중국 지식인과 국가관계의 변천 : 체제 수호세력인가 시민사회 추동세력인가?
The Relation between Chinese Intellectuals and the State: Regime Protection Force or Driving Force of Civil Society?
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After reform and open policy, the relation between chinese intellectuals and the state showed compromising and cooperative feature rather than confrontational feature despite the increase of autonomous realm. Especially after the peak of democratizaton movement of Tiananmen Square in 1989, any activities of resistance such as anti-CCP movement almost disappeared after that period. On one hand of the cooperative and coexisting relation between intellectuals and the state, there is an aspect of weakened spirit of social criticism of the intellectuals due to the tendency of professionalization and commercialization of intellectuals resulting from the marketization. On the other hand, it’s because the responding strategy of the state (dual strategy of control and inclusion) was effective. Presupposing the nonresistant and cooperative attitude of the Chinese intellectuals towards the state that was analyzed in this study, it suggests a high possibility of ‘gradual change from top-down’ or maintaining unstable condition (mixing condition) for a considerable period of time in the future path of China’s political democratization rather than the path of ‘radical change from bottom-up’.
Abstract
After reform and open policy, the relation between chinese intellectuals and the state showed compromising and cooperative feature rather than confrontational feature despite the increase of autonomous realm. Especially after the peak of democratizaton movement of Tiananmen Square in 1989, any activities of resistance such as anti-CCP movement almost disappeared after that period. On one hand of the cooperative and coexisting relation between intellectuals and the state, there is an aspect of weakened spirit of social criticism of the intellectuals due to the tendency of professionalization and commercialization of intellectuals resulting from the marketization. On the other hand, it’s because the responding strategy of the state (dual strategy of control and inclusion) was effective. Presupposing the nonresistant and cooperative attitude of the Chinese intellectuals towards the state that was analyzed in this study, it suggests a high possibility of ‘gradual change from top-down’ or maintaining unstable condition (mixing condition) for a considerable period of time in the future path of China’s political democratization rather than the path of ‘radical change from bottom-up’.
참고문헌 (49)
- 서진영, "21세기 중국정치" (2008), 폴리테이아
- 서석흥, "2004년 중국 郞咸平논쟁의 쟁점과 해석", (사)현대중국학회 2005년 춘계학술대회 논문집 (2005)
- 이남주, "중국 시민사회의 형성과 특징" (2007), 폴리테이아
- 이욱연, "지식인의 사회적 위상과 문화적 역할, in: 전환기의 중국사회Ⅰ" (2004), 오름
- 자오궈뱌오, "당신들의 중국:토벌중선부" (2006), 한겨레출판사
- 전성흥, "중국의 국가-사회관계 연구, in: 연구론" (2000), 나남
- 존 킹 페어뱅크, "신중국사" (2005), 까치
- 조너던 D.스펜스, "천안문:근대중국을 만든 사람들" (1999), 이산
- 조영남, "후진타오 시대의 중국정치" (2006), 나남
- Barry Sautman, "Sirensofthe Strongman:Neo-Authoritarianism ofRecent ChinesePoliticalTheory", ChinaQuarterly, (129), pp.72~102 (1992)
- BruceJ. Dickson, "Dilemma ofParty adaptation;TheCCP’sstrategiesfor survivalv, in: State and Societyin 21st-centuryChina" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Carol Hamrin, "Chinese Establishment Intellectuals" (1986)
- Chen Fong-ching, "From YouthfulManuscripts to River Elegy: The Chinese Popular Cultural Movement and Political Transformation 1979-1989" (1997), Chinese University Press
- Daniel Kane, "TheSocialand intellectualelite, in: China’s Quiet Revolution" (1994), Longman Cheshire
- Edward Gu, "Chinese Intellectuals Between State and Market" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Edward X. Gu, "Social capital,institutional change and the develop mentofnon-governmentalintellectualorganizationsin China, in: ChineseIntellectualsBetweenStateandMarket" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Edward X.Gu, "Plural Institutionalism and the Emergence of Intellectual Public Spacesin China:A Case Study of Four Intellectual Groups, in: China and Democracy: The Prospect for A Democratic China New York" (2000), Routledge
- Harley Balzer, "Stateand societyin transitionsfrom communism, in: State and Society in 21st-century China" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- Joseph Fewsmith, "China Since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Joseph Fewsmith, "Dilemmas of Reform in China: Political Conflict and Economic Debate" (1994), M.E.Sharpe
- Ka-hoMok, "Intellectuals and The Statein Post-MaoChina" (1998), Martins’s Press
- Mary Gallagher, "The Limit of Civil Society in a Late Leninist State, in: Civil Society and Political Change in Asia: Expanding and Contracting Democratic Space" (2004), Stanford UniversityPress
- Merle Goldman, "Politically-Engaged Intellectuals in the 1990s", China Quarterly, (159) (1999)
- Merle Goldman, "Politically-Engaged Intellectualsin theDeng-JiangEra:A ChangingRelationship with theParty-State", The China Quarterly, (145) (1996)
- Merle Goldman, "Sowing the Seeds of Democracyin China:Political Reform in the Deng Xiaoping Era" (1994), Harvard University Press
- Merle Goldman, "The Intellectuals in the Deng Xiapping Era, in: State and Society in China:The Consequencesof Reform" (1992), Arthur Lewis Rosenbaum ed.State and Society in China:The Consequencesof Reform,Boulder,Westview Press
- Suisheng Zhao, "A Nation-State By Construction: Dynamics of Modern ChineseNationalism" (2004), StanfordUniv.Press
- Suisheng Zhao, "A State-led Nationalism: The Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China", Communistand Post-Communist Studies, 31(3) (1998)
- Suzanne Ogden, "From patronage to profits: the changing relationship of Chinese intellectuals with the Party-state, in: Chinese Intellectuals Between State and Market" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- TeresaWright, "Intellectuals and the politics of protest:The case of China democracy party,in : Chinese Intellectuals Between State and Market" (2004), in Edward Gu and Goldman eds.,Chinese Intellectuals Between State and Market,New York,RoutledgeCurzon
- Yuezhi Zhao, "Underdogs, lapdogs and watchdogs:journalists and the public sphere problematic in China, in: Chinese Intellectuals Between State and Market" (2004), Routledge Curzon
- "周恩來選集 第5卷" (1977), 人民出版社
- 原方, "知識分子論" (2005), 上海三聯書店
- 韓亞光, "中國現代化進程中的知識分子問題硏究", 박사, pp.2003
- 胡繩, "中國共産黨的七十年" (1991), 中共黨史出版社
- 余英時, "中國知識人之史的考察, in: 20世紀中國知識分子史論" (2005), 出版社
- 薺墨, "新權威主義:對中國大陸未來命運的爭論" (1991), 唐山出版社
- 馬立誠, "交鋒:當代中國三次思想解放實錄" (1998), 今日出版社
- 胡鞍鋼, "國家能力報告" (1993), 遼寧人民出版社
- 蕭功秦, "當代中國知識分子的思想分化及其政治影響, in: 中國的大轉型" (2008), 新星出版社
- 徐友漁, "當代中國公共知識分子的生成", 當代中國硏究, 4
- 朱蘇力, "公共知識分子的社會建構", 天涯, 5 (2004)
- 李世濤, "知識分子立場：激進與保守之間的動蕩" (2000), 時代文藝出版社
- 李世濤, "知識分子立場：民族主義與轉型期中國的命運" (2000), 時代文藝出版社
- 李世濤, "知識分子立場：自由主義之爭與中國思想界的分化" (2000), 時代文藝出版社
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]