본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Psychological Aspects of Patriotism and Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

This study is designed to shed some light on the future of territorial disputes in Northeast Asia countries - claiming territorial sovereignty over small islands – Senkaku/Daioyu between China and Japan, and Dok-do/ Takesima between Japan and S. Korea. Without a doubt, the strong nationalism of three countries’ publics has been regarded as a key factor making the situation of sovereignty conflict even worse. Unlike the concept of nationalism originated from Western culture, there is a unique and traditional concept as, so called “Confucian Loyalty” a psychological aspect of patriotism in Northeast Asian countries. Due to the cultural influence by the fundamental tenet of Confucianism in Northeast Asia - all things in the universe exist in or survive for the harmonious relationship with other things - this study assumes that the public with a high level of Confucian Loyalty is less likely to support the government’s use of hard-power diplomatic methods for resolving the disputes than the public with a high level of nationalism. Given the statistical analysis of three countries’ public surveys, this study argues, when the territorial disputes emerging among three countries become the most important diplomatic issue in Northeast Asia, the relationship between Japan and China is going to be more serious than that of between Japan and S. Korea. Because both publics in Japan and China have a stronger nationalistic aspect of patriotism than S. Korean people, they won’t accept any situation in which their governments need to yield territorial sovereignty for a peaceful compromise against other states in disputed relations.

Abstract

This study is designed to shed some light on the future of territorial disputes in Northeast Asia countries - claiming territorial sovereignty over small islands – Senkaku/Daioyu between China and Japan, and Dok-do/ Takesima between Japan and S. Korea. Without a doubt, the strong nationalism of three countries’ publics has been regarded as a key factor making the situation of sovereignty conflict even worse. Unlike the concept of nationalism originated from Western culture, there is a unique and traditional concept as, so called “Confucian Loyalty” a psychological aspect of patriotism in Northeast Asian countries. Due to the cultural influence by the fundamental tenet of Confucianism in Northeast Asia - all things in the universe exist in or survive for the harmonious relationship with other things - this study assumes that the public with a high level of Confucian Loyalty is less likely to support the government’s use of hard-power diplomatic methods for resolving the disputes than the public with a high level of nationalism. Given the statistical analysis of three countries’ public surveys, this study argues, when the territorial disputes emerging among three countries become the most important diplomatic issue in Northeast Asia, the relationship between Japan and China is going to be more serious than that of between Japan and S. Korea. Because both publics in Japan and China have a stronger nationalistic aspect of patriotism than S. Korean people, they won’t accept any situation in which their governments need to yield territorial sovereignty for a peaceful compromise against other states in disputed relations.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Adorno, Theodor, "The Authoritarian Personality" (1950), Harper & Row
  2. Bar-Tal, Daniel, "Patriotism in the Lives of Individuals and Nations" (1997), Nelson-Hall
  3. Blank, Thomas, "National Identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or Patriotism? An Empirical Test with Representative data", Political Psychology, 24, pp.289~311 (2003)
  4. Blank, Thomas, "Determinants of National Identity in East and West Germany: An Empirical Comparison of Theories on the Significance of Authoritarianism, Anomie, and General Self-esteem", Political Psychology, 24, pp.259~288 (2003)
  5. Blank, Thomas, "A Contradiction, A Possibility, or an Empirical Reality? ‘Patriotism’", ECPR (2001)
  6. Chan, W., "The Evolution of the Confucian Concept of Jen", Philosophy East and West, 4(4), pp.295~391 (1955)
  7. Davidov, Eldad, "Measurement Equivalence of Nationalism and Constructive Patriotism in the ISSP: 34 Countries in a Comparative Perspective", Political Analysis, 17, pp.64~82 (2009)
  8. Diamond, Larry, "Consolidating Democracy in South Korea" (2000), Lynne Rienner Publishers
  9. Ford, James, "The Teachings of Confucius: The Analects, The Great Learning & The Doctrine of the Mean" (2005), El Paso Norte Press
  10. Hjerm, Mikael, "National Identities, National Pride, and Xenophobia: A Comparison of Four Western Countries", Acta Sociologica, 41(4), pp.335~347 (1998)
  11. Hwang, Kwang-Kuo, "The Deep Structure of Confucianism: a social psychological approach", Asian Philosophy, pp.179~204 (2001)
  12. Jackson, Robert, "Introduction to International Relations: Theories and approaches" (2003), Oxford University Press
  13. 김병선, "Digitalization of Korean Studies Materials: An Overview", The Review of Korean Studies, 8(4), pp.5~18 (2005), 한국학중앙연구원
  14. Leventhal, G. S, "Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research" (1980), Plenum Press
  15. Levy-Bruhl, L., "How Natives Think" (1966), Washington Square Press
  16. Pao, Hsiao-Tien, "A Comparison of Neural Network and Multiple Regression Analysis in Modeling Capital Structure", Science Direct, 35, pp.720~727 (2008)
  17. Rozman, Gilbert, "Chinese National Identity and Its Implications for International Relations in East Asia", Asia-Pacific Review, 18(1), pp.84~97 (2011)
  18. Schatz, Robert, "On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind versus Constructive Patriotism", Political Psychology, 20(1), pp.151~174 (1999)
  19. Seckington, Ian, "Nationalism, Ideology and China’s “Fourth Generation” Leadership", Chinese Nationalism: Critical and Interdisciplinary Views
  20. Sommerville, Johann, "Patriotism and War", Ethics, 91, pp.568~578 (1981)
  21. Thomson, Ann M., "Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1, pp.1~34 (2007)
  22. Valencia, Mark J., "Domestic Politics Fuels Northeast Asian Maritime Disputes", Asia Pacific Issues, pp.1~8 (2000)
  23. Zhao, Suisheng, "The Olympics and Chinese Nationalism", China Security (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)