본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제법상 결정적 기일의 분석 및 검토 - 이론과 쟁점, 독도 영유권과의 관련성을 중심으로 -

Analysis and Assessment of the "Critical Date Doctrine" under International Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

International courts use the concept of ‘critical date' in the process of settling territorial disputes. Though the concept and theory of 'critical date' is introduced a long time ago and widely employed in international law, scholars dispute over whether it is only a judicial technique or an established principle of law. At any rate, since international courts, including International Court of Justice(ICJ) and its predecessor, namely, Permanent Court of International Justice(PCIJ), solve territorial disputes by setting up critical dates in many cases submitted to them, we have no choice but to examine the concept, function, some standards of critical date and the attitudes of international courts toward its doctrine. In relation to this work, it is also necessary to consider the possibility of establishing two or more critical dates or critical period in the same territorial dispute and its influence upon the issue of territorial sovereignty over Dokdo. Through these important undertakings, we could manage the Dokdo diplomacy in a more consistent, proactive and strategic way.

Abstract

International courts use the concept of ‘critical date' in the process of settling territorial disputes. Though the concept and theory of 'critical date' is introduced a long time ago and widely employed in international law, scholars dispute over whether it is only a judicial technique or an established principle of law. At any rate, since international courts, including International Court of Justice(ICJ) and its predecessor, namely, Permanent Court of International Justice(PCIJ), solve territorial disputes by setting up critical dates in many cases submitted to them, we have no choice but to examine the concept, function, some standards of critical date and the attitudes of international courts toward its doctrine. In relation to this work, it is also necessary to consider the possibility of establishing two or more critical dates or critical period in the same territorial dispute and its influence upon the issue of territorial sovereignty over Dokdo. Through these important undertakings, we could manage the Dokdo diplomacy in a more consistent, proactive and strategic way.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 배타적경제수역 선포와 광역관리체제에 관한 연구(Ⅱ), "권문상", 한국해양수산개발원, ~, pp.1997-03 (1997)
  2. 김대순, "『국제법론』, 제15판" (2010), 삼영사
  3. 김명기, "독도와 국제법" (1987), 화학사
  4. 김명기, "독도강의. in: 대한민국 영토연구총서 Ⅳ" (2007), 책과 사람들
  5. 김학준, "독도는 우리땅: 독도의 어제, 오늘, 그리고 내일" (1996), 한줄기
  6. 이석용, "국제해양분쟁해결" (2007), 글누리
  7. 이한기, "한국의 영토 - 영토취득에 관한 국제법적 연구" (1969), 서울대학교 출판부
  8. 외무부, "독도관계 자료집(Ⅰ) -왕복외교문서(1952~76)" (1977), 외무부
  9. 독도영유권에 관한 국제법적 쟁점 연구, "정갑용", 한국해양수산개발원, ~, pp.2004-25 (2004)
  10. 정인섭, "신국제법강의 - 이론과 사례" (2010), 박영사
  11. 山本草二, "國際法" (1994), 有斐閣
  12. 김명기, "대일평화조약 제2조의 해석과 Critical Date", 독도논총, (2) (2006), 독도조사연구학회
  13. 김명기, "대일평화조약상 독도의 영유권과 uti possidetis 원칙", 외교, (81) (2007)
  14. 김영원, "말레이시아-싱가포르간 도서영유권 분쟁에 대한 ICJ의 판결(2008.5.23) 분석과 독도문제에 대한 시사점", 외교, (86) (2008)
  15. 김용환, "페드라 브랑카, 미들락스 및 사우스레지의 영유권에 관한 ICJ 판례 분석", 국제법학회논총, 53(2), pp.11~30 (2008), 대한국제법학회
  16. 김용환, "ICJ 흑해 해양경계획정 판결의 주요 쟁점 및 시사점", 국제법학회논총, 54(2), pp.229~252 (2009), 대한국제법학회
  17. 김정균, "中井養三郞의 소위 「독도편입 및 대하청원」에 관한 연구", 법학회논총, 27(2) (1982)
  18. 박기갑, "국제법상 CRITICAL DATE 설정문제에 관한 연구", 국제법학회논총, 43(2) (1998)
  19. 박춘호, "독도영유권문제와 국제법", 영원한 친구들(Lasting Friends), (94) (2004), 한미우호협회
  20. 서철원, "니카라구아와 온두라스간의 해양경계사건 분석", 국제법학회논총, 53(2), pp.237~261 (2008), 대한국제법학회
  21. 신각수, "결정적 시점의 이론", 국제법학회논총, 32(2) (1987)
  22. 이중범, "독도에 대한 ‘島根縣告示 제40호’의 문제점", 국제법협회논총, 2 (1986)
  23. 이한기, "CRITICAL DATE의 연구", 국제법학회논총, 11(1) (1966)
  24. 제성호, "덴마크-노르웨이간 동부 그린란드 영토분쟁과 한국의 ‘무시’ 정책. in: 신 한일어업협정과 독도영유권: 독도영유권 훼손과 국제법적 대안의 모색" (2007), 우리영토
  25. 諸 成鎬, "국제법상 島根縣 告示 제40호의 불법·무효성", 중앙법학, 10(1), pp.430~465 (2008), 중앙법학회
  26. 奧原碧雲, "竹島沿章考", 歷史地理, 8(6) (1906)
  27. A. G. Roche, "The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case" (1959), The Hague
  28. Ian Brownlie, "Principles of Public International Law, 5th" (1998), Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  29. R. Y. Jennings, "Acquisition of Territory in International Law" (1963), Manchester Univ. Press
  30. Robert Y. Jennings, "Oppenheim's International Law, 9th" (1992), Longman
  31. Shabtai. Rosenne, "The Time Factor in the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice" (1960), A. W. Sythoff
  32. Y. Z. Blum, "Historic Titles in International Law" (1965), Martinus Nijhoff
  33. D. H. N. Johnson, "Acquisitive Prescription in International Law,”", British Yearbook of International Law, 27 (1950)
  34. Gerald Fitzmaurice, "The Law and Procedure of the I.C.J., 1951-4: Points of Substantive Law, Part Ⅱ", British Yearbook of International Law, 32 (1955)
  35. H. J. Mengel, "Der entscheidungsrelevante Zeitpunkt für die völkerrechtliche Beurteilung von Streitigkeiten territorialer Souveränität", German Yearbook of International Law, 24 (1981)
  36. Hugh Thirlway, "The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice", British Yearbook of International Law, 66 (1995)
  37. Karl N. Llewellyn, "Some Realism about Realism", Harvard Law Review, 44 (1931)
  38. L. F. E. Goldie, "The Critical Date", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 12 (1963)
  39. Philip C. Jessup, "Palmas Island Arbitration", American Journal of International Law, 22 (1928)
  40. American Journal of International Law, "Arbitral Award on the Subject of the Difference Relative to the Sovereignty over Clipperton Island", American Journal of International Law, 26 (1932)
  41. 김찬규, "‘독도개발법’, 과연 필요한가", 『문화일보』, 2004년 2월 11일자, ~ (2004)
  42. International Legal Materials, "Beagle Channel Arbitration", International Legal Materials, 17 (1978)
  43. "International Law Reports, Vol. 38" (1969)
  44. "International Law Reports, Vol. 80", ~ (1989)
  45. "International Legal Materials, Vol. 27", ~ (1988)
  46. "Reports of International Arbitral Award(R.I.A.A.), Vol. 16", ~
  47. "The Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, PCIJ Ser. A", B, No. 53, 1933
  48. ICJ Pleadings, "The Minquiers and Ecrehos Case, Vol. Ⅱ" (1953), ICJ Pleadings
  49. The Temple of Preah Vihear Case, "ICJ", ICJ Reports, ~ (1962)
  50. The Case of the Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Between EL Salvador and Honduras, "ICJ", ICJ Reports, ~ (1992)
  51. Case Concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras(Nicaragua v. Honduras), "ICJ", ICJ Reports, ~ (2007)
  52. Case concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Branca, "Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge", ICJ, 2008

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)