본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

건국 초 지식인 상황에 대한 소고

A Study on the Intellectuals’ Conditions at the Beginning of the Foundation of China

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper is to study on the Party's policy towards intellectuals and the intellectuals' responses of that from the beginning of the foundation to the Anti-Rightist Campaign. For it, this paper firstly is to research into the development process of the Party's policy towards intellectuals, and then is to research into what is the logic of thought reform, and lastly is to research into how the intellectuals responded to the Party's policy. The Party's policy towards intellectuals is supposed to be divided into three periods- the period of Ideological remolding movement, the period of Campaign against academic ideology and the movement for suppressing counter-revolutionaries, the period of the “two hundreds” and the “airing of views” policy. The ideological ground of thought reform is Mao Zedong's thought in the Yan-an days. He asserted that theory should be integrated with practice. The Party encouraged the intellectuals to begin with patriotic ideology and to aim to get proletarian ideology, that is the process of thought reform. The logic such as that is due to the Chinese special social structure that have low rate of workers' population. Actually, thought reform is to force the intellectuals to accept the Mao Zedong's thought and deny individualism and liberalism that the intellectuals widely shared in that time. Why did the intellectuals accept the thought reform of CCP? I think it is because they had understanded the position of people through contact with them and then they denied their past experiences and accepted theories of class. But the theories of class they had accepted were vulgarly applicated to various problems and the intellectuals at last no longer could have been intellectuals. It was the period of the “two hundred” and the “airing of views” policy that the intellectuals claimed their opinions of the communism in China. Above all, they intensively insisted the problems of relations of party and intellectuals, that is substantially the problem of academic freedom. Besides, they insist that Marxism is not the only correct theory and so the bourgoisie theory should be allowed to study and educate, the talks at the Yan'an forum of literature and art has significance only in the specific time. That was the challenge to two kinds of ideological authority. Furthermore, they insist the value of democracy and the rule of law in socialism. Since the period of reform and open, some of these issues have accepted by the Party and some of them have been instantly the social issues in thinking and academic fields.

Abstract

This paper is to study on the Party's policy towards intellectuals and the intellectuals' responses of that from the beginning of the foundation to the Anti-Rightist Campaign. For it, this paper firstly is to research into the development process of the Party's policy towards intellectuals, and then is to research into what is the logic of thought reform, and lastly is to research into how the intellectuals responded to the Party's policy. The Party's policy towards intellectuals is supposed to be divided into three periods- the period of Ideological remolding movement, the period of Campaign against academic ideology and the movement for suppressing counter-revolutionaries, the period of the “two hundreds” and the “airing of views” policy. The ideological ground of thought reform is Mao Zedong's thought in the Yan-an days. He asserted that theory should be integrated with practice. The Party encouraged the intellectuals to begin with patriotic ideology and to aim to get proletarian ideology, that is the process of thought reform. The logic such as that is due to the Chinese special social structure that have low rate of workers' population. Actually, thought reform is to force the intellectuals to accept the Mao Zedong's thought and deny individualism and liberalism that the intellectuals widely shared in that time. Why did the intellectuals accept the thought reform of CCP? I think it is because they had understanded the position of people through contact with them and then they denied their past experiences and accepted theories of class. But the theories of class they had accepted were vulgarly applicated to various problems and the intellectuals at last no longer could have been intellectuals. It was the period of the “two hundred” and the “airing of views” policy that the intellectuals claimed their opinions of the communism in China. Above all, they intensively insisted the problems of relations of party and intellectuals, that is substantially the problem of academic freedom. Besides, they insist that Marxism is not the only correct theory and so the bourgoisie theory should be allowed to study and educate, the talks at the Yan'an forum of literature and art has significance only in the specific time. That was the challenge to two kinds of ideological authority. Furthermore, they insist the value of democracy and the rule of law in socialism. Since the period of reform and open, some of these issues have accepted by the Party and some of them have been instantly the social issues in thinking and academic fields.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 于風政, "改造: 1949~1957年的知識分子" (2001), 河南人民
  2. 北京师范大学中文系现代文学教学改革小组, "中国现代文学史参考资料(第三卷) ―社会主义革命和建设时期的文学(1949~1958)" (1959), 高等教育出版社
  3. "周恩来 刘少奇 朱德 邓小平 陈云 著作选读" (1987), 人民出版社
  4. "毛泽东选集(第2, 3卷)" (1991), 人民出版社
  5. 金冲及, "转折年代-中国的1947年" (2002), 三联书店
  6. 傅国涌, "1949年:中国知识分子的私人记录" (2005), 长江文艺
  7. 이택후, "중국현대사상사의 굴절" (1992), 지식산업사
  8. 章詒和, "最後的貴族" (2004), 牛津大學
  9. 章清, "“胡适派学人群”与现代中国自由主义" (2004), 上海古籍
  10. 钱理群, "1948:天地玄黄" (1993), 山東敎育
  11. 鄭也夫, "知識分子硏究" (2004), 中國靑年出版社
  12. 許紀霖, "中國知識分子十論" (2003), 復旦大學
  13. 許紀霖, "二十世紀中國知識分子史論" (2005), 新星
  14. 马克, "革命中的道路:延安道路" (2002), 社会科学文献出版社
  15. 모리스 마이스너, "마오의 중국과 그 이후 1,2" (2004), 이산
  16. 김시준, "중국당대문예사조사연구:1949~1993" (2001), 서울대출판부
  17. 竹內實, "中國近現代論爭年表 下(1949~1989)" (1992), 京都大學人文硏究所硏究報告
  18. 黄平, "殊途同归乎?-近现代知识分子现象透视", 中国社会科学季刊(香港), (4) (1993)
  19. 黄平, "当代大陆中国知识分子的非知识分子化", 二十一世纪(香港), (28) (1995)
  20. 黎之, "回忆与思考-整风⋅鸣放⋅反右", 新文学史料, (1) (1995)
  21. 谢涛, "1990年代以来关于建国初知识分子思想改造运动研究述评", 党史研究与教学, (168) (2002)
  22. 李丹, "建国初期中国共产党的知识分子政策述评", 党史文苑 (2005)
  23. 李德顺, "“知识分子”新概念", 人文杂志, (1) (1997)
  24. 刘仓, "新中国成立初期的胡适思想批判运动", 党史博览, (3) (2009)
  25. 孙丹, "建国初期知识分子思想改造运动研究述评", 当代中国史研究, 15(3) (2009)
  26. 孙玉凡, "从“百花齐放、百家争鸣”到“鸣放”的历史考察", 齐鲁学刊, (212) (2009)
  27. 이주노, "정치권력과 문화권력의 비틀린 만남―‘丁⋅陳反黨小集團’에서 ‘馮雪峰反黨分子’까지", 중국인문학회 2005년 춘계학술대회 발표논문집 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)