절삭가공과 적층가공으로 제작한 임시수복물의 두께에 따른 굴곡강도 비교
Comparison of flexural strength according to thickness between provisional restorations fabricated by subtractive and additive manufacturing
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare flexural strength according to the thickness of provisional restoration materials manufactured by subtractive and additive methods using CAD-CAM system. Materials and methods : It was divided into three groups with different manufacturing methods, the CON group manufactured by the traditional method, the MIL group manufactured by subtractive methods and the DLP group manufactured by additive methods. Each group was divided into 3 groups by varying the thickness of the specimen (1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm), and a total of 9 experimental groups were set. Fifteen specimens for each group were prepared in the form of a bar and the flexural strength was measured. Results : According to the manufacturing method, the MIL group showed the highest flexural strength, followed by the DLP group and the CON group(p<0.01). In the MIL and DLP groups, the flexural strength increased statistically significantly as the thickness increased (p<0.01), but in the CON group, there was no statistically significant difference in the flexural strength at 1.5 mm thickness and 2.0 mm thickness(p>0.05). Conclusion : Provisional restorative resins fabricated by subtractive methods showed higher flexural strength than those made by additive manufacturing, and both showed superior flexural strength than those fabricated by traditional methods. Active use of the CAD-CAM system in the dental field is recommended, however, as the flexural strength decreases statistically as the thickness of the material decreases, we need to be careful about reduction in the thickness of the material.
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare flexural strength according to the thickness of provisional restoration materials manufactured by subtractive and additive methods using CAD-CAM system. Materials and methods : It was divided into three groups with different manufacturing methods, the CON group manufactured by the traditional method, the MIL group manufactured by subtractive methods and the DLP group manufactured by additive methods. Each group was divided into 3 groups by varying the thickness of the specimen (1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm), and a total of 9 experimental groups were set. Fifteen specimens for each group were prepared in the form of a bar and the flexural strength was measured. Results : According to the manufacturing method, the MIL group showed the highest flexural strength, followed by the DLP group and the CON group(p<0.01). In the MIL and DLP groups, the flexural strength increased statistically significantly as the thickness increased (p<0.01), but in the CON group, there was no statistically significant difference in the flexural strength at 1.5 mm thickness and 2.0 mm thickness(p>0.05). Conclusion : Provisional restorative resins fabricated by subtractive methods showed higher flexural strength than those made by additive manufacturing, and both showed superior flexural strength than those fabricated by traditional methods. Active use of the CAD-CAM system in the dental field is recommended, however, as the flexural strength decreases statistically as the thickness of the material decreases, we need to be careful about reduction in the thickness of the material.
참고문헌 (27)
- Singh A, "Comparative Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Provisional Crown and Bridge Materials-An Invitro Study", J Clin Diagn Res, 10(8), pp.ZC72~77 (2016)
- Burns DR, "A review of selected dental literature on contemporary provisional fixed prosthodontic treatment : report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics", J Prosthet Dent, 90(5), pp.474~497 (2003)
- Haselton DR, "Flexural strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins", J Prosthet Dent, 87(2), pp.225~228 (2002)
- Hamza TA, "The effect of fiber reinforcement on the fracture toughness and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins", J Prosthet Dent, 91(3), pp.258~264 (2004)
- Syed M, "Allergic Reactions to Dental Materials-A Systematic Review", J Clin Diagn Res, 9(10), pp.ZE04~09 (2015)
- Arora A, "Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of copings fabricated from three different fabrication techniques : An in vitro study", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 18(2), pp.102~107 (2018)
- Abdullah AO, "Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD", CAM vs conventional provisional crowns, 2016, pp.24(3), 258~263
- Park ME, "Three-dimensional comparative study on the accuracy and reproducibility of dental casts fabricated by 3D printers", J Prosthet Dent, 119(5), pp.861~ (2018)[DOI]
- Sun J, "The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics", J Prosthodont, 21(8), pp.641~644 (2012)
- Kim SB, "Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography", J Prosthet Dent, 120(5), pp.693~698 (2018)
- Liu Q, "Rapid prototyping in dentistry : technology and application", Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 29, pp.317~335 (2006)
- Stansbury JW, "3D printing with polymers : Challenges among expanding options and opportunities", Dent Mater, 32(1), pp.54~64 (2016)
- Alharbi N, "Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology", Int J Prosthodont, 29(5), pp.503~510 (2016)
- Elsaka SE, "Bond strength of novel CAD", CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement : the effect of surface treatments, 2014, pp.16(6), 531~540
- 임재훈, "표면연마와 제작방법에 따른 임시 수복용 레진의 굽힘강도에 관한 연구", 구강회복응용과학지, 37(1), pp.16~22 (2021), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- 조원탁, "제작방법에 따른 임시 수복용 레진의 파절강도 및 굴곡강도에 관한 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 57(3), pp.225~231 (2019), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Yao J, "Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD", CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling, 2014, pp.112(3), 649~657
- Kim CM, "Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs", J Prosthet Dent, 115(5), pp.624~629 (2016)
- Tanapon Reeponmaha, "Comparison of fracture strength after thermo-mechanical aging between provisional crowns made with CAD", CAM and conventional method, 2020, pp.12(4), 218~224[DOI]
- Chadwick RG, "Thermocycling-the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins", J Oral Rehabil, 21(5), pp.533~543 (1994)
- Revilla-Leon M, "A review on chemical composition, mechanical properties, and manufacturing work flow of additively manufactured current polymers for interim dental restorations", J Esthet Restor Dent, 31(1), pp.51~57 (2019)
- 박서진, "다양한 조성의 3D 프린팅 임시치관용 레진의 물성 비교", 대한치과재료학회지, 46(3), pp.139~152 (2019), 대한치과재료학회[DOI]
- Xu HH, "Three-body wear of dental resin composites reinforced with silica-fused whiskers", J Dent Mater, 20(3), pp.220~227 (2004)
- 정승진, "다양한 CAD", CAM 방식으로 제작한 금속하부구조물 간의 변연 및 내면 적합도 비교 연구, 2019, pp.57(3), 211~218[DOI]
- Berger U, "Aspects of accuracy and precision in the additive manufacturing of plastic gears", J Virtual Phys Prototype, 10(2), pp.49~57 (2015)
- 원선, "치과용 재료의 적층가공에 대한 문헌고찰", 구강회복응용과학지, 37(1), pp.1~15 (2021), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- 이동형, "Comparison of flexural strength according to thickness between CAD", CAM denture base resins and conventional denture base resins, 2020, pp.36(3), 183~195[DOI]