본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신문기사 읽기를 활용한 소집단 의사결정 과정 양상 -기후변화 관련 사회적 논쟁 활동을 중심으로-

The Aspects of Small Group Decision-making Process based on Reading News Reports: Focused on Climate Change related Socio-scientific Issues Activity

이정아|김종욱|권지연|김찬종|하윤희|최승언|곽제연
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2018.04|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제38권 제2호|pp. 203-217|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.203

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기후변화비판적 담화 분석critical discourse analysisclimate changesocio-scientific issuesdecision-making process뉴스 기사미디어 텍스트news reportmedia text의사 결정 과정과학과 관련된 사회적 논쟁
주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 기후변화 관련 사회적 논쟁 활동에서 신문기사 읽기에 따른 고등학생들의 소집단 의사결정 과정의 양상을 분석하는 것이다. 과학과 관련된 사회적 논쟁(SSI) 관련 수업 맥락에서 학생들이 접하는 정보는 절대적으로 신문이나 TV 등의 미디어 텍스트라는 점에서 텍스트와 의사결정 과정간의 관계를 밝히는 것은 중요한 문제라 할 수 있다. 연구에는 경기도 소재 고등학교에 재학 중인 1, 2학년 학생 22명이 참여하였다. 학생들에게는 유엔 기후변화협약 당사국 총회에 대해 보도한 두 편의 신문기사가 제공되었으며, 파리기후변화 협정에 우리나라가 가입하는 것에 동의하는지에 대한 개인 및 소집단 의사결정을 요구하였다. 신문기사는 비판적 담화분석에 근거해 분석 하였으며, 소집단 의사결정 과정은 문제인식과 대안 평가 및 선택에서 드러나는 특징에 주목했다. 신문기사 분석을 통해 기후변화협정은 각국의 경제적 이권과 패권의 추구라는 복잡한 이데올로기가 자리 잡고 있음을 확인할 수 있었다. 한편 소집단의 문제인식 단계에서 기후변화협정에 대해 학생들이 지니는 상이한 프레임과 신문기사가 전경화한 주요 담론은 소집단이 논쟁점을 인식하는 데 주요한 변인이 됨을 알 수 있었다. 대안평가 및 선택 단계에서는 공정성과 공평성이 소집단 토의의 주요한 준거로 작용했는데, 이 역시 신문기사에서 강조된 담론과 일치하는 것이었다. 본 연구는 SSI 맥락에서 타당하고 합리적인 판단을 위해 텍스트를 비판적으로 읽을 수 있는 능력을 길러 줄 과학적 소양 교육의 필요성을 함의한다.

Abstract

The research objective of this study is to analyze the aspects of small group decision-making process based on reading news reports in the context of the socio-scientific issues (SSI) activity related to climate change. Twenty-two high school students from Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, were asked to read two news reports on the UN climate change conferences and take a stance on joining the Paris Agreement both as an individual and as a small group. The news reports were analyzed in terms of genre, discourse, and style adapting the critical discourse analysis (CDA) and the decision-making processes of the small groups were examined on recognizing a problem and evaluating alternatives and decisions. The results from analyzing the news reports denoted that the Paris agreement is not only related to finding ideal solutions to climate change, but rather, connected to political or economic interests and power relationship. In the stage of recognizing a problem, meanwhile, different frames which students recognize the Paris agreement and discourses in the foreground of the news reports were the critical causes in terms of identifying the problem. In the stage of evaluating alternatives and decisions, the equity and fairness were the criteria for the small group discussions. This study implies the necessity of the scientific literacy instruction to develop the ability to critical reading in the context of the SSI.

참고문헌 (87)

  1. "The Australian curriculum" (2015)[URL]
  2. Aikenhead, G. S., "Collective decision making in the social context of science", Science Education, 69(4), pp.453~475 (1985)
  3. Bell, A., "The language of news media" (1991), Blackwell
  4. 조용환, "현장연구와 실행연구", 교육인류학연구, 18(4), pp.1~49 (2015), 한국교육인류학회[DOI]
  5. Christensen, C. K., "Young adults’ accounts of scientific knowledge when responding to a television news report of contested science", International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(2), pp.115~145 (2011)
  6. Chinn, C. A., "The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition : A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction", Review of Educational Research, 63(1), pp.1~49 (1993)
  7. Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry & research design : Choosing among five approaches" (2013), Sage
  8. "National curriculum in England:science programmes of study" (2015)[URL]
  9. Eisner, E. W., "The enlightened eye : Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice" (1998), Prentice Hall
  10. Entman, R. M., "Framing : Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm", Journal of Communication, 43(4), pp.51~58 (1993)
  11. "EU “Must be binding on carbon reduction”, Korea, US, and developing countries showed disapproval", Jung-ang Ilbo, ~ (2015)
  12. Fairclough, N., "Discourse and social change" (1992), Polity Press
  13. Fairclough, N., "Media discourse" (1995), E. Arnold
  14. Fairclough, N., "Discourse, social theory, and social research : the discourse of welfare reform", Journal of Socio Linguistics, 4(2), pp.163~195 (2000)
  15. Fairclough, N., "Methods of critical discourse analysis", pp.63~94 (2001), Sage
  16. Fairclough, N., "Analysing discourse : Textual analysis for social research" (2003), Routledge
  17. Fairclough, N., "Discourse as social interaction", pp.258~284 (1997), Sage
  18. Fang, Y. J., "Reporting the same events? A critical analysis of chinese print news media texts", Discourse & Society, 12(5), pp.585~613 (2001)
  19. Fjørtoft, M. R., "The critical element of critical discourse analysis", SYNAPS-A Journal of Professional Communication, 28, pp.67~75 (2013)
  20. Fowler, R., "Language in the news : Discourse and ideology in the press" (1991), Routledge
  21. Grace, M., "Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting", International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), pp.551~570 (2009)
  22. Gruber, H., "Evaluation devices in newspaper reports", Journal of Pragmatics, 19(5), pp.469~486 (1993)
  23. Gwak, Y., "Qualitative research : philosophy, art, and education" (2009), Kyoyukkwahaksa
  24. Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (2004), Hodder Arnold
  25. Hanrahan, M. U., "Engaging with difference in science classrooms : Using CDA to identify interpersonal aspects of inclusive pedagogy", Critical Studies in Education, 46(2), pp.107~127 (2005)
  26. Hanrahan, M. U., "Highlighting hybridity : A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms", Science Education, 90(1), pp.8~43 (2006)
  27. Hansen, A., "Investigating science communication in the age", pp.105~127 (2009), Oxford University Press
  28. Hodson, D., "Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science" (2008), Sense Publishers
  29. Hong, J. L., "Analysis of Korean high school students’decision-making processes in solving a problem involving biological knowledge", Research In Science Education, 34, pp.97~111 (2004)
  30. Hwang, G., "Fairness and justice: Seeking for sustainable growth in Korean society", pp.11~46 (2011), Cho-sun Ilbosa
  31. Climate change 2014 : synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, "IPCC.", IPCC, ~ (2014)
  32. 주영기, "한국 신문의 정치적 성향에 따른 기후변화 뉴스 프레이밍 차이 연구", 언론과학연구, 13(3), pp.591~626 (2013), 한국지역언론학회
  33. Kim, H., "Mapping news frames of major dailies`climate change reports in South Korea", Social Science Studies, 19(2), pp.76~106 (2011)
  34. 김기윤, "지구온난화 논쟁 세계화 속의 과학, 국민국가 그리고 시민사회", 코기토, 68, pp.311~340 (2010), 인문학연구소
  35. Klosterman, M., "Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues", Research in Science Education, 42(1), pp.51~74 (2012)
  36. Kolsto, S. D., "Scientific literacy for citizenship : Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues", Science Education, 85(3), pp.291~310 (2001)
  37. Kolsto, S. D., "‘To trust or not to trust, …’-pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientificissue", International journal of science education, 23(9), pp.877~901 (2001)
  38. Kolsto, S. D., "Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues", Science Education, 90(4), pp.632~655 (2006)
  39. Korean Association for Social Linguistics(KASL), "Social linguistics dictionary" (2012), Sotong
  40. Kress, G., "Communication and culture: An introduction", pp.78~129 (1988), UNSW press
  41. "Largest ever-10 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions", Han-kook Ilbo, ~ (2011)
  42. Teaching and learning science in authoritative classrooms: Teachers’ power and students’ approval in Korean elementary classrooms, "Lee, J. A.", Research in Science Education, 1~27 (2017)
  43. 이신화, "기후변화와 국제정치적 쟁점", 평화연구, 16(2), pp.30~66 (2008), 평화와 민주주의연구소
  44. 이수정, "원자력 발전 관련 사회쟁점에의 비형식적 추론에서 가치 상반된 자료에 대한 대학생들의 응답 유형 분석", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 14(6), pp.147~168 (2014), 학습자중심교과교육학회
  45. 이원표, "신문에서의 새로운 장르, ‘뉴스분석’: 언어 및 담화적 실현과 혼합적 성격", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.129~170 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  46. Lemke, J., "Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice", pp.33~47 (2004), National Science Teachers Association
  47. Lin, S. -S., "Science and non-science undergraduate students’ critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), pp.1021~1046 (2014)
  48. 맹승호, "담화 언어 코드로 본 과학 수업 양태의 학생 중심성", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(1), pp.116~136 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
  49. McClune, B., "Critical reading of science‐based news reports : Establishing a knowledge, skills and attitudes framework", International Journal of Science Education, 32(6), pp.727~752 (2010)
  50. McClune, B., "From aspiration to action : a learning intentions model to promote critical engagement with science in the print-based media", Research in Science Education, 41(5), pp.691~710 (2011)
  51. McClune, B., "Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news : What can we learn from the literature?", Studies in Science Education, 48(1), pp.1~49 (2012)
  52. "Guideline of the paris agreement" (2016)[URL]
  53. Murcia, K., "Science in the news : An evaluation of students’ scientific literacy", Teaching Science, 55(3), pp.40~45 (2009)
  54. National Assembly Research Service(NARS)., "Major contents of the Paris agreement and plan of national assembly" (2016), Gyeong Seongmunhwasa
  55. Next Generation Science Standards Lead State(NGSS), "Next generation science standards : For states, by states" (2013), National Academies Press
  56. Norris, S. P., "University students’interpretation of media reports of science and its relationship to background knowledge, interest, and reading difficulty", Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), pp.123~145 (2003)
  57. OECD., "PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework : Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy" (2016), OECD Publishing
  58. Oreskes, N., "Climate change: What it means for us, our children, and our grandchildren", pp.105~148 (2014), MIT press
  59. Phillips, L. M., "Interpreting popular reports of science : What happens when the reader’s world meets the world on paper?", International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), pp.317~327 (1999)
  60. RAND, "Reading for understanding : Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension" (2002), Rand Corporation
  61. Ratcliffe, M., "Pupil decision‐making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum", International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), pp.167~182 (1997)
  62. Ratcliffie, M., "Science education for citizenship : Teaching socio-scientic i-ssues" (2003), Open university
  63. Rennie, L., "The communication of science and technology : Past, present and future agendas", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.759~773 (2003)
  64. Roberts, D. A., "Handbook of Research on Science Education", pp.729~780 (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  65. Rogers, R., "An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education", pp.1~20 (2011), Routledge
  66. Sadler, T. D., "Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific Issues : A critical review of research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), pp.513~536 (2004)
  67. Sadler, T. D., "Socioscientific argumentation : The effects of content knowledge and morality", International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), pp.1463~1488 (2006)
  68. 신범식, "기후변화의 국제정치와 미-중관계", 국제정치논총, 51(1), pp.127~158 (2011), 한국국제정치학회
  69. Shin, J., "Philosophy of welfare state" (2014), Ingangwa bokji
  70. Strauss, A., "Basics of qualitative research : Grounded theory procedures and techniques" (1990), Sage
  71. Stubbs, M., "Text and corpus analysis : Computer-assisted studies of language and culture" (1996), Blackwell Publishers
  72. "Adoption of the Paris agreement. I: proposal by the president (Draft Decision)" (2015)[URL]
  73. Van Dijk, T. A., "Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media", pp.69~93 (1985), W. de Gruyter
  74. Van Dijk, T. A., "News as discourse" (1986), Longman
  75. Van Dijk, T. A., "Principles of critical discourse analysis", Discourse & Society, 4(2), pp.249~283 (1993)
  76. Van Dijk, T. A., "The handbook of discourse analysis", pp.352~365 (2003), Blackwell
  77. Van Leeuwen, T., "Legitimizing immigration control : A discourse-historical analysis", Discourse Studies, 1(1), pp.83~118 (1999)
  78. Vestergaard, T., "Analyzing professional genres", pp.97~120 (2000), Benjamin
  79. Wodak, R., "Critical discourse analysis at the end of the 20th century", Research in Language and Social Interaction, 32, pp.185~193 (1999)
  80. Wodak, R., "Methods of critical discourse analysis", pp.1~13 (2001), Sage
  81. Wodak, R., "Methods of critical discourse analysis", pp.63~94 (2001), Sage
  82. Wu, Y. T., "High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio‐scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures", International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), pp.371~400 (2011)
  83. Xiao, S., "Associations between attitudes towards science and children’s evaluation of information about socioscientific issues. Contributions from History", Philosophy and Sociology of Science and Mathematics, 26(3), pp.247~269 (2017)
  84. Yoon, P. J., "Fairness and justice: Seeking for sustainable growth in Korean society", pp.89~146 (2011), Cho-sun Ilbosa
  85. Young, R. E., "Critical theory and classroom talk" (1992), Multilingual Matters
  86. Zeidler, D. L., "Socioscientific issues : Theory and practice", Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), pp.49~58 (2009)
  87. Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89, pp.357~377 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

고등학생의 그린 급식 관련 사회 속 과학 쟁점(SSI) 수업에서 나타난 담화 내 특징 및 의사결정 변화 양상 탐색심수연, 최윤희한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2024 · 제52권 제4호중학교 과학 우수아의 자기주도적 협동학습을 강조한 지구온난화 관련 의사결정 학습의 효과고선영, 최승언한국영재학회 · 영재교육연구2013 · 제23권 제4호고등학생들의 논증 텍스트에서 나타나는 기후변화 대응을 위한 기술적 실천에 대한 인식 탐색홍석영한국현장과학교육학회 · 현장과학교육2025 · 제19권 제1호과학기술관련 사회쟁점(SSI)에 대한 고등학생들의 가치 판단과 의사결정 변화 양상 분석김영현, 이은항, 정영란교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2017 · 제21권 제5호과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 수업의 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론에서 나타나는 특징김민환, 김성훈, 남혜인, 노태희한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2018 · 제38권 제2호과학 관련 사회적 쟁점을 다룬 국내 학술 논문에 대한 문헌 연구 - 의사결정을 중심으로 -조헌국교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2014 · 제18권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)

Improving Science Teaching and Learning for New Teachers and Diverse Learners Using Participatory Action Research and Cogenerative DialogueSonya Nichole Martin, 박창미pp. 97-112TIMSS 2015에서 과학 성취도와 흥미에 영향을 주는 교육맥락변인 분석곽영순pp. 113-122왜 과학교사가 되려하는가? -우리나라 예비과학교사들의 교직 선택 동기 -김희경, 이봉우pp. 123-133과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 수업의 소집단 토론과 전체 학급 토론에서 나타나는 특징김민환, 노태희, 김성훈, 남혜인pp. 135-145교사학습공동체를 통한 STEAM 수업 사례 연구정경화, 신영준pp. 147-160
원문 보기