제작방법에 따른 임시 수복용 레진의 파절강도 및 굴곡강도에 관한 연구
Comparison analysis of fracture load and flexural strength of porvisional restorative resins fabricated by diferent methods
1
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적: 본 연구의 목적은 적층 가공법, 절삭 가공법 및 직접법에 의해 제작된 임시 수복용 레진의 파절강도와 굴곡강도를 비교하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 각각 다른 방법들로 제작된 5가지 방법의 임시 수복용 레진을 조사하였다: Stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D 프린터를 이용한 적층가공법(S3Z군), 두 가지 digital light processing (DLP) 3D 프린터를 이용한 적층 가공법(D3Z군, D3P군), 절삭 가공법(MIL군), 전통적인 방식의 직접법(CON군). 파절강도 시험은 각 방법을 이용하여 소구치 형태의 시편을 준비하였고, 굴곡강도 시험은 각 방법을 이용하여 직사각형의 바 형태의 시편 (25 × 2 × 2 mm)을 준비하여 universal testing machine (UTM)을 사용하여 평가하였다. 결과: 적층 가공을 이용해 제작된 S3Z군, D3Z군, D3P군의 파절강도는 MIL군 및 CON군의 파절강도와 유의한 차이가 없었다 (P > .05/10 = .005). 한편, S3Z군, D3P군, MIL군의 굴곡강도는 CON군의 굴곡강도보다 높았으나 (P < .05), D3Z군의 굴곡강도는 CON군보다 낮았다 (P < .05). 결론: 본 연구의 한계 내에서 적층 가공법으로 제작된 임시 수복용 레진은 절삭 가공법과 기존에 사용되었던 직접법에 의해 제작된 임시수복용 레진과 임상적으로 유사한 파절강도, 굴곡강도를 나타냈다.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was undertaken to compare fracture and flexural strength of provisional restorative resins fabricated by additive manufacturing, subtractive manufacturing, and conventional direct technique. Materials and methods: Five types of provisional restorative resin made with different methods were investigated: Stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printer (S3Z), two digital light processing (DLP) 3D printer (D3Z, D3P), milling method (MIL), conventional method (CON). For fracture strength test, premolar shaped specimens were prepared by each method and stored in distilled water at 37캜 for 24 hours. Compressive load was measured using a universal testing machine (UTM). For flexural strength test, rectangular bar specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) were prepared by each method according to ISO 10477 and flexural strength was measured by UTM. Results: Fracture strengths of the S3Z, D3Z, and D3P groups fabricated by additive manufacturing were not significantly different from those of MIL and CON groups (P > .05/10 = .005). On the other hand, the flexural strengths of S3Z, D3P, and MIL groups were significantly higher than that of CON group (P < .05), but the flexural strength of D3Z group was significantly lower than that of CON group (P < .05). Conclusion: Within the limitation of our study, provisional restorative resins made from additive manufacturing showed clinically comparable fracture and flexural strength as those made by subtractive manufacturing and conventional method.
참고문헌 (22)
- 박진서, "시효처리가 폴리머 임시수복물 재료의 굽힘특성에 미치는 영향", 대한치과재료학회지, 40(3), pp.215~221 (2013), 대한치과재료학회
- Shillingburg HT Jr, "Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics", pp.225~227 (1997), Quintessence Publishing Co
- Song KY, "Marginal adaptation of new provisional materials for fixed prosthodontics", J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci, 13, pp.247~255 (1997)
- 송은성, "치과용 CAD", CAM 밀링기에 대한 치과의료종사자들의 선호도 조사, 2018, pp.56(3), 188~198[DOI]
- DeLong R, "Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches", J Dent Res, 82, pp.438~442 (2003)
- Fuster-Torres MA, "CAD", CAM dental systems in implant dentistry : update, 2009, pp.14, E141~E145
- 이상호, "의료 3D 프린팅 기술의 전망 및 소아치과분야에서의 활용", 대한소아치과학회지, 43(1), pp.93~108 (2016), 대한소아치과학회[DOI]
- Hazeveld A, "Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.108~115 (2014)
- Isil Karaokutan, "In vitro study of fracture strength of provisional crown materials", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 7(1), pp.27~31 (2015), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Alt V, "Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures : CAD", CAM versus directly fabricated restorations, 2011, pp.27, 339~347
- Nejatidanesh F, "Flexural strength of interim resin materials for fixed prosthodontics", J Prosthodont, 18, pp.507~511 (2009)
- Mehrpour H, "Evaluation of the flexural strength of interim restorative materials in fixed prosthodontics", J Dent (Shiraz), 17, pp.201~206 (2016)
- 서덕규, "광중합형 레진의 3점 굴곡 강도와 이축 굴곡 강도 측정 방법에 대한 상대적 신뢰도의 비교", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 31(1), pp.58~65 (2006), 대한치과보존학회
- Mörmann WH, "Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays", Quintessence Int, 20, pp.329~339 (1989)
- Alharbi N, "Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.760~767 (2016)
- Tahayeri A, "3D printed versus conventionally cured provisional crown and bridge dental materials", Dent Mater, 34, pp.192~200 (2018)
- Matsumura H, "Three-body wear of four types of light-activated composite resin veneering materials", Quintessence Int, 25, pp.425~430 (1994)
- Peutzfeldt A, "Resin composites in dentistry : the monomer systems", Eur J Oral Sci, 105, pp.97~116 (1997)
- Weaver RE, "Reactions to acrylic resin dental prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 43, pp.138~142 (1980)
- Mair LH, "Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop", J Dent, 24, pp.141~148 (1996)
- Chadwick RG, "Thermocycling--the effects upon the compressive strength and abrasion resistance of three composite resins", J Oral Rehabil, 21, pp.533~543 (1994)
- 박상모, "3D 프린팅으로 제작된 여러 종류의 레진브릿지의 굴곡강도에 대한 연구", 구강회복응용과학지, 33(4), pp.260~268 (2017), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]