본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사형제도에 대한 국제협약과 국내 현황에 대한 연구

The Study on the International Agreements and Domestic Situation of Death Penalty

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender, or the method used by the state to kill the prisoner Developments on the use of the death penalty in 2011 confirmed the global trend towards abolition. The number of countries that were known to have carried out death sentences decreased compared to the previous year,and overall, progress was recorded in all regions of the world. I want to introduce the situation of korean death penalty and the movement of the abolishment of death penalty. There have been many treaties and agreements in the international society for abolition of death penalties. Preparation of municipal laws to accommodate these treaties and agreements is important. The nature of death penalty has thus been analyzed, and many movements to lead the public opinion towards its abolition have taken place. Death penalty is closely connected to how a human life is viewed, Based on the assumption that death penalty is a cruel and counter-intellectual punishment, it is believed that its role is to reduce violent or heavy crimes,but it must be noted that it has little effect in reducing crimes. Death penalty does not reduce crime and abolishing it will not increase crime. But it remains supported as the concept of punishing cruel and malicious criminals. Restitutive justice holds only a historical value in scholarly debates and theories, but it continues to heavily influence the public opinion even today. The logics and organizations for its abolition will eventually lead to the abolition of death penalty, and it is expected that Korea will become an abolitionist nation.

Abstract

The death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It is the premeditated and cold-blooded killing of a human being by the state. This cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment is done in the name of justice. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender, or the method used by the state to kill the prisoner Developments on the use of the death penalty in 2011 confirmed the global trend towards abolition. The number of countries that were known to have carried out death sentences decreased compared to the previous year,and overall, progress was recorded in all regions of the world. I want to introduce the situation of korean death penalty and the movement of the abolishment of death penalty. There have been many treaties and agreements in the international society for abolition of death penalties. Preparation of municipal laws to accommodate these treaties and agreements is important. The nature of death penalty has thus been analyzed, and many movements to lead the public opinion towards its abolition have taken place. Death penalty is closely connected to how a human life is viewed, Based on the assumption that death penalty is a cruel and counter-intellectual punishment, it is believed that its role is to reduce violent or heavy crimes,but it must be noted that it has little effect in reducing crimes. Death penalty does not reduce crime and abolishing it will not increase crime. But it remains supported as the concept of punishing cruel and malicious criminals. Restitutive justice holds only a historical value in scholarly debates and theories, but it continues to heavily influence the public opinion even today. The logics and organizations for its abolition will eventually lead to the abolition of death penalty, and it is expected that Korea will become an abolitionist nation.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 장복희, "사형폐지에 관한 국제법제와 국내적 이행", 국제법학회논총, 43(2)통권 : 84, 대한국제법학회
  2. 연례사형현황 보고서, 2011 사형선고와 사형집행, , 엠네스티, ~ (2011)
  3. 박미숙, "국제조약중의 사형규범과 한국형사법의 조화 및 완비", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.827~850 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
  4. 이명웅, "국제인권법의 국내법적 효력, 국제인권법의 국내이행에 있어 문제점 및 대안", 국가인권위원회 심포지엄 (2003)
  5. , Human Right Law Journal, 2, pp.426~428 (1981)
  6. 이만희, "사형폐지와 국제인권법의 최근 동향, 형사학과 법학의 제문제:범집 민건식검사 정년기념", 박영사
  7. 하태훈, "한국에서의 사형집행유예제도에 관한 논의", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.697~718 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
  8. "BVerfGE 45, 187", ~
  9. 김영옥, "사형폐지에 대한 대책", 인문사회과학연구, 9, pp.76~ (2002), 호남대학교 인문사회과학연구소
  10. 허일태, "사형의 대체형벌로서 절대적 종신형의 검토", 형사정책, 12(2) (2006)
  11. 신양균, "절대적 종신형을 통한 사형폐지?", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.617~646 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
  12. "프랑스의 경우 테러범죄에 대하여는 사형제도를 부활하는 법안을 의회에 제출하려는 움직임이 있다", 동아일보, ~ (2004)
  13. 김수길, "사형제도의 존폐에 관한 소고", 제주대학교 논문집, 34, pp.321~ (1992)
  14. 이훈동, "死刑의 執行猶豫制度와 刑事政策的 意義", 矯正硏究, 20, pp.93~115 (2003), 한국교정학회
  15. "대법원 2006.3.24., 2006도354", ~ (2006)
  16. 2012 국제엠네스티 연례보고서, , 국제엠네스티, 28~ (2012)
  17. 이경열, "사형사법 : 적용기준과 증거규칙의 확립", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.569~596 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
  18. 도모나가 갠죠, "세계화와 인권발전" (2004)
  19. "소년법 제59조", ~
  20. "대법원 1963.2.28. 대판62도241", ~ (1963)
  21. 정경수, "국제인권법의 국내적용에 관한 비판적 분석", 민주법학, (17) (2000)
  22. 김태천, "재판과정을 통한 국제인권협약의 국내적 이행, 국제인권법의국내이행에 있어 문제점 및 대안", 국가인권위원회 심포지엄, pp.46~ (2003)
  23. "헌법재판소 1996.11.28., 95헌바1", ~ (1996)
  24. "헌법재판소 2001.4.26. 선고, 99헌가18결정", ~ (2001)
  25. 조홍석, "국제인권법의 국내법적 서명과 직접 적용가능성", 저스티스, 32(3)통권 : 53, pp.12~ (1999)
  26. 허일태, "死刑의 觀念에 관하여", 비교형사법연구, 9(2), pp.455~474 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
  27. 이상혁, "사형폐지운동협의회의 결성과 그 의의, 사형제도의 인론과 실제", 260~ (1989)
  28. 성영모, "현행 사형제도의 개선방향", 충남대학교 법학연구, 5(1) (1994)
  29. 전지연, "大韓民國에서의 死刑制度", 비교형사법연구, 6(2-1), pp.43~58 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
  30. 이창영, "사형제도 폐지의 대안과 올바른 방향성", 생명연구, 7, pp.112~ (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)