전문통역사 머릿속 사전의 구조 —통합어에 대한 경험연구—
Syntagma in professional interpreters' mental lexicon
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at verifying the following three hypotheses on syntagma in interpreters' mental lexicon: 1) Interpreters' syntagmatic connections of words are stronger and more typical than non-interpreters, 2) Interpreters' competence in syntagma lies more in the semantic adequacy than in the grammatical accuracy, 3) Their competence in syntagma is more visible on a textual level. 12 expert interpreters, 27 interpreter trainees, 17 undergraduates were subjected to three sets of cloze test (phrase, sentence, text). It was expected that experts produce more typical and semantically correct answers, especially on a textual level. As a result, only first hypothesis was partly confirmed and the group difference was statistically not significant. This result(minor group difference) can be ascribed to the experiment language (subjects' mother tongue in common) and the modality of the test, i.e. lexical test, which is favorable for younger groups. This leads to the conclusion, the major difference between interpreters and non-interpreters in their mental lexicon lies more in paradigmatic than in syntagmatic structure. Finally, some suggestions are made for the subsequent researches on syntagmatic structure of mental lexicon.
Abstract
This study aims at verifying the following three hypotheses on syntagma in interpreters' mental lexicon: 1) Interpreters' syntagmatic connections of words are stronger and more typical than non-interpreters, 2) Interpreters' competence in syntagma lies more in the semantic adequacy than in the grammatical accuracy, 3) Their competence in syntagma is more visible on a textual level. 12 expert interpreters, 27 interpreter trainees, 17 undergraduates were subjected to three sets of cloze test (phrase, sentence, text). It was expected that experts produce more typical and semantically correct answers, especially on a textual level. As a result, only first hypothesis was partly confirmed and the group difference was statistically not significant. This result(minor group difference) can be ascribed to the experiment language (subjects' mother tongue in common) and the modality of the test, i.e. lexical test, which is favorable for younger groups. This leads to the conclusion, the major difference between interpreters and non-interpreters in their mental lexicon lies more in paradigmatic than in syntagmatic structure. Finally, some suggestions are made for the subsequent researches on syntagmatic structure of mental lexicon.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김정우, "영어 복수 표현의 한국어 번역에 관한 종합적 고찰", 번역학연구, 14(4), pp.61~90 (2013), 한국번역학회
- 김종도, "인지문법의 디딤돌" (2002), 도서출판 박이정
- 박노철, "한글 킹제임스(KJV) 성경 번역의 문제점:연어", 문법, 번역학연구, pp.2005, 6(2)[DOI]
- 박순봉, "중원 고구려비 영문안내판의 문법적 오류", 번역학연구, 10(3), pp.99~119 (2009), 한국번역학회
- 정혜연, "패러프레이즈 능력과 통역 전문성의 연관성", 번역학연구, 17(2), pp.119~140 (2016), 한국번역학회
- 한국외대 번역평가인증 연구팀, "번역인증제도(실무편)", 한국외대 통번역연구소 학술대회 <언어, 통번역의 평가 및 인증> 발표집, pp.23~33 (2016)
- 한영균, "학습용 기본명사 연어빈도사전" (2016), 한국문화사
- Aitchison, Jean, "Words in the Mind(언어와 마음)" (2004), 도서출판 역락
- Bajo, Maria Teresa, "Translation in context", pp.127~142 (2000), John Benjamins
- Chabasse, Catherine, "Putting interpreting admissions exams to the test", Interpreting, 16(1), pp.19~33 (2014)
- Chincotta, Dino, "Non temporal determinants of bilingual memory capacity: The role of long-term representations and fluency", Bilingualism : Language and Cognition, 1, pp.117~130 (1998)
- Cremer, Marjolein, "Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations", International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), pp.187~204 (2010)
- Ervin, Susan Moore, "Changes with Ages in the Verbal Determinants of Word-Association", The American Journal of Psychology, 74(3), pp.361~372 (1961)
- Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl, "Handbook of Bilingualism", pp.268~284 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Gerver, David, "Selection Tests for Trainee Conference Interpreters", Meta, 34(4), pp.724~735 (1989)
- Kandel, Eric, "In Search of Memory(기억을 찾아서)" (2009), 랜덤하우스 코리아
- Köpke, Barbara, "Working memory performance in expert and novice interpreters", Interpreting, 8(1), pp.1~23 (2006)
- Köpke, Barbara, "Methodological aspects of working memory assessment in simultaneous interpreters", International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), pp.183~197 (2011)
- Kurz, Ingrid, "Simultandolmetschen als Gegenstand der interdisziplinären Forschung" (1996), WUV-Universitätsverlag
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Foundation of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1" (1987), Standford University Press
- Liu Minhua, "Working memory and expertise in simultaneous interpreting", Interpreting, 6(1), pp.19~42 (2004)
- Meara, Paul, "Competence and performance in language learning", pp.35~53 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Mizuno, Akira, "Process Model for Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory", Meta, 50(2), pp.739~752 (2005)
- Namei, Shidrokh, "Bilingual lexical development: A Persian-Swedish word association study", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), pp.363~388 (2004)
- Nissen, Henriette, "Word class influence on word association test results", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), pp.389~408 (2006)
- Pavlenko, Aneta, "The Bilingual Mental Lexicon: Interdisciplinary Approaches" (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Pöchhacker, Franz, "Assessing aptitude for interpreting - The SynCloze test", Interpreting, 13(1), pp.106~120 (2011)
- Russo, Mariachiara, "Testing aptitude for interpreting", Interpreting, 16(1), pp.1~18 (2014)
- Saussure, Ferdinand, "Cours de linguistique générale(일반언어학 강의)" (2010), 민음사
- Wray, Alison, "Formulaic languages and the lexicon" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Zareva, Alla, "The ‘promise’ of three methods of word association analysis to L2 lexical research", Second Language Research, 28(1), pp.41~67 (2012)