본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혼인의사의 합치에 대한 재평가

Reassessment of Agreement to Marry

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This paper examines the agreement to marry from a new perspective as follows. The intention to marry refers to the intention of effect that desires the effects that occur in legal marriage relationships, and this is a requirement for the effect of marriage. However, the agreement to marry is not made through reporting. In other words, marriage reporting is a separate requirement for the formation of legal marriage, and it is not a method of declaring intention. Therefore, the intention to report is not included in the intention to marry, and even if the intention to report is lacking, marriage is formed as long as marriage reporting is made. This is because the requirement for the formation of marriage is marriage reporting, not the intention to report. Furthermore, after the formation of marriage, the validity or invalidity of marriage depends on the presence of the intention of effect. There may be concerns about leaving the issue of unilateral marriage reporting unresolved due to the absence of the requirement for intention to report, but this is a problem that should be addressed by supplementing the procedure for marriage reporting. Under the legal marriage system, if the true intention of the parties regarding the effects of legal marriage exists and the requirement for marriage reporting is met, a valid marriage should be allowed. In addition, it is more desirable to consider legislatively recognizing juristic acts in various spectrum similar to marriage, rather than broadly allowing de facto marital relations, in order to address the issue that allowing marriage reporting without the requirement for intention to report can reduce the possibility of existence.

Abstract

This paper examines the agreement to marry from a new perspective as follows. The intention to marry refers to the intention of effect that desires the effects that occur in legal marriage relationships, and this is a requirement for the effect of marriage. However, the agreement to marry is not made through reporting. In other words, marriage reporting is a separate requirement for the formation of legal marriage, and it is not a method of declaring intention. Therefore, the intention to report is not included in the intention to marry, and even if the intention to report is lacking, marriage is formed as long as marriage reporting is made. This is because the requirement for the formation of marriage is marriage reporting, not the intention to report. Furthermore, after the formation of marriage, the validity or invalidity of marriage depends on the presence of the intention of effect. There may be concerns about leaving the issue of unilateral marriage reporting unresolved due to the absence of the requirement for intention to report, but this is a problem that should be addressed by supplementing the procedure for marriage reporting. Under the legal marriage system, if the true intention of the parties regarding the effects of legal marriage exists and the requirement for marriage reporting is met, a valid marriage should be allowed. In addition, it is more desirable to consider legislatively recognizing juristic acts in various spectrum similar to marriage, rather than broadly allowing de facto marital relations, in order to address the issue that allowing marriage reporting without the requirement for intention to report can reduce the possibility of existence.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 곽윤직, "민법총칙" (2016), 박영사
  2. 김상용, "민법총칙" (2009), 화산미디어
  3. 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2020), 법문사
  4. 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2020), 박영사
  5. 박병호, "가족법" (1999), 한국방송통신대학
  6. 송덕수, "민법총칙" (2021), 박영사
  7. 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2020), 박영사
  8. 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2020), 박영사
  9. 정광현, "한국가족법연구" (1967), 서울대학교출판부
  10. 지원림, "민법강의" (2020), 홍문사
  11. 窪田充見, "家族法" (2019), 有斐閣
  12. 김계순, "혼인의사와 혼인무효에 대한 재고", 중앙법학, 9(4), pp.45~67 (2007), 중앙법학회[DOI]
  13. 김영신, "“혼인의사”의 의미에 관한 고찰", 외법논집, 36(4), pp.331~350 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
  14. 박희호, "혼인의 성립요건에 대한 소고", 가족법연구, 25(1), pp.1~28 (2011), 한국가족법학회
  15. 이화숙, "家族法上 法律行爲에 있어 意思와 申告", 민사법학, (36) (2007), 한국민사법학회
  16. 전원열, "혼인신고에서의 쌍방출석주의와 공증 ―제도 도입의 필요성과 예외의 설정을 중심으로―", 가족법연구, 31(3), pp.1~36 (2017), 한국가족법학회[DOI]
  17. 조미경, "혼인의사와 신고", 가족법연구, (10) (1996), 한국가족법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)