본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

루소 정치 사상의 전파 과정을 통해 본 중국 전통 사상과 서구 정치 사상의 교류와 소통

The Communications between Traditional Chinese and Western Thought: Focusing on the Introduction of Rousseau’s Political Thought into China

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Rousseau’s political thought represents characteristics that are distinct from the British Liberalism. Distinct from the British Liberalism based on the philosophical tradition of Empiricism, Rousseau focuses on the “forced to be free” environment that enables each individual to be free and to pursue the ideal. Rousseau’s political thinking had a profound influence on the French Revolution. And when introduced into China, his thought played an important role in late Qing thinkers’ search for revolutionary ideas. If so, in what ways did Liang Qichao, the most significant figure in importing Rousseau’s thought into China, adopt Rousseau’s thought and introduce it to the Chinese people? This study examines the ways in which Rousseau’s political thought was introduced into China and what the relationships were between his thinking and traditional Chinese thought. Focusing on the relationship between Rousseau’s thought and traditional Chinese thought, I also examine how contemporary Chinese thinkers understood Rousseau and on what grounds they either adopted or criticized his thought. By doing this, we can understand the entire process of importation, acceptance and transformation of Western thought, as the process of selective acceptance and creative transformation. First, I pay special attention to Liang Qichao insofar as he played a significant role in the spread of Rousseau’s thought in China. In order to understand the background of Liang Qichao’s thinking, I explore what his understanding of late Qing thought was, in what ways he received Rousseau’s political thought, and what were the aspects of ideological exchange in his introduction of Rousseau into China. Next, I compare Rousseau’s ethics with traditional Chinese ethics in the Yangming philosophy that was adopted by Liang Qichao and played an important role in the spread of Rousseau’s thought in China. By comparing the similarities and differences between the Chinese and Western ethics, I examine what the influence of traditional Chinese thought was upon Chinese intellectuals’ reception and transformation of Western political thoughts. Hence, this study explores the interplay and communication between the tradition and the modern.

Abstract

Rousseau’s political thought represents characteristics that are distinct from the British Liberalism. Distinct from the British Liberalism based on the philosophical tradition of Empiricism, Rousseau focuses on the “forced to be free” environment that enables each individual to be free and to pursue the ideal. Rousseau’s political thinking had a profound influence on the French Revolution. And when introduced into China, his thought played an important role in late Qing thinkers’ search for revolutionary ideas. If so, in what ways did Liang Qichao, the most significant figure in importing Rousseau’s thought into China, adopt Rousseau’s thought and introduce it to the Chinese people? This study examines the ways in which Rousseau’s political thought was introduced into China and what the relationships were between his thinking and traditional Chinese thought. Focusing on the relationship between Rousseau’s thought and traditional Chinese thought, I also examine how contemporary Chinese thinkers understood Rousseau and on what grounds they either adopted or criticized his thought. By doing this, we can understand the entire process of importation, acceptance and transformation of Western thought, as the process of selective acceptance and creative transformation. First, I pay special attention to Liang Qichao insofar as he played a significant role in the spread of Rousseau’s thought in China. In order to understand the background of Liang Qichao’s thinking, I explore what his understanding of late Qing thought was, in what ways he received Rousseau’s political thought, and what were the aspects of ideological exchange in his introduction of Rousseau into China. Next, I compare Rousseau’s ethics with traditional Chinese ethics in the Yangming philosophy that was adopted by Liang Qichao and played an important role in the spread of Rousseau’s thought in China. By comparing the similarities and differences between the Chinese and Western ethics, I examine what the influence of traditional Chinese thought was upon Chinese intellectuals’ reception and transformation of Western political thoughts. Hence, this study explores the interplay and communication between the tradition and the modern.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Susan Dunn, "The Social Contract and The First and Second Discourses" (2002), Yale University
  2. 王守仁, "傳習錄 上" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
  3. 王汎森, "中國近代思想中的傳統因素:兼論思想的本質與思想的功", 學人, 12 (1997)
  4. 王憲明, "關於戊戌時期嚴復傳播”社會契約論”和”天賦人權論”問題再探 in: 嚴復思想新論" (1999), 淸華大學出版社
  5. 艾爾曼, "中國文化史的新方向:一些有待討論的意見─代中文版序 in: 經學政治和宗族:中華帝國晩期常州今文學派硏究" (1998), 江蘇人民出版社
  6. 村尾進, "萬木森森─≪時務報≫時期的梁啓超及其周圍的情況 in: 梁啓超、 明治日本、 西方" (2001), 社會科學文獻出版社
  7. 林啓彦, "嚴復與章士釗─有關盧梭≪民約論≫的一次思想論爭", 漢學硏究, 20(1) (2002)
  8. 蕭公權, "中國政治思想史" (1989), 聯經
  9. 林滿紅, "古文與經世:19世紀初葉中國兩派經世思想的分殊基礎", 臺大歷史學報, 15 (1990)
  10. 高瀬武次郎, "日本之陽明學" (1899), 鐵華書院
  11. 康有爲, "康南海自編年譜 in: 康南海先生遺著匯刊 第22冊" (1976), 宏業書局
  12. 張載, "誠明 第六, 正蒙" (1985), 中華書局
  13. 戚學民, "嚴復<政治講義>硏究:文本淵源、 言說對象及理論意義", 박사, pp.2005
  14. 戚學民, "嚴復政治文本溯源", 歷史硏究, 2 (2004)
  15. 梁啓超, "飮冰室合集" (1989), 中華書局
  16. 梁啓超, "≪康南海先生傳≫ ≪文集之六≫", ~
  17. 梁啓超, "≪東籍月旦≫, ≪文集之四≫", ~
  18. 梁啓超, "≪斯片挪莎學案≫, ≪文集之六≫", ~
  19. 梁啓超, "≪湖南時務學堂學約≫, ≪文集之二≫", ~
  20. 梁啓超, "≪盧梭學案≫, ≪文集之六≫", ~
  21. 梁啓超, "≪三十自述≫, ≪文集之十一≫", ~
  22. 梁啓超, "≪清代學術概論≫, ≪專集之三十四≫", ~
  23. 梁啓超, "≪德育鑒≫, ≪專集之二十六≫", ~
  24. 章太炎, "敎育的根本要從自國自心發出來 in: 章太炎的白話文" (2003), 遼寧敎育出版社
  25. 章太炎, "答鐵錚" (1982), 上海人民出版社
  26. 黃克武, "一個被放棄的選擇:梁啓超調適思想之硏究" (1994), 中研院近史所
  27. 黄克武, "日本陽明学與中国近代化", 2006年度財団法人交流協会日台交流センター日台研究支援事業報告書 (2007)
  28. 양태근, "소극적 민권론과 적극적 민권론을 통해 본 梁啓超의 자유주의 사상과 도덕주의", 東方學志, 135 (2006)
  29. 장 자크 루소, "학문과 예술에 대하여 in: 학문과 예술에 대하여 외" (2007), 한길사
  30. 福澤諭吉, "文明論槪略.智德的區別" (1997), 商務印書館
  31. 錢穆, "經學大要" (2000), 素書樓文敎基金會
  32. 嚴復, "憲法大義" (1986), 中華書局
  33. 嚴復, "≪≪陽明先生集要三種≫ 序≫, ≪嚴復集≫", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)