혼인신고에서의 쌍방출석주의와 공증 ―제도 도입의 필요성과 예외의 설정을 중심으로―
A Requirement of the Attendance for Marriage Registration and Notarization
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean Act on Registration of Family Relationship does not require both parties wishing to marry to attend before Family Relationship Registration officers when they report marriage, so that there is no way for officers to confirm their intention of marriage at the time of marriage registration. As a result, not a few of marriages are reported against his/her own will. The reason for not requiring the attendance of the parties was to settle the marriage report system in time, however it is no longer suitable. Considering the long tradition of common law marriage in Korean society, the Supreme Court has held that the marriage report is valid even though the other party has never given the consent to the report if they has been playing their role as a husband and wife in reality. But the number of people who deliberately do not report marriage is increasing, because they do not want to enjoy the effect of marriage even if they are in a de facto marriage relationship. In such a situation, the current law may infringe the freedom of not-to-marry. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to revise the Act to require both parties to attend for marriage report and to be screened their intention of marriage by officers, or submit an affidavit by notary if they can not attend by reason of detention, military service, hospitalization or inability to act due to old age, disease, etc.
Abstract
The Korean Act on Registration of Family Relationship does not require both parties wishing to marry to attend before Family Relationship Registration officers when they report marriage, so that there is no way for officers to confirm their intention of marriage at the time of marriage registration. As a result, not a few of marriages are reported against his/her own will. The reason for not requiring the attendance of the parties was to settle the marriage report system in time, however it is no longer suitable. Considering the long tradition of common law marriage in Korean society, the Supreme Court has held that the marriage report is valid even though the other party has never given the consent to the report if they has been playing their role as a husband and wife in reality. But the number of people who deliberately do not report marriage is increasing, because they do not want to enjoy the effect of marriage even if they are in a de facto marriage relationship. In such a situation, the current law may infringe the freedom of not-to-marry. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to revise the Act to require both parties to attend for marriage report and to be screened their intention of marriage by officers, or submit an affidavit by notary if they can not attend by reason of detention, military service, hospitalization or inability to act due to old age, disease, etc.
참고문헌 (19)
- 金容漢, "親族相續法論" (2003), 博英社
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2017), 法文社
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
- 朴正基, "家族法: 親族相續法" (2013), 三英社
- 裵慶淑, "親族相續法講義: 家族財産法" (2006), 第一法規
- 이경희, "가족법" (2013), 法元社
- 鄭光鉉, "韓國家族法硏究" (1967), 서울大學校 出版部
- "親族相續에 관한 舊慣習", 裁判資料, (29) (1985), 法院行政處
- 2015, , ~
- 한봉희, "가족법" (2013), 三英社
- 김영신, "“혼인의사”의 의미에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 36(4), pp.331~350 (2012), 법학연구소
- 박희호, "혼인의 성립요건에 대한 소고", 가족법연구, 25(1), pp.1~28 (2011), 한국가족법학회
- 이화숙, "가족법상의 법률행위에 있어서의 의사와 신고", 민사법학, (36), pp.613~644 (2007), 한국민사법학회
- 정광현, "혼인신고의 강제이행문제", 법정 (1963)
- 조미경, "혼인의사와 신고", 家族法硏究, (10) (1996)
- 한국가정법률상담소, "한국가정법률상담소 성년후견 상담 분석", 한국가정법률상담소 심포지엄 I: 성년후견 신탁의 필요성과 과제(2017.3.16) 자료집 (2017)
- Cretney, Stephen, "Family Law in the Twentieth Century : A History" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Katz, Sanford N., "Family Law in America" (2015), Oxford University Press
- 大村敦志, "家族法" (2010), 有斐閣
