재중 아나키스트 독립운동가 이달의 중국현대문학 비평
Anarchist Lee Dal’s Criticism on Modern Chinese Literature
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The anarchist and anti-Japanese soldier, Lee Dal(1910-1942) who was the member of the South China Korean Youth League and the Korean volunteer corps, wrote many articles for Chinese and Korean publications. His most noted works were critiques about modern Chinese literature on Korean publications from Jan. 1935 to the Spring of 1936. Focusing on Ba Jin’s collection of short stories, Revenge, he wrote a critique about Ba Jin(巴金)’s attitude of writing. Instead of emphasizing the noble sacrifices made in war, Lee Dal pursued human justice and humanity beyond the narrow scope of nationalism or distorted patriotism. He had high regards for Guo Mo-ruo(郭沫若)’s rebellious spirit as an enlightening light and indomitable spirit in dark times. But he criticized severely Mao Dun(茅盾)’s trilogy, Disillusionment, Disturbance, Persuit. He claimed that Mao Dun’s writings sowed seeds of depression and disillusionment among young readers. And Lee Dal emphasized that profound significance in life could only be found through strenuous efforts. As an anarchist and anti-Japanese soldier, Lee Dal spent his whole life pursuing a free and equal society and wholly devoted himself to the independence of his nation.
Abstract
The anarchist and anti-Japanese soldier, Lee Dal(1910-1942) who was the member of the South China Korean Youth League and the Korean volunteer corps, wrote many articles for Chinese and Korean publications. His most noted works were critiques about modern Chinese literature on Korean publications from Jan. 1935 to the Spring of 1936. Focusing on Ba Jin’s collection of short stories, Revenge, he wrote a critique about Ba Jin(巴金)’s attitude of writing. Instead of emphasizing the noble sacrifices made in war, Lee Dal pursued human justice and humanity beyond the narrow scope of nationalism or distorted patriotism. He had high regards for Guo Mo-ruo(郭沫若)’s rebellious spirit as an enlightening light and indomitable spirit in dark times. But he criticized severely Mao Dun(茅盾)’s trilogy, Disillusionment, Disturbance, Persuit. He claimed that Mao Dun’s writings sowed seeds of depression and disillusionment among young readers. And Lee Dal emphasized that profound significance in life could only be found through strenuous efforts. As an anarchist and anti-Japanese soldier, Lee Dal spent his whole life pursuing a free and equal society and wholly devoted himself to the independence of his nation.
참고문헌 (27)
- 李達, "現代中國文壇의 十大女作家論", 東亞日報, 1935.1.16-19, ~ (1935)
- 李達, "中國新詩와 戱劇", 東亞日報, 1935.3.1., ~ (1935)
- 李達, "郭沫若論", 朝鮮中央日報, 1935.10.26-29., ~ (1935)
- 李達, "反動文學의 寵兒‘茅盾三部曲’ 解說", 朝鮮日報, 1935.12.23., ~ (1935)
- 李達, "中國作家巴金의 創作態度의 考察", 新人文學, 3(2) (1936)
- 丁來東, "中國新詩의 展望", 朝鮮文學, 2(7) (1936)
- 巴金, "創作回憶錄" (1982), 人民文學出版社
- 賀玉波, "歌頌母愛的冰心女士", 現代文學評論, 2(3) (1931)
- 賀玉波, "現代中國作家論" (1932), 光華書局
- 賀玉波, "中國現代女作家" (1932), 現代書局
- 李芾甘, "一封公開的信", 民國日報⋅覺悟, 1926.3.27., ~ (1926)
- 中韓文化學會, "中韓文化 創刊號", ~ (1945)
- 김명섭, "재일 한인 아나키즘운동 연구", 박사, 한국사, pp.2001
- 김시준, "光復以前韓國에서의 魯迅文學과 魯迅", 중국문학, 29 (1998)
- 김희곤, "이육사 평전" (2010), 푸른역사
- 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소, "中國新聞韓國獨立運動記事集(I)― 朝鮮義勇隊(軍)" (2008), 독립기념관 한국독립운동사연구소
- 류자명, "나의 회억" (1984), 료녕인민출판사
- 무정부주의운동사 편찬위원회, "韓國아나키즘 運動史" (1978), 형설출판사
- 朴蘭英, "巴金과 한국의 아나키스트", 중국어문논총, 25, pp.495~516 (2003), 중국어문연구회
- 이호룡, "한국의 아나키즘 : 운동편" (2015), 지식산업사
- 정래동, "정래동 전집" (1971), 금강출판사
- 정래동, "二. 回顧錄", 중국어문학, 2 (1981)
- 조성환, "북경의 기억, 그리고 서사된 북경", 중국학, 27 (2006)
- 조세현, "1930년대 한중 아나키스트의 반파시즘 투쟁과 국제연대 - 巴金과 柳子明을 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(17), pp.327~355 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 홍석표, "중국현대문학사" (2015), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 黃修己, "중국 현대문학발전사" (2006), 범우사
- 吳中杰, "중국현대문예사조사" (2001), 신아사
