혼인의사와 혼인무효에 대한 재고
Intent to marry and Annulment
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The marriage system in Korea is grounded on a report of marriage. On that account, the completion is formed by marital agreement between two parties and marriage registration. Article 815 Issue 1 of the Civil code describes no consent to marriage as one of the reasons for annulment. Defining what the intent to marriage is has been controversial. The majority and precedents favor essential intent. However, it is advisable to understand the intent to marriage as a combination of effective intent and declaratory intent to build a substantially-married couple. Marriage should be monogamous. Same-sex marriage is not acknowledged by the Civil code of Korea, so same-sex marriage is invalid. However, opinions saying that same-sex marriage should be protected like different-sex marriage are gaining territory from the standpoint of the freedom of marriage and of the protection of minority rights. It is an issue whether a marriage with grounds for annulment is supposedly invalid, or is invalid only when a judicial decision is sentenced. The majority and precedents favor supposed invalidity. Annulment has effects on various legal relations, and there are several cases when annulments are not clear. Therefore, deciding invalidity by a judicial sentence is desirable.
Abstract
The marriage system in Korea is grounded on a report of marriage. On that account, the completion is formed by marital agreement between two parties and marriage registration. Article 815 Issue 1 of the Civil code describes no consent to marriage as one of the reasons for annulment. Defining what the intent to marriage is has been controversial. The majority and precedents favor essential intent. However, it is advisable to understand the intent to marriage as a combination of effective intent and declaratory intent to build a substantially-married couple. Marriage should be monogamous. Same-sex marriage is not acknowledged by the Civil code of Korea, so same-sex marriage is invalid. However, opinions saying that same-sex marriage should be protected like different-sex marriage are gaining territory from the standpoint of the freedom of marriage and of the protection of minority rights. It is an issue whether a marriage with grounds for annulment is supposedly invalid, or is invalid only when a judicial decision is sentenced. The majority and precedents favor supposed invalidity. Annulment has effects on various legal relations, and there are several cases when annulments are not clear. Therefore, deciding invalidity by a judicial sentence is desirable.
참고문헌 (23)
- "민법총칙, 제7판" (2007), 박영사
- "판례회고 민법 (친족·상속편 )" (1976), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- , 2006, ~, pp.제일법규
- "민법강의 하" (2007), 박영사
- "가족법 친족법·가족법" (2006), 법원사
- "신민사소송법" (2004), 박영사
- "한국가족법연구" (1967), 서울대학교출판부
- "민법강의 제5판" (2007), 홍문사
- "“혼인의 합의와 무효행위의 추인”", (164) (1984)
- "혼인의사와 혼인신고", (13) (1999)
- "가장혼인의 효력" (1991)
- "혼인의사 가장혼인을 중심으로" (2002), 서울가정법원
- "혼인성립에 관한 민법의 개정방향", 15(1) (2001)
- "무효혼과 호적정정" (1964)
- "혼인의사와 신고", (10) (1996)
- "“혼인무효에 관한 약간의 고찰-혼인의사를 중심으로-”" (1988)
- "Family Law 4th Ed" (2003)
- "Familienrecht, 27. Aufl" (1999)
- "Familienrecht nach Anspruchsgrundlagen samt Verfahren in Familien - Kinderschafts- und Betreuungssachen" (2004)
- "Das Neue Famlilienrecht" (1998)
- "Familienrecht, 10. Aufl" (1999)
- "Familienrecht, 14. Aufl" (2006)
- "Eingetragene Lebenspartnerschaft - Ein Überblick FamRZ" (2001)
