본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기술문서의 한일기계번역 문제에 대한 통제언어 연구 —‘-되다’ 구문의 기계번역수월성 제고를 위한 통제규칙

A Study of Controlled Language in Korean-Japanese Technical Document Translation —Control Rules For the Facilitation of Machine Translation Regarding ‘-되다’—

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Technical documents refer to documents produced for the purpose of recording knowledge or information in the area of education, science and technology. Translation of such documents becomes more and more important as their use and application keeps expanding along with globalization reaching readers of different languages. However, the structural ambiguity and vagueness found in such technical texts, as well as several other factors, hinder the comprehension, and therefore, the effective translation of technical documents, especially in the case of machine translations which are used for mass translation. Many errors appear in terms of style, lexicon, and grammar when machine translation is used for translating technical documents from Korean into Japanese. Among the 1,473 [되다] examples of syntax extracted from the Korean-into-Japanese technical document corpus, which is the subject of this study, errors(16.09%) have been found where [N-이/가 되다] syntaxes indicating ‘passive voice’ have been automatically translated into [N-になる] which indicate ‘a change of state’. A deeper inquiry into previous studies revealed that these errors were caused by a structural ambiguity lying at a grammatical layer where the [N-이/가 되다] syntax can imply both ‘a change of state’ as well as ‘passive voice’. This study proposes an approach that uses controlled language to avoid errors caused by polysemic and structural ambiguity of the [N-이/가 되다] syntax which are often found in Korean-Japanese machine translations. The controlled language approach aims to effectively control language from the initial stage of text production with the purpose of enhancing comprehensibility and the facilitation of machine translation. First, the distinct properties and characteristics of said syntax have been analyzed from reference studies to deduce formalized standards and values to resolve the ambiguity of [N-이/가 되다]. Second, controlled grammar and lexicon writing rules presented in previous studies have been considered or applied to form and implement a set of control rules that include writing rules and writing proscriptive rules. There should be follow-up studies to categorize errors found in various layers of style, lexicon, grammar that can affect the quality of Korean-Japanese machine translation and continuous research should be conducted regarding the cause-and-effect relationship in applying the rules of the controlled language to ensure that the rules function complementary to one another.

Abstract

Technical documents refer to documents produced for the purpose of recording knowledge or information in the area of education, science and technology. Translation of such documents becomes more and more important as their use and application keeps expanding along with globalization reaching readers of different languages. However, the structural ambiguity and vagueness found in such technical texts, as well as several other factors, hinder the comprehension, and therefore, the effective translation of technical documents, especially in the case of machine translations which are used for mass translation. Many errors appear in terms of style, lexicon, and grammar when machine translation is used for translating technical documents from Korean into Japanese. Among the 1,473 [되다] examples of syntax extracted from the Korean-into-Japanese technical document corpus, which is the subject of this study, errors(16.09%) have been found where [N-이/가 되다] syntaxes indicating ‘passive voice’ have been automatically translated into [N-になる] which indicate ‘a change of state’. A deeper inquiry into previous studies revealed that these errors were caused by a structural ambiguity lying at a grammatical layer where the [N-이/가 되다] syntax can imply both ‘a change of state’ as well as ‘passive voice’. This study proposes an approach that uses controlled language to avoid errors caused by polysemic and structural ambiguity of the [N-이/가 되다] syntax which are often found in Korean-Japanese machine translations. The controlled language approach aims to effectively control language from the initial stage of text production with the purpose of enhancing comprehensibility and the facilitation of machine translation. First, the distinct properties and characteristics of said syntax have been analyzed from reference studies to deduce formalized standards and values to resolve the ambiguity of [N-이/가 되다]. Second, controlled grammar and lexicon writing rules presented in previous studies have been considered or applied to form and implement a set of control rules that include writing rules and writing proscriptive rules. There should be follow-up studies to categorize errors found in various layers of style, lexicon, grammar that can affect the quality of Korean-Japanese machine translation and continuous research should be conducted regarding the cause-and-effect relationship in applying the rules of the controlled language to ensure that the rules function complementary to one another.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. 권민재, "기술 커뮤니케이션과 통제언어 - 통제언어의 개발 사례 및 특성을 중심으로 -", 독어학, (17), pp.45~68 (2008), 한국독어학회
  2. 기타무라 다다시, "보조용언의 판별 기준에 대한 고찰", 한국어교육, 9(1), pp.201~218 (1999)
  3. 기타무라 다다시, "‘동사성 명사+되-’구성의 ‘되-’에 대한 경동사적 접근", 형태론, 2(2) (2000)
  4. 기타무라 다다시, "한국어 피동 표현 연구" (2004), J&C
  5. 김경아, "독일어 기술문서의 가독성 향상 방안 연구-통제언어이론을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
  6. 김동식, "동사 되다의 연구", 국어국문학, 92, pp.395~420 (1984)
  7. 김문오, "제품설명서의 문장실태연구1" (2002), 국립국어연구원
  8. 김문오, "제품설명서의 문장실태연구2" (2003), 국립국어연구원
  9. 김석득, "시킴(사동)법과 입음(피동)법", 국어생활, 8, pp.89~103 (1987)
  10. 김진섭, "동사 ‘되-’에 관하여", 어문학 교육, 19, pp.93~114 (1997)
  11. 김한식, "한일 통역과 번역" (2003), 한국문화사
  12. 김한식, "가독성의 요인별 표현 분석을 통한 번역전략 연구-한일 기사문을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2010
  13. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1991), 탑출판사
  14. 남영복, "‘X가 Y니 나루(XがYになる)’구문과 ‘X가 Y가 되다’구문의 대조연구", 일어일문학연구, 32(1), pp.117~143 (1998)
  15. 두산동아편집국, "프라임 일한사전" (2009), 두산동아
  16. 류수린, "통제언어 모형개발의 필요성과 방향 - 기술문서에서 나타난 한국어 표현을 중심으로 -", 독어학, (17), pp.69~95 (2008), 한국독어학회
  17. 류수린, "인지언어학적 명제분석과 기술문서의 가독성", 독어학, (20), pp.61~86 (2009), 한국독어학회
  18. 류수린, "한국어 기술문서의 번역성 제고를 위한 다중주어의 통제", 독어문학, 114, pp.181~204 (2010)
  19. 박성종, "국어 피동 연구", 석사, pp.1984
  20. 배희임, "국어 피동 연구" (1988), 고려대학교 민족문화연구소
  21. 손동주, "‘なる’와 ‘되다’의 의미 확장과 자동성과의 관계", 동북아 문화연구, 1(17), pp.401~415 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
  22. 서승현, "국어의 형태 통사적 구성에 관한 연구" (2002), 보고사
  23. 서정수, "동사 ‘하-’의 기능", 국어국문학, 68, pp.262~265 (1975)
  24. 서정수, "동사 ‘되-’에 관하여", 동방학지, 71, pp.173~204 (1991)
  25. 서정수, "국어문법" (2006), 뿌리깊은 나무
  26. 성광수, "국어 간접피동에 대하여", 문법연구, 3 (1976), 문법연구회
  27. 송현정, "국어피동담화특성연구", 先淸語文, 22 (1994)
  28. 安平鎬, "能格性(Ergativity)에 관한 韓日對照硏究―「VN하다」와 「VNする(suru)」를 中心으로―", 일본학보, 66(0), pp.79~90 (2006), 한국일본학회
  29. 양정석, "이중주어문과 이중목적어문에 대하여", 연세어문학, 20, pp.255~318 (1987)
  30. 오인희, "글로벌 커뮤니케이션을 위한 픽토그램(Pictogram)의 활용성 연구: 사용설명서의 ‘안전한 사용’ 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
  31. 우인혜, "국어의 피동법과 피동표현의 연구", 박사, pp.1993
  32. 이기동, "동사 되다의 의미분석", 동방학지, 71, pp.205~231 (1991)
  33. 이선희, "복합술어 구문 연구", 석사, pp.1993
  34. 이성규, "한일 양언어의 수동문의 대조적 고찰" (2001), 불이문화
  35. 이성규, "일본어 조동사 연구 I" (2004), 불이문화
  36. 이은미, "なる‘와 ‘되다’의 통사 구조", 한국일본어문학회 학술발표대회논문집, pp.30~35 (2003)
  37. 이정택, "용언 ‘되다’와 피동법", 한글, 218, pp.89~118 (1992)
  38. 이정택, "피동성 표현에 관한 연구 - ‘되다, 받다, 당하다’를 대상으로", 한글, 251, pp.143~166 (2001)
  39. 이향천, "피동의 의미와 기원", 박사, pp.1990
  40. 임홍빈, "피동성과 피동구문", 국민대학교 논문집, 12(1), pp.35~60 (1977)
  41. 임병화, "기술문서의 조건 부사어 통제1) - 번역성 제고 방안을 중심으로 -", 독어학, (20), pp.217~243 (2009), 한국독어학회
  42. 임인숙, "동사 되다의 의미 연구", 석사, pp.1993
  43. 최지영, "통제언어의 관점에서 본 기술문서의 화행표현", 독어학, (17), pp.351~380 (2008), 한국독어학회
  44. 최지영, "기술문서 3항술어구문의 어순 - 통제언어의 관점에서", 독일문학, 50(3), pp.320~346 (2009), 한국독어독문학회
  45. 최현배, "우리말본" (1961), 정음문화사
  46. 홍문표, "번역수월성의 관점에서 본 통제독일어, 통제영어, 통제한국어의 비교연구", 독일문학, 49(3), pp.286~308 (2008), 한국독어독문학회
  47. 홍우평, "문서 가독성의 제고를 위한 언어학적 제약* - 테마-레마 원리를 중심으로 -", 독어학, (19), pp.1~21 (2009), 한국독어학회
  48. 홍재성, "동사 먹다의 사전적 처리를 위한 몇 가지 논의", 새국어생활, 2(4), pp.14~37 (1992)
  49. Aikawa, "Impact of controlled language on translation quality and post-editing in a statistical machine translation environment", Proceedings of MT Summit, 통권 : 11, pp.1~7 (2007)
  50. Bernth, Arendse, "Easy English Analyzer-Taking controlled language from sentence to discourse level", Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Controlled Language Applications (2006)
  51. Farrington, Gordon, "AECMA Simplified English, An Overview of the International Aerospace Maintenance Language", Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Controlled Language Applications, pp.1~21 (1996)
  52. Godden, Kurt, "Controlling the Business Environment for Controlled Language", Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Controlled Language Application, pp.185~190 (1998)
  53. Göpferich, Susanne, "Textproduktion im Zeitalter der Globalisierung: Entwicklung einer Didaktik des Wissenstransfers" (2006), Stauffenburg
  54. Jackendoff, Ray, "A Deep Structure Projection Rule", Linguistic Inquiry, 5(4), pp.481~505 (1974)
  55. Klare, George R., "Handbook of reading research" (1984), Longman
  56. Lehrndorfer, Anne, "Kontrolliertes Deutsch. Linguistische und sprachtypologische Leitlinien für eine (maschinell) kontrollierte Sprache in der technischen Dokumentatio" (1996), Narr
  57. Ley, Martin, "Kontrollierte Textstrukturen: Ein (linguistisches) Informationsmodell für die Technische Kommunikation", 박사, pp.2005
  58. Lyons, John, "Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics" (1968), Cambridge U. P.
  59. Mitamura, Teruko, "Automatic rewriting for controlled language translation", Proceedings of NLPRS-2001, pp.101~12 (2001)
  60. Rechenberg, Peter, "Technisches Schreiben-für Informatiker" (2006), Hanser
  61. Schwitter, Rolf, "Kontrolliertes Englisch-für Anforderungsspezifikationen", 박사, pp.1998
  62. Shubert, Serena K., "The Comprehensibility of Simplified English in Procedures", Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25(4), pp.347~369 (1995)
  63. Smart, John M, "SMART Controlled English", Proceedings of CLAW, pp.1~9 (2006)
  64. 生越直樹, "日本語漢語動詞における能動と受動-朝鮮語動詞との對照", 日本語敎育, 48, pp.53~65 (1982)
  65. 久野章, "新日本文法硏究" (1983), 大修館書店
  66. 坂田雪子, "日本文法大辭典" (1982), 明治書院
  67. 菅井綾子, "ことになるについて", 일본어문학, 14, pp.51~64 (2001)
  68. 辻村敏樹, "敬語の史的硏究-お-になる考" (1968), 東京堂出版
  69. 寺村秀夫, "日本語のシンタクスと意味Ⅰ" (1984), くろしお出版
  70. 寺村秀夫, "ナル表現とスル表現 寺村秀夫論文集Ⅱ" (1993), くろしお出版
  71. 新村出, "廣辭苑 第六版" (2008), 岩波書店
  72. 裵德姬, "‘되다’と‘なる’について", 상명대학교논문집, 24, pp.153~174 (1989)
  73. 許明子, "日本語と韓國語の受身文の對照硏究東京" (2004), ひつじ書房
  74. 松尾捨次郞, "國語法論攷" (1961), 白帝社
  75. 三上章, "現代語法諸說" (1972), くろしお出版

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)