본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사형제도의 정당성에 대한 비판적 검토

A Critical Study on Justification for Death Penalty

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Last year, in 2010, some death penalties were executed in the US and in some countries in Asia. However, the overall number of death penalties executed globally had fallen compared to previous year, with nations abolishing death penalty on the rise. Generally, there is increase in international movement for death penalty being abolished. Since the 23rd capital punishment, as the last, executed in Korea in December 1997, we have ceased death penalty executions for the past 14 years. Such record,although we have not proclaimed Moratorium, we were known to have abolished death penalty by international society. However, each time a brutal crime takes place, the public emotion would boil up and presses the government authorities to bring back the death penalty. And time and time again, these pressures led to governments review series of actions. Strictly speaking, therefore, the death penalty in Korea is not completely abolished. In other words, those condemned criminals are merely being held around regional correction facilities, standing by to hear of their final fate, which are depended on pressure from public opinion and government authority's will. Human rights and human dignity can never coexist with death penalty. No matter how brutal a crime, considering it is the present social state connected with mankind, the government would be neglecting their duty to work on a worn-out belief that death penalty would secure us safe society. Especially so when there is no treatment or safeguard considered. Also, through constitutional evaluation, Korea has been insisting on impossibility to abolish death penalty, while maintaining death penalty system. However, both the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court demanded the question of whether to maintain or abolish death penalty should be dealt legislatively. It only implies that it is beyond human being's ability to decide on justification for putting a limitation on a right to life, even for a condemned criminal. Therefore, the burden of proof for justification for death penalty is obviously something the nation has to bear. And if it is true that such proof is not possible or inadequate,death penalty should permanently be removed from the nation's list of punishments.

Abstract

Last year, in 2010, some death penalties were executed in the US and in some countries in Asia. However, the overall number of death penalties executed globally had fallen compared to previous year, with nations abolishing death penalty on the rise. Generally, there is increase in international movement for death penalty being abolished. Since the 23rd capital punishment, as the last, executed in Korea in December 1997, we have ceased death penalty executions for the past 14 years. Such record,although we have not proclaimed Moratorium, we were known to have abolished death penalty by international society. However, each time a brutal crime takes place, the public emotion would boil up and presses the government authorities to bring back the death penalty. And time and time again, these pressures led to governments review series of actions. Strictly speaking, therefore, the death penalty in Korea is not completely abolished. In other words, those condemned criminals are merely being held around regional correction facilities, standing by to hear of their final fate, which are depended on pressure from public opinion and government authority's will. Human rights and human dignity can never coexist with death penalty. No matter how brutal a crime, considering it is the present social state connected with mankind, the government would be neglecting their duty to work on a worn-out belief that death penalty would secure us safe society. Especially so when there is no treatment or safeguard considered. Also, through constitutional evaluation, Korea has been insisting on impossibility to abolish death penalty, while maintaining death penalty system. However, both the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court demanded the question of whether to maintain or abolish death penalty should be dealt legislatively. It only implies that it is beyond human being's ability to decide on justification for putting a limitation on a right to life, even for a condemned criminal. Therefore, the burden of proof for justification for death penalty is obviously something the nation has to bear. And if it is true that such proof is not possible or inadequate,death penalty should permanently be removed from the nation's list of punishments.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 김용세, "일본의 사형제도 운영현황과 전망", 형사정책연구, 20(4), pp.199~228 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
  2. 박상식, "교정과 피해자관점에서 본 사형제도에 관한 고찰", 한양법학, (25), pp.333~358 (2009), 한양법학회
  3. 박용철, "미국의 사형제도 개괄", 비교형사법연구, 12(1), pp.333~353 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
  4. 박찬걸, "사형폐지론의 입장에서 바라본 사형제도", 한양법학, (30), pp.349~370 (2010), 한양법학회
  5. 이덕인, "사형제도에 대한 연구 -일본의 현상과 문제점", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.293~316 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
  6. 이덕인, "중국 사형제도의 현상과 전망", 형사정책연구, 21(2), pp.351~378 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
  7. 이덕인, "사형폐지의 정당성 - 사법살인과 오판에 의한 사형 -", 중앙법학, 12(2), pp.111~140 (2010), 중앙법학회
  8. 이덕인, "이슬람사회의 사형제도에 대한 연구 -이란과 사우디아라비아, 예멘을 중심으로", 외법논집, 34(4), pp.113~129 (2010), 법학연구소
  9. 이덕인, "양형으로서 사형의 정당성에 대한 검토", 비교형사법연구, 10(2), pp.93~120 (2008), 한국비교형사법학회
  10. 안진, "로크의 사형론과 형사정책적 함의", 법과정책연구, 10(1), pp.249~269 (2010), 한국법정책학회
  11. 조준현, "사형제도 존폐논쟁의 현황과 전망: 이념논쟁과 국민정서", 형사정책연구, 17(2), pp.5~36 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
  12. 허일태, "사형제도의 세계적 추세와 위헌성", 동아법학, (45), pp.263~298 (2009), 법학연구소
  13. 허일태, "법왜곡행위와 사법살인의 방지를 위한 입법정책", 형사정책연구, 18(2), pp.5~48 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  14. 홍기원, "사형제도의 범죄억지력에 관한 최근 미국 법경제학의 연구성과에 대한 검토", 고려법학, 57(57), pp.1~24 (2010), 법학연구원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)