본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

마오쩌동의 입시제도개혁과 ‘출신가정’문제 ― 세대갈등을 중심으로

Family Origin Issues and Education Reform - In the Year 1966 and 1958

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This thesis dose research on the process that education system resulted in the exclusion of zhiqing(知靑) known as deep-rooted victims from society. The exclusion is one of the potential contradictions in New China society of the conflict. In New China as a socialist country, power divided according to the political attitude and pedigree rather than economic wealth. Redistribution of power made the man born in the family of ideological problems be at a disadvantage in the various admission tests. This thesis analyzes a controversy of pedigree issue in 1966 as an explosion of conflict and process of education reform by Mao in 1958 as exclusion of a starting point. Existing research studied problems of origin as one among standards of admission tests and they considered the problem as only the cause of decline in the scholastic ability. But this study renews the problem in the context of social reform. Mao's education reform made origin establish main standard in the three admissions criteria: academic achivement, family origin, political attitude. This policy aimed to give students from workers and farmers and to limit entry person born in the family of ideological problems. Mao's education reform carried through with the policy set a goal of rural industrialization and modernization without expert to modernize New China in agricultural country. However, the original plan did not come true. This thesis comes to a conclusion through analyzing into process of mao's 1958 education reform. First of all, Mao' goal failed to raise 60% college students from farmers and workers. this fail was due to a abuse of executive privilege as external factor and recklessness of modernization of the Great Leap Forward as internal fault of policy. Secondly, undemocratic procedure, fundamental restriction in selection of the excellent young needed to modernize, was the cause of social conflicts in the Cultural Revolution. This thesis is presented for this example, person disqualified for pass instructed ahead of competition in the ‘absolute confidentiality' documents of government. Nevertheless, Mao trusted the possibility of thought-remolding through education, he did not attain the object of modernization because of sticking to intrinsic nature. And it leaves a scar to be hard to heal. The scar is hostilities that generations of children considered their parents as an opponent to overcome.

Abstract

This thesis dose research on the process that education system resulted in the exclusion of zhiqing(知靑) known as deep-rooted victims from society. The exclusion is one of the potential contradictions in New China society of the conflict. In New China as a socialist country, power divided according to the political attitude and pedigree rather than economic wealth. Redistribution of power made the man born in the family of ideological problems be at a disadvantage in the various admission tests. This thesis analyzes a controversy of pedigree issue in 1966 as an explosion of conflict and process of education reform by Mao in 1958 as exclusion of a starting point. Existing research studied problems of origin as one among standards of admission tests and they considered the problem as only the cause of decline in the scholastic ability. But this study renews the problem in the context of social reform. Mao's education reform made origin establish main standard in the three admissions criteria: academic achivement, family origin, political attitude. This policy aimed to give students from workers and farmers and to limit entry person born in the family of ideological problems. Mao's education reform carried through with the policy set a goal of rural industrialization and modernization without expert to modernize New China in agricultural country. However, the original plan did not come true. This thesis comes to a conclusion through analyzing into process of mao's 1958 education reform. First of all, Mao' goal failed to raise 60% college students from farmers and workers. this fail was due to a abuse of executive privilege as external factor and recklessness of modernization of the Great Leap Forward as internal fault of policy. Secondly, undemocratic procedure, fundamental restriction in selection of the excellent young needed to modernize, was the cause of social conflicts in the Cultural Revolution. This thesis is presented for this example, person disqualified for pass instructed ahead of competition in the ‘absolute confidentiality' documents of government. Nevertheless, Mao trusted the possibility of thought-remolding through education, he did not attain the object of modernization because of sticking to intrinsic nature. And it leaves a scar to be hard to heal. The scar is hostilities that generations of children considered their parents as an opponent to overcome.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "人民日報(1949-1976)", ~ (1976)
  2. "上海档案館 档案資料(1049-1973)", ~ (1973)
  3. "≪中國靑年≫(1949-1966)", ~ (1966)
  4. "≪紅旗≫(1960-66)", ~ (1966)
  5. "사상계(1956-1966)", ~ (1966)
  6. 이홍영, "From Revolutionary Cadre to Bureaucratic Technocrats in: 중국의 정치엘리트" (1997), 나남출판
  7. 中國敎育年鑑 編輯部, "中國敎育年鑑 1949-1981" (1984), 中國大百科全書出版社
  8. 中共中央党校党史教研室, "中共黨史參考資料" (1979), 人民出版社版
  9. 定宜庄, "中國知靑史―初瀾(1953-1968)" (1998), 中國社會科學出版社
  10. 中央敎育科學硏究所, "中華人民共和國敎育大事記(1949-1982)" (1983), 敎育科學出版社
  11. Tan Fang, "Highlights of Da-zi-bao ― During the Cultural Revolution" (1996), Mirror Books
  12. Jonathan Unger, "Education Under Mao: class and competition in Canton schools, 1960-1980" (1982), Columbia University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)