임플랜트 고정체-지대주 연결부의 형태와 직경이 임플랜트의 기계적 실패에 미치는 영향
Effect of morphology and diameter of implant fixture-abutment connection on mechanical failure of implants
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the fixture abutment connection type and diameter on the screw joint stability in external butt joint for 2nd surgery and internal cone connected type implant system for 1st and 2nd surgery using ultimate fracture strength. Materials and Methods: USII system, SSII system and GSII system of Osstem Implant were used. Each system used the fixture with two different diameters and cement-retained abutments, and tungsten carbide / carbon coated abutment screws were used. Disc shaped stainless steel metal tube was attached using resin-based temporary cement. The experimental group was divided into seven subgroups, including the platform switching shaped specimen that uses a regular abutment in the fixture with a wide diameter in USII system. A static load was increased to the metal tube at 5mm deviated point from the implant central axis until it reached the compression bending strength at a rate of 1mm/min. Then the deformations and patterns of fracture in threaded connection were compared. Results and Conclusion: 1. In the comparison between the Regular diameter, compression bending strength of SSII system was higher than USII system and GSII system. There was no significant difference between USII system and GSII system. 2. In the comparison between wide diameter, compression bending strength was increased in the order of GSII system, USII system, and SSII system. 3. In comparison between the implant diameter, compression bending strength of the wide diameter was greater than the regular diameter in any system(P<0.05). 4. There was no significant difference between the platform switching (III group) and the regular diameter (I group) in USII system. 5. In USII system, fracture of abutment screw and deformation of both fixture and abutment were observed in I, II and III subgroups. 6. Failure pattern of SSII system, which was the fracture of abutment screw and deformation of the abutment and fixture, was observed in both IV and V subgroups. Fracture of some fixtures was observed in subgroup V. 7. Failure pattern of GSII system, which was the fracture of the abutment screw and deformation of the fixture and the abutment, was observed in both VI and VII subgroups. Apart from other subgroups, subgroup VII demonstrated no bending neither the fracture at the top of the fixture. The compressive deformation of internal slope in the fixture was the only thing observed in subgroup VII.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of the fixture abutment connection type and diameter on the screw joint stability in external butt joint for 2nd surgery and internal cone connected type implant system for 1st and 2nd surgery using ultimate fracture strength. Materials and Methods: USII system, SSII system and GSII system of Osstem Implant were used. Each system used the fixture with two different diameters and cement-retained abutments, and tungsten carbide / carbon coated abutment screws were used. Disc shaped stainless steel metal tube was attached using resin-based temporary cement. The experimental group was divided into seven subgroups, including the platform switching shaped specimen that uses a regular abutment in the fixture with a wide diameter in USII system. A static load was increased to the metal tube at 5mm deviated point from the implant central axis until it reached the compression bending strength at a rate of 1mm/min. Then the deformations and patterns of fracture in threaded connection were compared. Results and Conclusion: 1. In the comparison between the Regular diameter, compression bending strength of SSII system was higher than USII system and GSII system. There was no significant difference between USII system and GSII system. 2. In the comparison between wide diameter, compression bending strength was increased in the order of GSII system, USII system, and SSII system. 3. In comparison between the implant diameter, compression bending strength of the wide diameter was greater than the regular diameter in any system(P<0.05). 4. There was no significant difference between the platform switching (III group) and the regular diameter (I group) in USII system. 5. In USII system, fracture of abutment screw and deformation of both fixture and abutment were observed in I, II and III subgroups. 6. Failure pattern of SSII system, which was the fracture of abutment screw and deformation of the abutment and fixture, was observed in both IV and V subgroups. Fracture of some fixtures was observed in subgroup V. 7. Failure pattern of GSII system, which was the fracture of the abutment screw and deformation of the fixture and the abutment, was observed in both VI and VII subgroups. Apart from other subgroups, subgroup VII demonstrated no bending neither the fracture at the top of the fixture. The compressive deformation of internal slope in the fixture was the only thing observed in subgroup VII.
참고문헌 (36)
- Khraisat A, "Stability of implant-abutment interface with a hexagon-mediated butt joint : failure mode and bending resistance", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 7, pp.221~228 (2005)
- Goodacre C, "Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.537~552 (1999)
- McGlumphy EA, "Implant Screw Mechanics", Dent Clinics North Am, 42, pp.71~89 (1998)
- Haas R, "Brånemark single tooth implants : A preliminary report of 76 implants", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.274~279 (1995)
- Jörnéus L, "Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.353~359 (1992)
- Jaarda MJ, "Comparison of"Look-Alike"implant prosthetic retaining screws", J Prosthodont, 4, pp.23~27 (1995)
- Binon PP, "The role of screws in implant systems", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9(suppl), pp.48~63 (1994)
- Rangert B, "Forces and moments on Br?nemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Patterson EA, "Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.26~33 (1992)
- Sakaguchi RL, "Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.295~302 (1995)
- Burguete RL, "Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.592~599 (1994)
- Schwarz MS, "Mechanical complications of dental implants", Clin Oral Impl Res, 11(Suppl), pp.156~158 (2000)
- Binon PP, "Implants and components : Entering the new millennium", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.76~94 (2000)
- Merz BR, "Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection. An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.519~526 (2000)
- Haack JE, "Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.529~536 (1995)
- 최진욱, "임플랜트 지대주 나사의 텅스텐 카바이드", 탄소 코팅이 전하중에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 2006, pp.44(2), 229~242[DOI]
- February 1987, "Suggested tightening torques for structural bolts. Fastener Technology", pp.1987, Griffith HT.
- Wilson TG, "Fundamentals of periodontics", pp.582~ (2003), Quintessence
- Persson LG, "Bacterial colonization on internal surface of Br?nemark system implant components", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.90~95 (1996)
- Scarano A, "A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments", J Oral Implantol, 31, pp.269~275 (2005)
- King GN, "Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone levels in non-submerged dental implants : a radiographic study in the canine mandible", J Periodontol, 73, pp.1111~1117 (2002)
- Dibart S, "In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal : the locking taper system", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.732~737 (2005)
- Degidi M, "Carinci F : Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants : A retrospective study of 510 implants", J Periodontol, 79, pp.49~ (2008)
- Langer B, "The wide fixture: A solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.400~ (1993)
- Lazzara RJ, "Platform switching : A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 26, pp.9~17 (2006)
- Prosper L, "A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24, pp.299~308 (2009)
- Berglundh T, "The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.81~90 (1991)
- Abrahamsson I, "The periimplant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.212~219 (1996)
- Tarnow DP, "The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of interimplant bone crest", J Periodontol, 71, pp.546~549 (2000)
- Hobkirk JA, "Mandibular deformation in subjects with osseointegrated implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.319~328 (1991)
- Rangert B, "Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.360~370 (1997)
- Hoyer SA, "Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface : Joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.599~607 (2001)
- Gratton DG, "Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant", abutment interface, 2001, pp.85, 47~52
- Misch SE, "Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry, part II", Implant Dent, 13, pp.310~321 (2004)
- Maeda Y, "Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: Is there any biomechanical retionale?", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.581~584 (2007)
- Pessoa RS, "Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols : Computed tomographybased three-dimensional finite element analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.911~919 (2010)