A study on the origins of territorial disputes in Northeast Asia and a nationalistic approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to attempt a 'nationalist approach' to the territorialdispute that is a cause of conflict among the four Northeast Asian countries (Korea,Japan, China, and Russia) despite the era of globalization. Until now, territorialdisputes have been developed in the direction of seeking solutions in the historicalcontext, political and economic factors, and international law. It is true that suchstudies helped to understand the realistic background of territorial disputes, but theyhave some limitations in understanding and resolving territorial disputes at a morefundamental level. Basically, territorial disputes are based on nationalistic aspirationsthat differ from country to country. This is the anti-colonialization process in Chinathat developed in the late 19th century, the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) and theRusso-Japanese War (1904-1905). had a great influence on the formation. Eachcountry does not give up its political and economic gains, engages in an arms race tooccupy an advantageous position in the conflict, and displays a dual attitude ofmaintaining cooperation and exchanges despite strategic diplomatic friction. Ultimately, it is necessary to expand the possibility of mutual understanding forconflict resolution by understanding the meaning of territorial disputes to the peopleof each country and the collective characteristics of conflict resolution through thepolitical understanding of each country in Northeast Asia.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to attempt a 'nationalist approach' to the territorialdispute that is a cause of conflict among the four Northeast Asian countries (Korea,Japan, China, and Russia) despite the era of globalization. Until now, territorialdisputes have been developed in the direction of seeking solutions in the historicalcontext, political and economic factors, and international law. It is true that suchstudies helped to understand the realistic background of territorial disputes, but theyhave some limitations in understanding and resolving territorial disputes at a morefundamental level. Basically, territorial disputes are based on nationalistic aspirationsthat differ from country to country. This is the anti-colonialization process in Chinathat developed in the late 19th century, the Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) and theRusso-Japanese War (1904-1905). had a great influence on the formation. Eachcountry does not give up its political and economic gains, engages in an arms race tooccupy an advantageous position in the conflict, and displays a dual attitude ofmaintaining cooperation and exchanges despite strategic diplomatic friction. Ultimately, it is necessary to expand the possibility of mutual understanding forconflict resolution by understanding the meaning of territorial disputes to the peopleof each country and the collective characteristics of conflict resolution through thepolitical understanding of each country in Northeast Asia.
참고문헌 (27)
- Bae, Jin-soo, "Dokdo Issue 60 Years and Korea's Territorial Sovereignty" (2012), Northeast Asian History Foundation
- Choi, Tae-kang, "Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia : Focusing on the Russo-Japanese Relations" (2013), HallyMUniversity Press
- Choi, Undo, "NationalisMand Territorial Disputes", Northeast Asian History Issues, 49 (2011)
- 최운도, "Conditions for Peaceful Resolution in Territorial Disputes of Northeast Asia", 국제정치논총, 49(6), pp.35~53 (2009), 한국국제정치학회
- Gries, Peter Hays, "China’s New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy" (2005), University of California
- Han, Yong-seop, "Establishment of East Asian Community and Peacebuilding" (2010), Northeast Asian History Foundation
- Hong, Wan-seok, "A Study on the Perpetuation Factors of the Fourth Kuril Conflict", Journal of the Kore an Political Science Association, 36(2) (2002)
- Inoguchi, Takashi, "Japan and Asia after World War II", Quarterly Thoughts, 29 (1996)
- Jang, Duk-Jun, "Sino-Russia Relations and the Korean Peninsula" (2012), Hanul
- Jin, Chang-soo, "Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia and Japan's Foreign Policy" (2008), Sejong Institute
- Kang, Sang-Jung, "Japanese Studies, 11" (2009), Center for Japanese Studies, Korea University
- Kang, Sung-hak, "Political Economics of Siberia and Primorsky Territory" (2004), Leebuk
- Koh, Choong-seok, "Ieodo Maritime Dispute and Chinese Nationalism" (2013), Korea Research Information
- Kim, Ho-Seop, "A Study on the Japanese Right" (2000), Joong Ang
- Lee, Chang-wi, "The Territorial Dispute in Northeast Asia and Korea's Response Strategy: Focusing on the Southern Kuril Islands (4 Northern Provinces) and the Senkaku Islands (Tiaowitai)" (2006), Downsam
- Lee, Sang-myeon, "Proof of Dokdo Territory", Seoul National University Law, 42(4) (2001)
- "The Gando Convention and the Annexation of Korea and McCornac, Dennis, New Nationalism’ in Japan: A turn toward military normalization threatens Japan position as a peac eful international leader" (2014)[URL]
- Northeast Asian History Foundation, "Territorial Disputes and International Cooperation" (2014), Didimteo
- Northeast Asian History Foundation edition, "Status and Prospects of East Asian Community Discussion" (2009), Northeast Asian History Foundation
- Park, Gyeong-il, "Where Is the Fuse of Northeast Asian Security?" (2003), Korea Maritime Strategy Institute
- Shen, Grace Yen, "Unearthing the Nation: Modern Geology and NationalisMin Republican China" (2014), University of Chicago
- Shin, Yong-ha, "The Controversy over Dokdo Territory between Korea and Japan" (2003), Hanyang University Press
- Yun, Yeong-mi, "Territorial Dispute between Russia and Japan in the Post-Soviet Era: Focusing on the Yeltsin Era", Peace Study, 12(1) (2003)
- Yun, Yeong-m, "Korea and International Cooperation in the Global Era" (2011), Dunam
- 俵義文, "自由社版․育鵬社版教科書の採択をめざす右派勢力の動向", Northeast Asian History Founda tion Academic Conference (2011)
- 盛田昭夫, "NO(ノー)｣と言える日本新日米関係の方" (1989), 光文社