조임회전력이 임플랜트-지대주 나사 연결부의 안정성에 미치는 영향
Influence of Tightening Torque on Implant-Abutment Screw Joint Stability
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구목적: 임플랜트 치료에서 가장 흔히 발생하는 기계적 문제점 중 하나는 나사의 풀림이다. 지대주 나사에 조임회전력을 가하는 목 적은 나사를 신장시켜, 신장된 나사의 인장력에 의한 지대주와 고정체간의 압축력을 통해 연결부의 안정성을 부여하는 데 있다. 조임 회전력의 결과로 나타나는 전하중의 크기는 다양한 요소에 의해 영향을 받기 때문에, 동일한 조임회전력을 적용하였다 할지라도 임플 랜트 시스템의 종류에 따라 전하중의 크기가 달라질 수 있다. 따라서 지대주 나사 연결부의 안정성을 위한 다양한 임플랜트 시스템의 적정 조임회전력 크기에 관한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 external butt joint와 두 가지 internal cone 연결형태를 갖는 임플랜트 시스템들에서 지대주 나사의 조임회전력이 임플랜 트-지대주 나사 연결부의 안정성에 미치는 영향을 하중 전후의 풀림회전력 측정을 통해 알아보고자 하였다. 연구재료 및 방법: External butt joint 형태를 가지는 US II 시스템과 8internal cone 연결형태의 SS II 및 11internal cone 연결형태의 GS II 시스템에서 20 Ncm, 30 Ncm, 그리고 40 Ncm의 각기 다른 조임회전력을 적용한 후 초기 풀림회전력 및 상실률과 105회의 반복하중 후 의 풀림회전력 및 상실률을 비교 분석하였다. 연구결과 및 결론: 1. 초기 풀림회전력과 하중 후 풀림회전력은 조임회전력의 크기가 증가할수록 크게 나타났다 (P < .05). 2. 초기 풀림회전력 상실률은 SS II 시스템에서는 조임회전력 크기에 따른 차이가 없었으나 (P > .05), GS II와 US II에서는 20 Ncm 보다 40Ncm의 조임회전력에서 더 낮게 나타났다 (P < .05). 3. 하중 후 풀림회전력 상실률은 세 시스템 모두 30 Ncm의 조임회전력을 가했을 때 가장 낮게 나타났다 (P < .05). 4. 하중 후 풀림회전력 상실률은 SS II, GS II, 그리고 US II 순으로 높아지는 경향을 보였다. 5. 초기 풀림회전력과 하중 후 풀림회전력 상실률 간에는 상관관계가 없었다 (P > .05). 이상의 결과로부터 임플랜트 시스템의 종류뿐만 아니라 조임회전력의 크기 또한 지대주 나사의 풀림회전력 상실에 영향을 준다는 것 을 알 수 있다. 따라서 임플랜트-지대주 나사 연결부 안정성 유지를 위해서는 임플랜트 시스템마다 적정 조임회전력이 제시되어야 하 고, 또한 임상에서 이를 준수하는 것이 매우 중요하다고 생각된다.
Abstract
Statement of problem: Within the elastic limit of the screw, the greater the preload, the tighter and more secure the screw joint. However, additional tensile forces can incur plastic deformation of the abutment screw when functional loads are superimposed on preload stresses, and they can elicit the loosening or fracture of the abutment screw. Therefore, it is necessary to find the optimum preload that will maximize fatigue life and simultaneously offer a reasonable degree of protection against loosening. Another critical factor in addition to the applied torque which can affect the amount of preload is the joint connection type between implant and abutment. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tightening torque on the implant-abutment screw joint stability. Material and methods: Respectively, three different amount of tightening torque (20, 30, and 40 Ncm) were applied to implant systems with three different joint connections, one external butt joint and two internal cones. The initial removal torque value and the postload (cyclic loading up to 100,000 cycles) removal torque value of the abutment screw were measured with digital torque gauge. Then rate of the initial and the postload removal torque loss were calculated for the comparison of the effect of tightening torques and joint connection types between implant and abutment on the joint stability. Results and conclusion: 1. Increase in tightening torque value resulted in significant increase in initial and postload removal torque value in all implant systems (P < .05). 2. Initial removal torque loss rates in SS II system were not significantly different when three different tightening torque values were applied (P > .05), however GS II and US II systems exhibited significantly lower loss rates with 40 Ncm torque value than with 20 Ncm (P < .05). 3. In all implant systems, postload removal torque loss rates were lowest when the torque value of 30 Ncm was applied (P < .05). 4. Postload removal torque loss rates tended to increase in order of SS II, GS II and US II system. 5. There was no correlation between initial removal torque value and postload removal torque loss rate (P > .05).
참고문헌 (48)
- Adell R., "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Albrektsson T., "A multicenter report on osseointegration oral implants", J Prosthet Dent, 60, pp.75~84 (1988)
- Johansson G., "Complications, supplementary treatment, and maintenance in edentulous arches with implant- supported fixed prostheses", Int J Prosthodont, 3, pp.89~92 (1990)
- Tolman DE., "Tissue-integrated prosthesis complications", Int J Oral maxillofac implants, 7, pp.477~484 (1992)
- Carlson B., "Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.90~94 (1994)
- Hemmings KW., "Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a 5-year report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.191~196 (1994)
- Jemt T., "A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment", J Dent, 21, pp.203~208 (1993)
- Jorneus L., "Loads and designs of screw joints for single crowns supported by osseointegrated implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.353~359 (1992)
- Misch CE., "Principles for screw-retained prostheses. in: Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed.", pp.575~593 (1999), Missouri: CV Mosby
- Bickford JH., "An Introduction to the Design and Behavior of Bolted Joints", pp.515~564 (1995), New York Marcel Dekker
- Sakaguchi RL., "External strain distribution on implant prosthetic components", J Dent Res, 73, pp.232~ (1994)
- McGlumphy EA., "Implant Screw Mechanics", Dent Clinics North Am, 42, pp.71~89 (1998)
- Rangert B., "Forces and moments on Branemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Burguete RL., "Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.592~599 (1994)
- Haack JE., "Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.529~536 (1995)
- Murat C., "Accuracy of a manual torque application device for morse-taper implants: a technical note", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.743~748 (2004)
- Griffith HT., "Suggested tightening torques for structural bolts", Fastener Technology (1987)
- Lang L.A., "Finite element analysis to determine implant preload", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.539~546 (2003)
- Jaarda MJ., "Gratton DG. Comparison of “look-alike”implant prosthetic retaining screws", J Prosthodont, 4, pp.23~27 (1995)
- Binon P., "The role of screws in implant systems", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.48~ (1994)
- Gibb CH., "Limits of human bite strength", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.226~229 (1986)
- Khraisat A., "Fatigue resistance of two implant", abutment joint designs, 2002, pp.88, 604~610
- Tan KB., "Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 16, pp.367~377 (2001)
- Lazzara RJ., "Criteria for implant selection: surgical and prosthetic consideration", Pract Perio Aesthet Dent, 6, pp.55~62 (1994)
- Binon P., "Screw joints, components, and other intimate relationships", J Prosthet Dent, 72, pp.625~ (1994)
- Cavazos E., "Preventing loosening of implant abutment screws", J Prosthet Dent, 75, pp.566~569 (1996)
- Cibirka RM., "Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.268~275 (2001)
- Mengel R., "An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different insturments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 13, pp.91~96 (1998)
- Helsingen A., "Comparative stress analysis and clinical performance studies of Branemark implants and related clones", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.422~430 (1994)
- Shigley JE., "Standard Handbook of Machine Designs" (1986), McGraw-Hill
- Cantwell A., "Preload loss in gold prosthesis-re-taining screws as a function of time", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.124~132 (2004)
- Siamos G., "The relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implantsupported restorations", J Oral Implantol, 28, pp.67~73 (2002)
- Merz BR., "Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection : an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.519~526 (2000)
- Schwarz MS., "Mechanical complications of dental implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 11, pp.156~158 (2000)
- Binon PP., "Implants and components: Entering the new millennium", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.76~94 (2000)
- Sakaguchi RL., "Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental mplant screws", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.295~302 (1995)
- Patterson EA., "Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.26~33 (1992)
- Rangert B., "Forces and moments on Branemark implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant, 4, pp.241~247 (1989)
- Balfour A., "Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments", J Prosthet Dent, 73, pp.36~43 (1995)
- Norton MR., "An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 8, pp.290~298 (1997)
- Chee W., "Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: which is better?", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.137~141 (1999)
- Levine RA., "Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 ro more years", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.516~520 (1999)
- Sutter F., "The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: Design and engineering", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 13, pp.409~443 (1993)
- Gratton DG., "Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.47~52 (2001)
- Faulkner MG., "Measuring abutment", implant joint integrity with the Periotest instrument, 1999, pp.14, 681~688
- Sin HC., "About the coefficient of friction", J KSTLE, 4, pp.29~41 (1986)
- 최진욱, "임플랜트 지대주 나사의 텅스텐 카바이드", 탄소 코팅이 전하중에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 2006, pp.44(2), 229~242[DOI]
- International Organization for Standardi, "ISO", DIS 14801 Dental implants - Dynamic continuous fatigue test, 2001