본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제판례상 실효적 지배의 개념과 독도에 관한 고찰

Reviews on the Concept of Effective Control in International Legal Cases and with Regard to Dokdo

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류해양학

초록

The concept of effective control is a crucial element for the acquisition as well as maintenance of territorial title. The general meaning of the concept has been described as ‘an intentional display of power and authority over the territory, by the exercise of jurisdiction and State functions, on a continuous and peaceful basis’. The concept has been developed through some significant international cases such as the Island of Palmas case (1928), Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (1933), Minquiers and Ecrehos case (1953), Burkina Faso/Mali case (1986) and Nicaragua/Colombia case (2012). In relation to Dokdo, the concept has an important bearing in regard to Korea's claims of territorial sovereignty over the island. This paper reviews the definition, components and ramifications of the effective control with regard to the acquisition and maintenance of territorial title through analyzing the relevant judgements of international courts and tribunals. Furthermore, it exams the legal ramifications of the current effective control on Dokdo and makes some suggestions for the strengthening of Korea's position on the island.

Abstract

The concept of effective control is a crucial element for the acquisition as well as maintenance of territorial title. The general meaning of the concept has been described as ‘an intentional display of power and authority over the territory, by the exercise of jurisdiction and State functions, on a continuous and peaceful basis’. The concept has been developed through some significant international cases such as the Island of Palmas case (1928), Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (1933), Minquiers and Ecrehos case (1953), Burkina Faso/Mali case (1986) and Nicaragua/Colombia case (2012). In relation to Dokdo, the concept has an important bearing in regard to Korea's claims of territorial sovereignty over the island. This paper reviews the definition, components and ramifications of the effective control with regard to the acquisition and maintenance of territorial title through analyzing the relevant judgements of international courts and tribunals. Furthermore, it exams the legal ramifications of the current effective control on Dokdo and makes some suggestions for the strengthening of Korea's position on the island.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 김대순, "국제법론(17판)", pp.1768~ (2013), 삼영사
  2. 김명기, "독도의 영유권과 실효적 지배", pp.245~ (2007), 우리영토
  3. 김명기, "독도의 실효적 지배 강화와 Critical Date", 법조, 55(11), pp.111~129 (2006), 법조협회
  4. 김명용, "독도의 실효적 지배강화를 위한 관련법제의 정비방안", 공법학연구, 11(2), pp.259~287 (2010), 한국비교공법학회
  5. 김영수, "독도의 실효적 지배에 관한 국제법 판례와 사료적 증거", 독도연구, 10, pp.85~113 (2011)
  6. 독도 영유권과 실효적 지배에 관한 연구, "김현수", 한국해양수산개발원, 73~ (2007)
  7. 동북아역사재단, "영토·해양관련 국제판례집(I)", pp.1193~ (2009), 동북아역사재단
  8. 박기갑, "도서 영유권 분쟁관련 국제판례에서 나타난 實效的 支配 내지 占有개념과 독도영유권문제", 국제법학회논총, 45(2), pp.99~115 (2000), 대한국제법학회
  9. 서형원, "독도 영유에 관한 권원 논쟁과 실효적 지배", 일본공간, 5, pp.106~137 (2009)
  10. "독도에 대한 일문일답(대한민국은 독도에대해 어떻게 영토주권을 행사하고 있나요?" (2013)[URL]
  11. 제성호, "독도의 실효적 지배 강화방안과 국제법", 저스티스, (93), pp.180~200 (2006), 한국법학원
  12. 독도영유권의 역사적 권원에 관한 연구, "정갑용", 한국해양수산개발원, 151~ (2005)
  13. 정갑용, "독도에 관한 국제법적 쟁점 연구", pp.306~ (2013), 경인문화사
  14. Brian TS, "Territorial dispute at the international court of justice", Duke Law J, 53, pp.1787~1788 (2004)
  15. Gerald F, "The law and procedure of the international court of justice, 1951-4", BYIL, 32, pp.203~293 (1956)
  16. Ian B, "Principles of Public International Law", pp.784~ (2008), Oxford University Press
  17. Minquiers and Ecrehos case, "International Court of Justice", International Court of Justice, 27~28 (1953)
  18. Temple case. In: International Court of Justice Reports, "International Court of Justice", International Court of Justice, 17~ (1961)
  19. Burkina Faso, "Mali case", International Court of Justice, 1986, pp.554~651
  20. Botswana, "Namibia case", International Court of Justice, 1999, pp.156~
  21. Qatar, "Bahrain case", International Court of Justice, 2001, pp.40~
  22. Cameroon, "Nigeria case", International Court of Justice, 2002, pp.303~
  23. Malaysia, "Indonesia case", International Court of Justice, 2002
  24. El Salvador, "Honduras case", International Court of Justice, 2003, pp.392~
  25. Benin, "Niger case", International Court of Justice, 2005, pp.90~
  26. Nicaragua, "Honduras case", International Court of Justice, 2007, pp.659~
  27. Nicaragua, "Colombia case", International Court of Justice, 2012, pp.98~
  28. John PG, "Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law", pp.702~ (2009), Oxford University Press
  29. Yemen case, In International Law Reports Vol. 114, "Eritrea", pp.1999, Lauterpacht E
  30. Malcome NS, "Title to Territory", pp.525~ (2005), Ashgate Publishing Company
  31. Malcolm NS, "International Law", pp.1708~ (2008), Cambridge University Press
  32. Permanent Court of Arbitration, "The Island of Palmas Case (or Miangas)", Permanent Court of Arbitration, 37~ (1928)
  33. Permanent Court of International Justice, "Legal Status of Eastern Greenland, In PCIJ Series", pp.71~ (1933), Permanent Court of International Justice

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)