사형폐지의 정당성 - 사법살인과 오판에 의한 사형 -
The Justification on the Abolition of Death Penalty - The Judicial Murder and Wrongful Convictions of the Death Penalty -
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In case of ‘Judical Murder’, there is not any definite conclusion at this stage if a judicial murder could be ended perfectly even though it is in progress to investigate in recent years. In case of ‘Wrongful Convictions of the Death Penalty’, also, there is just to point out the possibility and to admit it unofficially among judiciaries, and our Justice Department has been silent. In the investigation stage, a case is fabricated with a false confession by prejudgement starting with an illegal arrest. In the background, there is a doubtful confession, that if a suspect is same as a criminal or not, rather than depending on conclusive evidences. The prosecution, that should directed to the investigation of investigative agencies, prosecutes people without proper identification if a suspect is same as a criminal, and does things like ignoring or hiding negative evidences whether accidentally on purpose or by mistakes. Shameful judicial mistakes, that do not doubt the voluntariness of one´s confession which is the biggest causes of misjudgement and take it as a proof of guilt without confirmatory evidences accidentally on purpose or by mistakes, are appeared at the stage of trial. The testimony of an eyewitness or an partner in crime should be investigated if it is reliable or not, but a judge sentenced to death because he/she made the mistake of not on behalf of the accused due to the prejudgement due to the circumstance. Such reasons could be confirmed through death cases that doubt misjudgement of cases and judicial murders as mentioned. In conclusion, there are no reform measures or alternatives except the abolition of the death penalty not to make victims and innocent men being wrongfully accused. As humans who have errors of the cognitive ability and the limit, the tries to reform the penal system with inherent problems based on those errors and limits can be said to be impossible. So, the job to establish the problem of death by judicial murders and misjudgement as substantial argument for the abolition of the death penalty should be an important task for scholars in the criminal law of common sense. Based on this, it is needed to remove the judicial officials' opposition, to press legislators in criminal and to prepare grounds to support the legitimacy against general public opinion to maintain the death penalty. Starting with this research, I hope to make progresses in careful and empirical research and analysis on cases of death penalty from the establishment of the government to 1997 that are different from the statistics from now on.
Abstract
In case of ‘Judical Murder’, there is not any definite conclusion at this stage if a judicial murder could be ended perfectly even though it is in progress to investigate in recent years. In case of ‘Wrongful Convictions of the Death Penalty’, also, there is just to point out the possibility and to admit it unofficially among judiciaries, and our Justice Department has been silent. In the investigation stage, a case is fabricated with a false confession by prejudgement starting with an illegal arrest. In the background, there is a doubtful confession, that if a suspect is same as a criminal or not, rather than depending on conclusive evidences. The prosecution, that should directed to the investigation of investigative agencies, prosecutes people without proper identification if a suspect is same as a criminal, and does things like ignoring or hiding negative evidences whether accidentally on purpose or by mistakes. Shameful judicial mistakes, that do not doubt the voluntariness of one´s confession which is the biggest causes of misjudgement and take it as a proof of guilt without confirmatory evidences accidentally on purpose or by mistakes, are appeared at the stage of trial. The testimony of an eyewitness or an partner in crime should be investigated if it is reliable or not, but a judge sentenced to death because he/she made the mistake of not on behalf of the accused due to the prejudgement due to the circumstance. Such reasons could be confirmed through death cases that doubt misjudgement of cases and judicial murders as mentioned. In conclusion, there are no reform measures or alternatives except the abolition of the death penalty not to make victims and innocent men being wrongfully accused. As humans who have errors of the cognitive ability and the limit, the tries to reform the penal system with inherent problems based on those errors and limits can be said to be impossible. So, the job to establish the problem of death by judicial murders and misjudgement as substantial argument for the abolition of the death penalty should be an important task for scholars in the criminal law of common sense. Based on this, it is needed to remove the judicial officials' opposition, to press legislators in criminal and to prepare grounds to support the legitimacy against general public opinion to maintain the death penalty. Starting with this research, I hope to make progresses in careful and empirical research and analysis on cases of death penalty from the establishment of the government to 1997 that are different from the statistics from now on.
참고문헌 (26)
- 사형제도의 합리적 축소정비방안, "강석구", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2005)
- 국제심포지엄자료집, "세계과거사 청산의 흐름과 한국의 과거사정리 후속조치 방안모색", 국제심포지엄 (2009), 진실․화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회
- 김재윤, "사형 구제제도의 현황과 완비", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.733~760 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김형만, "형사절차상의 오판원인", 비교형사법연구, 9(1), pp.343~366 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 박준선, "사형제도 폐지주장 신중해야 한다. in: 사형제도 이대로 좋은가?", 박선영의원 주최 제8회 정책세미나 (2009)
- 이승준, "사형폐지와 b>로", b> 상대적 종신형의 채택, 2007, pp.17(3), 123~150[DOI]
- 이완규, "국민참여 재판제도 정착방안", 세미나<7> 건국60년 기념 한국법률가대회 (2008)
- 이존걸, "형사소송법상 재심의 특별사유에 관한 연구", 법학연구, (27), pp.375~398 (2007), 한국법학회
- 조병선, "우리나라 사형제도의 비판적 검토", 법학논집, 30(2) (2008), 청주대학교
- 2006년 상반기-2009년 하반기, "진실․화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회", 진실․화해를 위한 과거사정리위원회, ~ (2009)
- 허일태, "인혁당재건위사건과 사법살인", 동아법학, (40), pp.105~125 (2007), 법학연구소
- 황만성, "유전자감식정보의 형사절차상 활용방안 - 유전자감식정보법안의 검토를 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 18(1), pp.183~220 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- Amnesty International, "Death sentences and executions in 2009" (2010), Amnesty International
- Amy Klobuchar, "Protecting The Innocent", Convicting The Guilty: Hennepin County’s Pilot Project in Blind Sequential Eyewitness Identification, 2005, pp.23(1), ~
- Arguments for and Against the Death Penalty, "Michigan State University and Death Penalty" (2000), Information Center
- Barbara Harff, "No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955", American Political Science Review, 97(1) (2003)
- Cynthia E. Jones, "The Right Remedy for the Wrongly Convicted: Judicial Sanctions for Destruction of DNA Evidence", Fordham Law Review, 77 (2009)
- "Death in Decline '09 Los Angeles Holds California Back as National Shift to Permanent Imprisonment, ACLU of Northern California" (2010), ACLU of Northern California
- Joseph L. Hoffmann, "Protecting the Innocent: The Massachusetts Governor's Council Report", The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 95(2) (2005), Northwestern University
- Peter A. Joy, "The Relationship Between Prosecutorial Misconduct and Wrongful Convictions: Shaping Remedies for a Broken System", Wisconsin Law Review, (399) (2006), The University of Wisconsin Law School
- Samuel R. Gross, "Frequency and Predictors of False Conviction: Why We Know So Little, and New Data on Capital Cases", Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 5(4) (2008)
- Stephen B. Bright, "The Death Penalty and the Society We Want", Pierce Law Review, 6(3) (2008), Franklin Pierce Law Center
- Stephen B. Bright, "The Failure to Achieve Fairness: Race and Poverty Continue to Influence Who Dies", Journal of Constitutional Law, 11(1), pp.138~ (2008)
- Steven A. Drizin, "The Problem of False Confessions in the Post-DNA World", North Carolina Law Rev, 82 (2004)
- Susanne Kord, "1720-1860: Heroines of Horror" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- "Texas Death Penalty Developments in 2009: The Year in Review, Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty December", ~ (2009)