毛澤東과 新中國 역사 재평가의 정치성 ― 錢理群의『毛澤東時代與後毛澤東時代: 另一種歷史書寫』사례를 중심으로
A Politics of historical reassessment of Mao Zedong and New China
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study intends to raise a problem regarding politicalcharacter of historical reassessment about 60 years of the People’sRepublic of China and Mao Zedong, which is being made by asection of the intellectual world. To this end, the author analyzedpolitical character of Mao Zedong era and post Mao Zedong era: AnAlternative Writting of History (챘씼?븈덜휽遜챘씼?븈덜: 쥼寧텻쉡袈뺱뙌) by Qian Liqun in China, which shows very interestingperspective in regards to such historical reassessment. For analysisof political character, the author applied Frame Theory of GeorgeLakoff. As the result, the author reached the conclusion that QianLiqun is conducting historical reassessment on history of socialismChina and Mao Zedong under liberalism frame which can besummarized as ‘The Power vs The Intellectuals’. Based on theconclusion, the study suggested that it is necessary to reassessQian Liqun as a thinker who has very conservative and liberalview, differently from existing generalized assessment.
Abstract
This study intends to raise a problem regarding politicalcharacter of historical reassessment about 60 years of the People’sRepublic of China and Mao Zedong, which is being made by asection of the intellectual world. To this end, the author analyzedpolitical character of Mao Zedong era and post Mao Zedong era: AnAlternative Writting of History (챘씼?븈덜휽遜챘씼?븈덜: 쥼寧텻쉡袈뺱뙌) by Qian Liqun in China, which shows very interestingperspective in regards to such historical reassessment. For analysisof political character, the author applied Frame Theory of GeorgeLakoff. As the result, the author reached the conclusion that QianLiqun is conducting historical reassessment on history of socialismChina and Mao Zedong under liberalism frame which can besummarized as ‘The Power vs The Intellectuals’. Based on theconclusion, the study suggested that it is necessary to reassessQian Liqun as a thinker who has very conservative and liberalview, differently from existing generalized assessment.
참고문헌 (26)
- 毛澤東, "毛澤東全集(5冊)" (1977), 人民出版社
- 毛澤東, "毛澤東文集(全8卷)" (1999), 人民出版社
- 中共中央黨校黨史敎硏室, "中共黨史參考資料(8冊)" (1980), 人民出版社
- 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選(2冊)" (1983), 人民出版社
- 중국공산당 중앙문헌연구실, "정통 중국현대사" (1990), 사계절
- 邱石, "解放文選" (1998), 經濟日報出版社
- 錢理群, "내 정신의 자서전" (2012), 글항아리
- 錢理群, "망각을 거부하라" (2012), 그린비출판사
- 錢理群, "모택동 시대와 포스트 모택동 시대 1949-2009" (2012), 한울아카데미
- 沈志華, "思考與選擇 : 從知識分子會議到反右運動" (2008), 中文大學
- 潘維主, "中國模式 : 讀解人民共和國60年" (2009), 中央編譯出版社
- 죠지 레이코프, "프레임 전쟁" (2007), 창비
- 이동훈, "프레임은 어떻게 사회를 움직이는가" (2012), 삼성경제연구소
- 鄭永年, "毛澤東'民主新路'及其現代性困境", 東亞論文, (69)
- "回顧2010年"[URL]
- 鈴木將久, "‘57體制’的啓示", 臺灣社會硏究, (86) (2013)
- 胡繩, "毛澤東的新民主主義論再評價", 中共黨史研究, (3) (1999)
- "建國以來最大錯誤是抗美援朝"[URL]
- 류준필, "困惑과 悖論 : 첸리췬(錢理群)의 ‘중국 사회주의 인식’에 대하여", 한국학연구, (27), pp.179~199 (2012), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 백승욱, "‘역사적 중간물’ 또는 ‘모로 서기’의 고독함과 곤란함: 錢理群선생에 대한 토론", 한국중국현대문학학회 2012년 춘계학술대회 자료집 (2012)
- 백승욱, "중국 지식인은 ‘중국 굴기’를 어떻게 말하는가", 황해문화, (가을) (2011)
- 성근제, "중국은 어디로 가는가?", 역사비평, (97), pp.258~291 (2011), 역사문제연구소
- 성근제, "文革과 啓蒙", 중국어문학논집, (53), pp.267~286 (2008), 중국어문학연구회
- 왕후이, "충칭사건 : 밀실정치와 신자유주의의 권토중래", 역사비평, (99) (2012)
- 이욱연, "중국 비판적 지식인 사회의 새로운 분화: 첸리췬과 왕후이의 경우", 동아연구, 32(1), pp.73~103 (2013), 동아연구소
- 이홍규, "보시라이 숙청과 충칭모델의 미래", 현대중국연구, 14(1), pp.37~82 (2012), 현대중국학회[DOI]