주요 공여국의 시민사회단체 협력사업 양태에 대한 탐색적 연구: 영국, 스웨덴, 일본을 중심으로
An Exploratory Study on State-CSOs Partnership in the Donor Countries: The cases of the U.K., Sweden and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 ‘목표지향적 개발협력’이 개시된 2000년대 이래 OECD/DAC 회원 공여국과 시민사회단체 간의 협력사업의 폭과 강도가 높아지는 것을 감안하여 영국, 스웨덴, 일본의 해당 협력사업을 정책 및 전략, 대상과 규모, 추진 방식, 모니터링과 평가의 틀로 분석했다. 결과적으로 스웨덴은 독립적 정책을 수립한 반면, 영국과 일본은 각각 운영수준의 전략과 보고서 형태로 방향성을 제시하고 있었다. 세 국가 모두 자국의 시민사회단체를 협력 대상으로 설정하고 있었으며, 특히 영국과 스웨덴은 개도국 시민사회단체도 협력 대상으로 포함하고 있었다. 추진 방식은 직접지원과 간접위탁지원 방식을 병행하되 세 국가 모두 후자의 비율이 높은 경향을 보여주고 있었으며, 특히 영국의 경우 최근 사업개편을 통한 혁신적 접근을 모색하고 있었다. 모니터링과 평가의 측면에서는 성과기반의 관리 방법을 도입하고, 사업단위 평가뿐만 아니라 3자 위탁 방식의 프로그램 평가를 통해 책무성과 투명성을 제고하고 있었다. 이러한 분석 결과를 토대로 현행 한국의 정부-시민사회 협력사업에 대해 제언하였다. 즉 독립적인 정책 수립, 개도국 시민사회를 포함하는 대상의 확대와 OECD/DAC 평균 수준으로 지원 규모의 단계적 증액, 지원 유형의 다양화, 지원 유형의 맥락에 따른 유연한 모니터링 및 평가 방안 도입의 필요성에 대해 언급했다.
Abstract
Since the era of goal-oriented development cooperation was initiated in 2000s, the extensity and intensity of cooperation between OECD/DAC donors and CSOs have been expanding. Accordingly, The paper aims to analyze three donors and CSO partnership - the UK, Sweden and Japan, represented in a group of Anglo, the Europe and the Asia respectively in the perspective of relevant policy or strategy, target and scale, type of implementation and monitoring and evaluation. As a result, Sweden has established an independent policy, whereas the UK and Japan have had strategies and reports at the operational level respectively. The UK and Sweden work with its domestic and international CSOs including civil society in developing countries. Three donors adapt combination of to CSOs and through CSOs, but the latter is much higher. More specifically, the UK has recently pursued an innovative approach through partnership restructuring. Result based monitoring and evaluation method is applied to both a project and a overall program level, commissioned by external evaluators, aiming to ensure accountability and transparency. Taken on these results into account, it suggests that KOICA should establish independent policies for partnership with CSOs including civil society in developing countries, increase the budget size to the average level of OECD / DAC in a long-term, diversify implementation types and finally foster flexibility of M&E, tailored to partnership context.
참고문헌 (42)
- 손혁상, "개발원조의 정부-NGO 파트너십 제도변화 연구: 네덜란드‘공동재원조성(Co-financing)프로그램’사례 분석을 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 48(1), pp.221~239 (2014), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- 손혁상, "국제개발협력에서 정부-시민사회 협력관계 연구: OECD DAC 회원국의 NGO지원정책 사례분석을 중심으로", 국가전략, 17(4), pp.105~136 (2011), 세종연구소
- 장현식, "OECD", DAC 회원국의 개발원조사업과 NGO와의 협력, 2001, pp.5(1), 49~66
- Bank, N, "NGOs, States and Donors Revisited: Still Too Close for Comfort", World Development, 66, pp.707~718 (2015)
- Charnovitz, S, "Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance", Michigan Journal of International Law, 18(2), pp.183~286 (1997)
- Clark, J, "Democratizing Development: the Role of Voluntary Organizations" (1991), Earthscan
- Clarke, G, "Nongovernmental Organizations and Politics in the Developing World", Political Studies, 46, pp.36~52 (1998)
- Houtzager, P, "Changing Paths: International Development and the New Politics of Inclusion", pp.1~31 (2005), University of Michigan Press
- Hulme, D, "NGOs, States and Donors" (1997), Macmillan
- Korten, D. C, "Getting to the 21st Century: Voluntary Action and the Global Agenda" (1990), Kumarian Press
- Lewis, D, "Development NGOs and Challenge of Partnership: Changing Relations between North and South", Social Policy & Administration, 32(5), pp.502~509 (1998)
- Lewis, D, "Non-Governmental Organizations and Development" (2009), Routlege
- Pinnington, R, "Local First in Practice: Unlocking the Power to Get Things Done" (2014), Peace Direct
- Riddell, R. C, "Does Foreign Aid Really Work" (2007), Oxford University Press
- 김채형, "OECD 회원국의 NGO 활동: 개발원조를 중심으로" (1992), 한국국제협력단
- 글로벌 CSR 프로그램 종합평가 보고서, "손혁상", 한국국제협력단, ~ (2014)
- 손혁상, "개발효과성 제고를 위한 정부-시민사회 협력 방안 연구" (2011), 한국국제협력단
- 이태주, "선진국 국제개발NGO의 활동과 우리나라 개발 NGO의 발전방향: 영국, 노르웨이, 스웨덴 개발NGO 원조정책과 사례 비교연구" (2004), 한국국제협력단
- BOND, "Towards a More Strategic Partnership between DFID and Civil Society" (2015), BOND
- DFID, "Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century" (1997), DFID
- DFID, "Eliminating World Poverty: Making Governace Work for the Poor" (2006), DFID
- DFID, "CSOs Partnership Review" (2016), DFID
- DFID, "Review of UK Aid Direct Funding Round 2 and the Lessons Learnt" (2017), DFID
- Hedman, J, "How DAC Members Work with Civil Society Organisations" (2011), OECD
- ICAI, "DFID’s Support for Civil Society Organisations through Programme Partnership Arrangements" (2013), ICAI
- InterAction, "A New Vision for the USAID-U.S. NGO Relationship: Partnering for Effective Development" (2012), InterAction
- JICA, "JICA Patnership Program: Toward Active Citizen Participation in International Cooperation" (2015), JICA
- JICA 2017: Annual Report, "JICA", JICA, ~ (2017)
- Karlstedt, C, "Evaluation of the Sida Funded Programme of Core Support and Connected Projects in Ukraine" (2015), SIDA
- MFA, "Strategy for Support via Swedish Civil Society Organisations for the Period 2010-2015" (2009), MFA
- MFA, "Strategy for Support via Swedish Civil Society Organisations for the Period 2016-2022" (2017), MFA
- MOFA, "International Cooperation and NGOs: Partnership between the Foreign Ministry of Japan and Japanese" (2014), MOFA
- NAO, "DFID: Working with Non-Governmental and other Civil Society Organisations to Promote Development" (2006), NAO
- OECD, "The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the Accra Agenda for Action", pp.2008, OECD
- OECD, "Partnering with Civil Society: 12 Lessons from DAC Peer Reviews", pp.2012, OECD
- or strategic partner organisations: Final Report Experiences and lessons learned from the organisational assessment programme 2012-14, "Organisational Assessments of Civil Society Organisations (CSO) in view of possible qualification as Sida’s framework and", pp.2014, SIPU International
- "개발협력연대"[URL]
- "GOV.UK"[URL]
- "Japan platform"[URL]
- "OECD Statistics"[URL]
- "Oxfam"[URL]
- "SIDA"[URL]