Dispute over Diaoyudao (Senkakuretto) and Its Implications for Dokdo ― Conflicts over History, Relevant Names and Boundaries ―
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study surveys the issue of Diaoyudao out of Japan's several territorial disputes, laying stress on geographical names, history, state position, boundaries, and its implications for Dokdo. Today, both China and Japan continue to have a variety of opposing opinions in connection with the territoriality over Diaoyudao. From the perspective of a third party, it may not be easy to regard the opinion of a state party as appropriate. However, provided that one considers the historical aspects only, it seems hard to deny that the Chinese opinion is more persuasive. Since 1971, the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan has been one of the most difficult disputes in the world, as the islands are located in the area rich in hydrocarbon resources as well as strategically important for both countries. China and Japan stick to their respective opinions that the territoriality of its own country over the islands is unquestionable under international law or from historical point of view. As there is a great difference of opinions between the two states, the propriety of territorial dispute around these islands does not look to be resolved in the near future. Anyway, we cannot help paying sharp attention to the progress of this dispute. It is because there is considerable similarity between the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan, and the Dokdo issue between Korea and Japan in many respects. So, after examining relevant historical and legal issues relating to this dispute, we should prepare for the incessant Japan's territorial claim over Dokdo. Japan holds a view that keeping occupation over its own territory is the best policy, whereas it insists that it should keep raising objections to other countries' occupation of the disputed territories. Thereupon, we should have a deep understanding of Japan's self-contradictory attitude towards relevant territorial disputes, and then we should work out a rational countermeasure with regard to Dokdo based on cool judgment.
Abstract
This study surveys the issue of Diaoyudao out of Japan's several territorial disputes, laying stress on geographical names, history, state position, boundaries, and its implications for Dokdo. Today, both China and Japan continue to have a variety of opposing opinions in connection with the territoriality over Diaoyudao. From the perspective of a third party, it may not be easy to regard the opinion of a state party as appropriate. However, provided that one considers the historical aspects only, it seems hard to deny that the Chinese opinion is more persuasive. Since 1971, the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan has been one of the most difficult disputes in the world, as the islands are located in the area rich in hydrocarbon resources as well as strategically important for both countries. China and Japan stick to their respective opinions that the territoriality of its own country over the islands is unquestionable under international law or from historical point of view. As there is a great difference of opinions between the two states, the propriety of territorial dispute around these islands does not look to be resolved in the near future. Anyway, we cannot help paying sharp attention to the progress of this dispute. It is because there is considerable similarity between the territorial dispute over Diaoyudao between China and Japan, and the Dokdo issue between Korea and Japan in many respects. So, after examining relevant historical and legal issues relating to this dispute, we should prepare for the incessant Japan's territorial claim over Dokdo. Japan holds a view that keeping occupation over its own territory is the best policy, whereas it insists that it should keep raising objections to other countries' occupation of the disputed territories. Thereupon, we should have a deep understanding of Japan's self-contradictory attitude towards relevant territorial disputes, and then we should work out a rational countermeasure with regard to Dokdo based on cool judgment.
참고문헌 (27)
- Akashi Yasushi, "Territorial Issues of Japan" (2002), Jiyukokuminsha
- Ando Nisuke, "International law" (1993), Yuhikaku
- Brownlie, Ian, "The Rule of Law in International Affairs-International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations-", ~ (1998)
- Islands Disputes in the East Asia and Dokdo, "Charn-kiu KIM", ~ (1998)
- Chiyuki Mizukami, "Law of the Sea" (2005), Yushinto
- Choung-Il Chee, "Korean Perspectives on Ocean Law Issues for the 21st Century" (1999), Kluwer Law International
- Hungdah Chiu, "An Analysis of the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the T'iaoyutai Islets(Senkaku Gunto)", Chinese Yearbook of International Law and Affairs, 15 (1997)
- Jerome Alan Cohen, "People's China and International Law, A Documentary Study, Vol.1" (1974), Princeton University
- Kanae Taijudo, "Attribution Issue over Takeshima and Senkakusyoto" (1983), Yushinto
- Kanae Taijudo, "International Law on the Attribution of Territory" (1998), Toshinto
- Kazutaka Kishaba, "Senkakushoto and Records on Tribute Envoys", Okinawa Quarterly, 63 (1972)
- Kentaro Serita, "Territories of Japan" (2002), Chuokoronsha
- Martin Dixon, "Cases and Materials on International Law" (2000), Blackstone Press Limited
- Robert Jennings, "Oppenheim's International Law", ~ (1992)
- Inoue Kiyoshi, "Senkakuretto" (1996), Daisanshokan
- International Law Case Studies Group, "International Law Case Studies on Japan(3) – Territory -" (1990), Keiotsushin
- Hatano Ribo, "Work Book International Law" (1985), Yuhikaku
- Diaoyudao Issue, "How Should We See Senkakushoto", pp.2004, Murata Tadayishi
- International Court of Justice Opinion Briefs, "Ronald H. Severaid", ~ (1978)
- Tao Cheng, "The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Tiayutai (Senkaku) Isaland and the Law of Territorial Acquisition", Virginia Journal of International Law, 14 (1974)
- Ueji Tatsunori, "Senkakushoto and Takeshima" (1978), Kyoikusha
- Hosaka Yuji, "Korea Dokdo" (2010), Sungandang Company
- Okuhara Toshio, "The Territorial Sovereignty over the Senkaku Islands and Problems on the Surrounding Continental Shelf", Japanese Annual of International Law, (15) (1971)
- Jon M. Van Dyke, "Legal Issues related to Sovereignty over Dokdo and Its Maritime Boundary", Ocean Development and International Law, 38 (2007)
- Steven Wei Su, "The Territorial Dispute over the Tiaoyu", Senakaku Islands, 2005, pp.36, ~
- Yamada Yoshiko, "Boundaries of Japan" (2005), Shinchosha
- Yoshiro Matsui, "Internatinal Law of Territorial Acquisition and the Dispute over the Senkaku(Diayu) Islands", Japanese Annual of International Law, (40) (1997)