소유권취득의 본질과 효력
Territorial Disputes and Evidences Produced after the Critical Date : In Relation to the Acts of Developing Dokdo
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In territorial disputes, critical date means in general the date after which the actions of the parties can no longer affect the issue. Notwithstanding,in analyzing related judicial decisions delivered by international tribunals,we can find they have not completely excluded evidences produced after the key date. Moreover, all the relevant proofs presented before the court were referred to in some recent cases of international arbitration on territorial dispute. In this regard, it is improper the ROK government internally fix a critical date in advance in relation to Dokdo issue and adopt a position that any act or measure taken after the fixed date cannot have probative value. It should keep in mind accumulating continuously the records of exercising territorial sovereignty over Dokdo is a major way of strengthening or consoldating the Korean legal title to the small islet.
Abstract
In territorial disputes, critical date means in general the date after which the actions of the parties can no longer affect the issue. Notwithstanding,in analyzing related judicial decisions delivered by international tribunals,we can find they have not completely excluded evidences produced after the key date. Moreover, all the relevant proofs presented before the court were referred to in some recent cases of international arbitration on territorial dispute. In this regard, it is improper the ROK government internally fix a critical date in advance in relation to Dokdo issue and adopt a position that any act or measure taken after the fixed date cannot have probative value. It should keep in mind accumulating continuously the records of exercising territorial sovereignty over Dokdo is a major way of strengthening or consoldating the Korean legal title to the small islet.
참고문헌 (28)
- 송오식, "물권법 강의" (2005), 전남대학교 출판부
- 김남두, "재산권 사상의 흐름" (1993), 도서출판 天池
- 김상용, "물권법" (2009), 화산미디어
- 김상용, "動産物權의 善意取得에 관한 韓·獨 比較", 법학연구, 18(4), pp.1~30 (2008), 법학연구원
- 김용한, "물권법론" (1993), 박영사
- 김민중, "민법총칙강의" (2006), 두성사
- 김형배, "민법학강의" (2010), 신조사
- 박재영, "건축 중인 건물의 소유권귀속", 사법논집, 46 (2008)
- 법무부, "민법(재산편)개정자료집", ~ (2004)
- 서을오, "사비니의 물권계약론에 관한 학설사적 고찰", 법학논집, 11(2), pp.119~138 (2007), 법학연구소
- 오시영, "물권법" (2009), 학현사
- 이극찬, "시민정부론" (1970), 연세대학교출판부
- 이영준, "물권법" (1996), 박영사
- 이은영, "물권법" (2000), 박영사
- 정병호, "Celsus의 通過取得理論", 법사학연구, (22), pp.85~116 (2000), 한국법사학회
- 김준호, "민법강의" (2009), 법문사
- 홍광식, "건축 중 건물에 대한 제3자의 공사와 소유권 귀속", 판례연구, 8 (1998)
- August von Bechmann, "Zur Lehre vom Eigenthumserwerb durch Accession und von den Sachgesammtheiten" (1867), Kiel
- Philippe Bihr, "Droit civil général" (2008), Dalloz
- De Francisci, "Il trasferimento della proprietà", ~ (1924)
- F. Gallo, "Studi sul trasferimento della proprietà in SZ 74" (1957)
- Rudolf von Jhering, "Jherings Jahrbücher 16", ~ (1878)
- Paul Jörs, "Römisches Recht" (1987), Springer
- Max Kaser, "Römisches Privatrecht I, C. H. Beck", ~ (1971)
- Rolf Knütel, "Von schwimmenden Inseln, wandernden Bäumen, flüchtenden Tieren und verborgenen Schätzen, in Rechtsgeschichte und Privatrechtsdogmatik" (2000), C.F. Müller
- Dieter Schmalz, "Methodenlehre für das juristische Studium" (1992), Nomos(Baden-Baden)
- Pasquale Voci, "Modi di acquisto della proprietà", IVRA, 7 (1956)
- Stefan Weyand, "Der Durchgangserwerb in der juristischen Sekunde" (1989), Otto Schwartz & co