재번역을 재고하다: 결여 패러다임에서 다양성 패러다임으로
Rethinking Retranslation: From Paradigm of Lack Towards Paradigm of Multiplicity
1
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims at exploring retranslation phenomenon and questioning the notions of lack behind it. This paradigm of lack, which assumes that retranslation stems from a weakness, deficiency, and inadequacy in previous translations or in the source text, is based on the Retranslation Hypothesis. One of the alternatives of paradigm of lack is norms/ideology approach, which implies conditioning by large social forces. Although it is a powerful approach, it could neglect specific contextual circumstances and complexities due to the emphasis on dominant broad social patterns. The study of retranslation must be open to the possibility of more than one translation being undertaken during one time period. Literary text is open-ended and thus lend themselves to multiple interpretations. Fundamentally, every translation can be considered to be an interpretation and every translator an interpreter. This interpretative approach shows creativity and cognitive complexity that impel translation and retranslation, and allows and respects multiple translations. Unless we rethink the posture of judging the translation or retranslation and finding its defects and deficiencies, we will continue to be deaf to the decisive role of retranslations in actualizing the afterlife of literary texts. Thus, moving from the paradigm of lack towards the paradigm of multiplicity is a must in rethinking retranslation.
Abstract
This study aims at exploring retranslation phenomenon and questioning the notions of lack behind it. This paradigm of lack, which assumes that retranslation stems from a weakness, deficiency, and inadequacy in previous translations or in the source text, is based on the Retranslation Hypothesis. One of the alternatives of paradigm of lack is norms/ideology approach, which implies conditioning by large social forces. Although it is a powerful approach, it could neglect specific contextual circumstances and complexities due to the emphasis on dominant broad social patterns. The study of retranslation must be open to the possibility of more than one translation being undertaken during one time period. Literary text is open-ended and thus lend themselves to multiple interpretations. Fundamentally, every translation can be considered to be an interpretation and every translator an interpreter. This interpretative approach shows creativity and cognitive complexity that impel translation and retranslation, and allows and respects multiple translations. Unless we rethink the posture of judging the translation or retranslation and finding its defects and deficiencies, we will continue to be deaf to the decisive role of retranslations in actualizing the afterlife of literary texts. Thus, moving from the paradigm of lack towards the paradigm of multiplicity is a must in rethinking retranslation.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김도훈, "펄 벅의 <대지> 재번역 양상에 대한 소고", 통번역학연구, 18(2), pp.1~14 (2014), 통번역연구소
- 윤선경, "시와 번역―창조적인 번역의 의의", 현대영미시연구, 21(1), pp.137~155 (2015), 한국현대영미시학회
- 임순정, "고전 문학 작품의 재번역 양상: 스탕달의 『적과 흑』을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 11(2), pp.127~149 (2010), 한국번역학회
- Barthes, Roland., "The Death of the Author, Image, Music and Text", pp.142~148 (1977), Fontana
- Bassnett, Susan., "Constructing cultures: Essays on literary translation", pp.57~75 (1998), Multilingual Matters
- Bassnett, Susan., "The Translator as Writer", pp.173~183 (2006), Continuum
- Benjamin, Andrew., "Walter Benjamin and The Task of the Translator, Translation and the Nature of Philosophy" (1989), Routledge
- Benjamin, Walter., "Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays from Dryden to Derrida", pp.71~82 (1992), U of Chicago
- Bensimon, Paul., "Presentation", Palimpsestes, 13(4), pp.ix~xiii (1990)
- Berman, Antoine, "La Retraduction comme espace de traduction", Palimpsestes, 13(4), pp.1~7 (1990)
- Brisset, Annie., "Retraduire ou le corps changeant de la connaissance. Sur l’historicite de la traduction", Palimpsestes, 15, pp.39~67 (2004)
- Brownlie, Siobahn, "Narrative Theory and Retranslation Theory", Across Languages and Cultures, 7(2), pp.145~170 (2006)
- Chesterman, Andrew., "Intercultural Faultlines", pp.15~28 (2000), St Jerome
- Culler, Jonathan, "Introduction : Critical Paradigms", PMLA, 125(4), pp.905~915 (2010)
- Deane, Sharon Louise, "Confronting the retranslation hypothesis: Flaubert and Sand in the British literary system", PhD, pp.2011
- Derrida, Jacques, "Position" (1982), U of Chicago P
- Derrida, Jacques., "Acts of Literature", pp.33~75 (1992), Routledge
- Giddens, Anthony., "Central Problems in Social Theory : Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis" (1979), U of California P
- 한미애, "Retranslation Hypotheses and Three Korean Translations of The Martyred", 번역학연구, 15(4), pp.29~59 (2014), 한국번역학회
- Massardier-Kenney, Françoise, "Toward a Rethinking of Retranslation", Translation Review, 92(1), pp.73~85 (2015)
- Paloposki, Outi, "A thousand and one translations : Revisiting retranslation", BENJAMINS TRANSLATION LIBRARY, 50, pp.27~38 (2004)
- Paloposki, Outi, "Reprocessing texts. The fine line between retranslating and revising", Across Languages and Cultures, 11(1), pp.29~49 (2010)
- Rodriguez, Liliane, "Sous le signe de Mercure, la retraduction", Palimpsestes, 4, pp.63~80 (1990)
- Rutherford, John., "Translating Fun: Don Quixote", pp.71~83 (2006), The Translator as Writer
- Stam, Robert., "Film adaptation", pp.54~76 (2000), The Athlone Press
- Susam-Sarajeva, Şebnem., "Theories on the move: translation's role in the travels of literary theories, No. 27" (2006), Rodopi
- Vanderschelden, Isabelle., "On Translating French Literature and Film II", pp.1~18 (2000), Rudopi
- Venuti, Lawrence., "The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference" (1998), Taylor & Francis US
- Venuti, Lawrence, "Retranslations : The creation of value", Bucknell Review, 47(1), pp.25~38 (2004)
- "David Luke - Oxford German don and translator of Goethe, Kleist, Thomas Mann and the Brothers Grimm" (2005)[URL]