 王邦雄, "老子的哲學" (1980), 東大圖書有限公司
- 李載權, "魏晉玄學에 있어서의 言意之辯에 관한 연구 : 王弼의 得意忘言論을 중심으로", 박사, 철학, pp.1990
- 류성태, "노자의 지식관 연구", 범한철학, 34(3), pp.267~297 (2004), 범한철학회
- 이상옥, "도가 철학 미학 해석의 이중성 —노자, 왕필과 왕국유를 중심으로—", 도교문화연구, (29), pp.199~222 (2008), 한국도교문화학회
- 안희진, "논리를 넘어선 직관의 문학 기제 -≪노자≫의 ‘비유’를 논함", 중국어문학, (59), pp.27~59 (2012), 영남중국어문학회[DOI]
- 박영희, "『老子』의 逆說에 대한 이야기식 해설의 함정 ―『韓非子』·「喩老」편을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (64), pp.487~506 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 이경무, "노자 철학에 있어서의 역설과 부정", 범한철학, 59(4), pp.25~47 (2010), 범한철학회
- 이재권, "노자 철학에서 名의 意味", 범한철학, 17 (1998)
- 박영학, "장주의 수사에 관한 연구", 언론과학연구, 1(1) (2001)
- 김남희, "현대시 교육에서 시론의 위치 - 반어와 역설을 중심으로-", 문학교육학, (49), pp.119~144 (2015), 한국문학교육학회
- 이정민, "언어이론과 현대과학사상" (1987), 서울대출판부
- 이규호, "말의 힘" (1992), 제일출판사
- Rudolf G. Wagner, "A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing-Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation State" (2003), University of New York Press
- James J. Y. Liu, "Language-Paradox-Poetics" (1987), Princeton University Press
- 김원중, "《노자》 텍스트에 있어서의 부정과 역설의 미학 ― “道可道, 非常道”를 중심으로", 중국어문논역총간, (32), pp.3~25 (2013), 중국어문논역학회
- 김원중, "《韓非子》를 통해서 본 韓非子의 글쓰기 전략에 관한 몇 가지 검토", 중국학논총, (49), pp.99~122 (2016), 한국중국문화학회