본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1920년대 한⋅중 문예논쟁시기 유기석의 아나키즘문예인식에 대한 재고

The Reconsideration of Yu Kiseok’s View on Literature and Art during the Literary Debates between Anarchism and Marxism in Korea and China in the 1920s

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to research Yu Kiseok’s views and cognitive characteristics on literature and art. Yu Kiseok (1905-1980) was an Korean anti-Japan independence activist and anarchist who had been active in China. In the early and middle 1920s, Yu Kiseok was influenced by anarchism through the exchanges and communication with Korean anarchists in China and Chinese anarchists, and began to pay attention to anarchism literature and art. Later, influenced by Kropotkin’s and Tolstoy’s literary thoughts, in the late 1920s he participated in the literary debates between anarchism and marxism in Korea and China and published a number of articles to clarify his unique views on literature and art. This paper investigates Yu Kiseok’s opinions and views on literature and art from three aspects: the subject attribute, the social attribute and the essential attribute, deeply explaining the equality consciousness and the public, the resistance consciousness and social utility, the life consciousness and individuality, and further extracts the reasonable factors to discuss the significance of them. Generally speaking, Yu Kiseok’s opinions and views on literature and art have the following special historical significance. Firstly, the “subjectivity of literature and art”, the life consciousness and the emphasis on the importance of individuality reflected the independence and originality of literature and art. It is directly related to the essence of literature and art, and gives us quite a few enlightenments that enables us to understand them more deeply. Secondly, he integrated class consciousness and ideology into literature and art, and emphasized the resistance and struggle of literature and art against imperial oppression, which has very important practical significance. Thirdly, his opinions and views on literature and art made a certain contribution to enhancing the vitality and combat effectiveness, enriching the literary theories at that time. This paper hopes to provide some reference for a more comprehensive understanding of Yu Kiseok and his views on literature and art, and objectively evaluate the significance and value of his anarchism literary thought in the history of Korean and Chinese literary criticism in the 1920s.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to research Yu Kiseok’s views and cognitive characteristics on literature and art. Yu Kiseok (1905-1980) was an Korean anti-Japan independence activist and anarchist who had been active in China. In the early and middle 1920s, Yu Kiseok was influenced by anarchism through the exchanges and communication with Korean anarchists in China and Chinese anarchists, and began to pay attention to anarchism literature and art. Later, influenced by Kropotkin’s and Tolstoy’s literary thoughts, in the late 1920s he participated in the literary debates between anarchism and marxism in Korea and China and published a number of articles to clarify his unique views on literature and art. This paper investigates Yu Kiseok’s opinions and views on literature and art from three aspects: the subject attribute, the social attribute and the essential attribute, deeply explaining the equality consciousness and the public, the resistance consciousness and social utility, the life consciousness and individuality, and further extracts the reasonable factors to discuss the significance of them. Generally speaking, Yu Kiseok’s opinions and views on literature and art have the following special historical significance. Firstly, the “subjectivity of literature and art”, the life consciousness and the emphasis on the importance of individuality reflected the independence and originality of literature and art. It is directly related to the essence of literature and art, and gives us quite a few enlightenments that enables us to understand them more deeply. Secondly, he integrated class consciousness and ideology into literature and art, and emphasized the resistance and struggle of literature and art against imperial oppression, which has very important practical significance. Thirdly, his opinions and views on literature and art made a certain contribution to enhancing the vitality and combat effectiveness, enriching the literary theories at that time. This paper hopes to provide some reference for a more comprehensive understanding of Yu Kiseok and his views on literature and art, and objectively evaluate the significance and value of his anarchism literary thought in the history of Korean and Chinese literary criticism in the 1920s.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 太 一, "克魯泡特金的文學研究", 民鐘, 1(4) (1922)
  2. 柳 絮, "크로포트킨의 文藝觀", 東光, (5) (1926)
  3. 金華山, "階級藝術論의 新展開", 朝鮮文壇, (20) (1927)
  4. 艾 絮, "無產藝術의 新展開의 批判之批判", 新民, (29) (1927)
  5. 柳 絮, "藝術的理論鬥爭——答畸形的谷蔭君>", ≪民眾日報≫ 第157號, ~ (1928)
  6. 柳 絮, "無産階級藝術新論(續)", 民力副刊, (211) (1928)
  7. 柳 絮, "映畫藝術論", ≪民眾日報≫ 第171號, ~ (1928)
  8. 柳 絮, "民衆藝術與作家", 現代文化, 1(1) (1928)
  9. 廉想涉, "文學上의 集團意識과 個人意識", 文藝公論, (創刊) (1929)
  10. 廉想涉, "文學上的集團意識與個人意識", 群眾月刊(上海), 1(6) (1929)
  11. 謙 弟, "勞動階級解放的道路", 民鋒, 2(3) (1927)
  12. 김영민, "한국문학비평논쟁사" (1992), 한길사
  13. 김영민, "한국근대문학비평사" (1999), 소명출판사
  14. 홍문표, "한국현대문학논쟁사" (2018), 창조문학사
  15. 何魯之, "歐洲近古史" (1934), 商務印書館
  16. 黃凌霜, "克魯泡特金的思想" (1920), 泰東書局
  17. 黃 健, "文學與人生八講" (2015), 商務印書館
  18. 李何林, "中國文藝論戰" (1984), 陜西人民出版社
  19. 李 姝, "西方文化專題導論" (2013), 西南交通大學出版社
  20. 劉長鼎, "中國現代文學運動史料編年(中編)1927-1937" (1993), 山西高校聯合出版社
  21. 列夫, "托爾斯泰讀書隨筆" (1999), 三聯書店
  22. 列夫, "托爾斯泰論文藝" (2011), 金城出版社
  23. 饶芃子, "思想文綜 4 當代文化研究專輯" (1999), 暨南大學出版社
  24. 唐 鉞, "教育大辭書" (1930), 商務印書館
  25. 蘇 珊, "藝術問題" (1983), 中國社會科學出版社
  26. 下中邦彦, "世界大百科事典" (1969), 平凡社
  27. 남도현, "야니기 무네요시(柳宗悅)예술관의 낭만주의적 성격 연구", 박사, pp.2017
  28. 김양수, "1920년대 상하이의 ‘혁명문학’논쟁과 한국 출신 논객 유서(柳絮)", 중국문학연구, (59), pp.73~91 (2015), 한국중문학회
  29. 김은하, "1920년대 중후반 아나키즘적 민족주의의 문학적 입장과 『삼대』에 나타난 국제적 민족협동전선 구축의 문제", 한국현대문학연구, (62), pp.109~141 (2020), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
  30. 김지영, "1920년대 대중문학 개념 연구 - 카프 대중화론과 ‘통속’, ‘민중’, ‘대중’의 의미투쟁을 중심으로 -", 우리문학연구, (48), pp.215~260 (2015), 우리문학회
  31. 김진희, "20세기초 일본 생명주의와 김억의 문학사상 -베르그송 철학의 수용을 중심으로-", 일본문화연구, (76), pp.29~58 (2020), 동아시아일본학회[DOI]
  32. 박양신, "다이쇼 시기 일본ㆍ식민지 조선의 민중예술론 : 로맹 롤랑의 ‘제국’ 횡단", 한림일본학 (구 한림일본학연구), (22), pp.33~60 (2013), 일본학연구소
  33. 최기영, "1920∼30년대 유기석의 재중독립운동과 아나키즘", 한국근현대사연구, (55), pp.127~160 (2010), 한국근현대사학회
  34. 江守義, "“文藝大眾化”與“以人民爲中心”", 中國社會科學報 (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)